Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect
The modulation of the Compatibility Effect (CE) according to the compatibility of the previous trial (Sequential Compatibility Effect, SCE) in three types of attentional tasks is explored. The flankers and spatial Stroop tasks have different degrees of cognitive complexity. In all three tasks it is...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Servicio de Publicaciones
2015-05-01
|
Series: | Anales de Psicología |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282015000200033&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-7e5cfa49224a43bd896eb2ee6ff72e48 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7e5cfa49224a43bd896eb2ee6ff72e482020-11-25T00:49:46ZengServicio de PublicacionesAnales de Psicología0212-97282015-05-0131268769610.6018/analesps.31.2.173071S0212-97282015000200033Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility EffectJesús Privado0Juan Botella1Manuel Suero2María Ángeles Quiroga3Roberto Colom4Universidad Complutense de MadridUniversidad Autónoma de MadridUniversidad Autónoma de MadridUniversidad Complutense de MadridUniversidad Autónoma de MadridThe modulation of the Compatibility Effect (CE) according to the compatibility of the previous trial (Sequential Compatibility Effect, SCE) in three types of attentional tasks is explored. The flankers and spatial Stroop tasks have different degrees of cognitive complexity. In all three tasks it is analyzed whether the SCE varies when the stimuli in consecutive trials are exactly the same (pure replicas) or not. The data, collected from three independent samples (total N = 1.159), show the CE in the three tasks. However, SCE only shows up in the spatial Stroop task. The effect is smaller albeit still significant when the pure replica trials are removed, a result inconsistent with those of Mayr et al. (2003) and Hommel (1998) but consistent with the Conflict Theory (Botvinick et al., 2001). Furthermore, we also discuss the importance of cognitive complexity in relation to the perspective of Botvinick et al. (2004). From this point of view more complexity should be reflected in a greater presence of cognitive conflict, and therefore a higher SCE.http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282015000200033&lng=en&tlng=enControl atencionalconflicto cognitivoefecto de compatibilidad |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jesús Privado Juan Botella Manuel Suero María Ángeles Quiroga Roberto Colom |
spellingShingle |
Jesús Privado Juan Botella Manuel Suero María Ángeles Quiroga Roberto Colom Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect Anales de Psicología Control atencional conflicto cognitivo efecto de compatibilidad |
author_facet |
Jesús Privado Juan Botella Manuel Suero María Ángeles Quiroga Roberto Colom |
author_sort |
Jesús Privado |
title |
Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect |
title_short |
Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect |
title_full |
Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect |
title_fullStr |
Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect |
title_full_unstemmed |
Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect |
title_sort |
still seeking for an explanation of the sequential compatibility effect |
publisher |
Servicio de Publicaciones |
series |
Anales de Psicología |
issn |
0212-9728 |
publishDate |
2015-05-01 |
description |
The modulation of the Compatibility Effect (CE) according to the compatibility of the previous trial (Sequential Compatibility Effect, SCE) in three types of attentional tasks is explored. The flankers and spatial Stroop tasks have different degrees of cognitive complexity. In all three tasks it is analyzed whether the SCE varies when the stimuli in consecutive trials are exactly the same (pure replicas) or not. The data, collected from three independent samples (total N = 1.159), show the CE in the three tasks. However, SCE only shows up in the spatial Stroop task. The effect is smaller albeit still significant when the pure replica trials are removed, a result inconsistent with those of Mayr et al. (2003) and Hommel (1998) but consistent with the Conflict Theory (Botvinick et al., 2001). Furthermore, we also discuss the importance of cognitive complexity in relation to the perspective of Botvinick et al. (2004). From this point of view more complexity should be reflected in a greater presence of cognitive conflict, and therefore a higher SCE. |
topic |
Control atencional conflicto cognitivo efecto de compatibilidad |
url |
http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282015000200033&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jesusprivado stillseekingforanexplanationofthesequentialcompatibilityeffect AT juanbotella stillseekingforanexplanationofthesequentialcompatibilityeffect AT manuelsuero stillseekingforanexplanationofthesequentialcompatibilityeffect AT mariaangelesquiroga stillseekingforanexplanationofthesequentialcompatibilityeffect AT robertocolom stillseekingforanexplanationofthesequentialcompatibilityeffect |
_version_ |
1725251252746452992 |