Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia

The development of renewable energy technologies (RET) depends on a wide range of criteria and regulations. To evaluate which RET (solar photovoltaic (PV), wind power plants (WPP), hydroelectric power plants (HPP) or bio-energy plants) have the greatest potential in Latvia, the most suitable approac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suharevska Karina, Blumberga Dagnija
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2019-11-01
Series:Environmental and Climate Technologies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0054
id doaj-7e6959d2857a4227996e81520f79dbcf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e6959d2857a4227996e81520f79dbcf2021-09-05T14:01:32ZengSciendoEnvironmental and Climate Technologies2255-88372019-11-01232476310.2478/rtuect-2019-0054rtuect-2019-0054Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in LatviaSuharevska Karina0Blumberga Dagnija1Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Azenes iela 12/1, Riga, LV-1048, LatviaInstitute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Azenes iela 12/1, Riga, LV-1048, LatviaThe development of renewable energy technologies (RET) depends on a wide range of criteria and regulations. To evaluate which RET (solar photovoltaic (PV), wind power plants (WPP), hydroelectric power plants (HPP) or bio-energy plants) have the greatest potential in Latvia, the most suitable approach is a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM). The proposed MCDM methodology involves TOPSIS model based on information entropy, which contributes as a criteria weighting tool. The study investigates seven main criteria from technical, economic, environmental and social aspects. Firstly, each alternative country is analysed due to the chosen RET criteria. Secondly, the assessment is extended, comparing specific data with Latvia’s MCDM of RET results. The research results show that, according to the best available examples of RET, hydro energy plants still play a substantial role for Latvia, the most promising RET development is based on bio-energy and wind renewable energies.https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0054europe-2020low/zero emission energy technology prioritizationmatlab programmingmulti-criteria decision making (mcdm)topsis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suharevska Karina
Blumberga Dagnija
spellingShingle Suharevska Karina
Blumberga Dagnija
Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia
Environmental and Climate Technologies
europe-2020
low/zero emission energy technology prioritization
matlab programming
multi-criteria decision making (mcdm)
topsis
author_facet Suharevska Karina
Blumberga Dagnija
author_sort Suharevska Karina
title Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia
title_short Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia
title_full Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia
title_fullStr Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia
title_full_unstemmed Progress in Renewable Energy Technologies: Innovation Potential in Latvia
title_sort progress in renewable energy technologies: innovation potential in latvia
publisher Sciendo
series Environmental and Climate Technologies
issn 2255-8837
publishDate 2019-11-01
description The development of renewable energy technologies (RET) depends on a wide range of criteria and regulations. To evaluate which RET (solar photovoltaic (PV), wind power plants (WPP), hydroelectric power plants (HPP) or bio-energy plants) have the greatest potential in Latvia, the most suitable approach is a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM). The proposed MCDM methodology involves TOPSIS model based on information entropy, which contributes as a criteria weighting tool. The study investigates seven main criteria from technical, economic, environmental and social aspects. Firstly, each alternative country is analysed due to the chosen RET criteria. Secondly, the assessment is extended, comparing specific data with Latvia’s MCDM of RET results. The research results show that, according to the best available examples of RET, hydro energy plants still play a substantial role for Latvia, the most promising RET development is based on bio-energy and wind renewable energies.
topic europe-2020
low/zero emission energy technology prioritization
matlab programming
multi-criteria decision making (mcdm)
topsis
url https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-0054
work_keys_str_mv AT suharevskakarina progressinrenewableenergytechnologiesinnovationpotentialinlatvia
AT blumbergadagnija progressinrenewableenergytechnologiesinnovationpotentialinlatvia
_version_ 1717810059086397440