Critical Infrastructure Resilience: Resilience Thinking in Australia's Federal Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy

Australia’s national security policy is set out in a number of complex and interrelated policy documents that span multiple agencies, impact all levels of government (federal, state and local) and require strong partnerships with the private sector. This study examines the emergence of the term and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kate O'Donnell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Charles Sturt University 2013-11-01
Series:Salus Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.salusjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2013/03/ODonnell_Salus_Journal_Issue_1_Number_3_2013_pp_13-32.pdf
id doaj-7e6e39b4c93a4913be2001d0850b6a25
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e6e39b4c93a4913be2001d0850b6a252020-11-24T23:35:49ZengCharles Sturt UniversitySalus Journal2202-56772013-11-01131332Critical Infrastructure Resilience: Resilience Thinking in Australia's Federal Critical Infrastructure Protection PolicyKate O'Donnell0Griffith UniversityAustralia’s national security policy is set out in a number of complex and interrelated policy documents that span multiple agencies, impact all levels of government (federal, state and local) and require strong partnerships with the private sector. This study examines the emergence of the term and concept of critical infrastructure (CI) in modern policy and its development in Australia’s national security policy. Since its emergence in Australian federal policy, the term CI has evolved and stabilised. Yet, in the last decade CI policy has expanded to incorporate resilience thinking and the concept of critical infrastructure resilience (CIR) is now at the core of Australia’s federal CI policy. This study identifies the emergence and development of federal policy focused on protecting Australia’s most vital assets in peacetime. In doing so, it highlights that in Australian federal policy, CIR has been conceptualised in four distinct ways. However, resilience as a body of knowledge is still evolving. Articulating and analysing how resilience thinking has been incorporated into Australia’s federal CI policy, is an important next step in assessing policy focused on the protection Australia’s most vital and iconic assets.http://www.salusjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2013/03/ODonnell_Salus_Journal_Issue_1_Number_3_2013_pp_13-32.pdfCounterterrorismcritical infrastructureinfrastructure protectionresiliencepolicynational securityglobal war on terror
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kate O'Donnell
spellingShingle Kate O'Donnell
Critical Infrastructure Resilience: Resilience Thinking in Australia's Federal Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy
Salus Journal
Counterterrorism
critical infrastructure
infrastructure protection
resilience
policy
national security
global war on terror
author_facet Kate O'Donnell
author_sort Kate O'Donnell
title Critical Infrastructure Resilience: Resilience Thinking in Australia's Federal Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy
title_short Critical Infrastructure Resilience: Resilience Thinking in Australia's Federal Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy
title_full Critical Infrastructure Resilience: Resilience Thinking in Australia's Federal Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy
title_fullStr Critical Infrastructure Resilience: Resilience Thinking in Australia's Federal Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy
title_full_unstemmed Critical Infrastructure Resilience: Resilience Thinking in Australia's Federal Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy
title_sort critical infrastructure resilience: resilience thinking in australia's federal critical infrastructure protection policy
publisher Charles Sturt University
series Salus Journal
issn 2202-5677
publishDate 2013-11-01
description Australia’s national security policy is set out in a number of complex and interrelated policy documents that span multiple agencies, impact all levels of government (federal, state and local) and require strong partnerships with the private sector. This study examines the emergence of the term and concept of critical infrastructure (CI) in modern policy and its development in Australia’s national security policy. Since its emergence in Australian federal policy, the term CI has evolved and stabilised. Yet, in the last decade CI policy has expanded to incorporate resilience thinking and the concept of critical infrastructure resilience (CIR) is now at the core of Australia’s federal CI policy. This study identifies the emergence and development of federal policy focused on protecting Australia’s most vital assets in peacetime. In doing so, it highlights that in Australian federal policy, CIR has been conceptualised in four distinct ways. However, resilience as a body of knowledge is still evolving. Articulating and analysing how resilience thinking has been incorporated into Australia’s federal CI policy, is an important next step in assessing policy focused on the protection Australia’s most vital and iconic assets.
topic Counterterrorism
critical infrastructure
infrastructure protection
resilience
policy
national security
global war on terror
url http://www.salusjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2013/03/ODonnell_Salus_Journal_Issue_1_Number_3_2013_pp_13-32.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kateodonnell criticalinfrastructureresilienceresiliencethinkinginaustraliasfederalcriticalinfrastructureprotectionpolicy
_version_ 1725524563508330496