Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia
The development of renewable energy technologies (RET) depends on a wide range of criteria and regulations. To evaluate which RET (solar photovoltaic (PV), wind power plants (WPP), hydroelectric power plants (HPP) or bio-energy plants) have the greatest potential in Latvia, the most suitable approac...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Environmental and Climate Technologies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0054 |
id |
doaj-7e6959d2857a4227996e81520f79dbcf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7e6959d2857a4227996e81520f79dbcf2021-09-05T14:01:32ZengSciendoEnvironmental and Climate Technologies2255-88372019-11-01232476310.2478/rtuect-2019-0054rtuect-2019-0054Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in LatviaSuharevska Karina0Blumberga Dagnija1Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Azenes iela 12/1, Riga, LV-1048, LatviaInstitute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Azenes iela 12/1, Riga, LV-1048, LatviaThe development of renewable energy technologies (RET) depends on a wide range of criteria and regulations. To evaluate which RET (solar photovoltaic (PV), wind power plants (WPP), hydroelectric power plants (HPP) or bio-energy plants) have the greatest potential in Latvia, the most suitable approach is a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM). The proposed MCDM methodology involves TOPSIS model based on information entropy, which contributes as a criteria weighting tool. The study investigates seven main criteria from technical, economic, environmental and social aspects. Firstly, each alternative country is analysed due to the chosen RET criteria. Secondly, the assessment is extended, comparing specific data with Latvia’s MCDM of RET results. The research results show that, according to the best available examples of RET, hydro energy plants still play a substantial role for Latvia, the most promising RET development is based on bio-energy and wind renewable energies.https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0054europe-2020low/zero emission energy technology prioritizationmatlab programmingmulti-criteria decision making (mcdm)topsis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Suharevska Karina Blumberga Dagnija |
spellingShingle |
Suharevska Karina Blumberga Dagnija Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia Environmental and Climate Technologies europe-2020 low/zero emission energy technology prioritization matlab programming multi-criteria decision making (mcdm) topsis |
author_facet |
Suharevska Karina Blumberga Dagnija |
author_sort |
Suharevska Karina |
title |
Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia |
title_short |
Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia |
title_full |
Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia |
title_fullStr |
Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia |
title_sort |
progress in renewable energy technologies: innovation potential in latvia |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Environmental and Climate Technologies |
issn |
2255-8837 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
The development of renewable energy technologies (RET) depends on a wide range of criteria and regulations. To evaluate which RET (solar photovoltaic (PV), wind power plants (WPP), hydroelectric power plants (HPP) or bio-energy plants) have the greatest potential in Latvia, the most suitable approach is a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM). The proposed MCDM methodology involves TOPSIS model based on information entropy, which contributes as a criteria weighting tool. The study investigates seven main criteria from technical, economic, environmental and social aspects. Firstly, each alternative country is analysed due to the chosen RET criteria. Secondly, the assessment is extended, comparing specific data with Latvia’s MCDM of RET results. The research results show that, according to the best available examples of RET, hydro energy plants still play a substantial role for Latvia, the most promising RET development is based on bio-energy and wind renewable energies. |
topic |
europe-2020 low/zero emission energy technology prioritization matlab programming multi-criteria decision making (mcdm) topsis |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0054 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT suharevskakarina progressinrenewableenergytechnologiesinnovationpotentialinlatvia AT blumbergadagnija progressinrenewableenergytechnologiesinnovationpotentialinlatvia |
_version_ |
1717810059086397440 |