Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect

The modulation of the Compatibility Effect (CE) according to the compatibility of the previous trial (Sequential Compatibility Effect, SCE) in three types of attentional tasks is explored. The flankers and spatial Stroop tasks have different degrees of cognitive complexity. In all three tasks it is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jesús Privado, Juan Botella, Manuel Suero, María Ángeles Quiroga, Roberto Colom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Servicio de Publicaciones 2015-05-01
Series:Anales de Psicología
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282015000200033&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-7e5cfa49224a43bd896eb2ee6ff72e48
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e5cfa49224a43bd896eb2ee6ff72e482020-11-25T00:49:46ZengServicio de PublicacionesAnales de Psicología0212-97282015-05-0131268769610.6018/analesps.31.2.173071S0212-97282015000200033Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility EffectJesús Privado0Juan Botella1Manuel Suero2María Ángeles Quiroga3Roberto Colom4Universidad Complutense de MadridUniversidad Autónoma de MadridUniversidad Autónoma de MadridUniversidad Complutense de MadridUniversidad Autónoma de MadridThe modulation of the Compatibility Effect (CE) according to the compatibility of the previous trial (Sequential Compatibility Effect, SCE) in three types of attentional tasks is explored. The flankers and spatial Stroop tasks have different degrees of cognitive complexity. In all three tasks it is analyzed whether the SCE varies when the stimuli in consecutive trials are exactly the same (pure replicas) or not. The data, collected from three independent samples (total N = 1.159), show the CE in the three tasks. However, SCE only shows up in the spatial Stroop task. The effect is smaller albeit still significant when the pure replica trials are removed, a result inconsistent with those of Mayr et al. (2003) and Hommel (1998) but consistent with the Conflict Theory (Botvinick et al., 2001). Furthermore, we also discuss the importance of cognitive complexity in relation to the perspective of Botvinick et al. (2004). From this point of view more complexity should be reflected in a greater presence of cognitive conflict, and therefore a higher SCE.http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282015000200033&lng=en&tlng=enControl atencionalconflicto cognitivoefecto de compatibilidad
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jesús Privado
Juan Botella
Manuel Suero
María Ángeles Quiroga
Roberto Colom
spellingShingle Jesús Privado
Juan Botella
Manuel Suero
María Ángeles Quiroga
Roberto Colom
Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect
Anales de Psicología
Control atencional
conflicto cognitivo
efecto de compatibilidad
author_facet Jesús Privado
Juan Botella
Manuel Suero
María Ángeles Quiroga
Roberto Colom
author_sort Jesús Privado
title Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect
title_short Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect
title_full Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect
title_fullStr Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect
title_full_unstemmed Still seeking for an explanation of the Sequential Compatibility Effect
title_sort still seeking for an explanation of the sequential compatibility effect
publisher Servicio de Publicaciones
series Anales de Psicología
issn 0212-9728
publishDate 2015-05-01
description The modulation of the Compatibility Effect (CE) according to the compatibility of the previous trial (Sequential Compatibility Effect, SCE) in three types of attentional tasks is explored. The flankers and spatial Stroop tasks have different degrees of cognitive complexity. In all three tasks it is analyzed whether the SCE varies when the stimuli in consecutive trials are exactly the same (pure replicas) or not. The data, collected from three independent samples (total N = 1.159), show the CE in the three tasks. However, SCE only shows up in the spatial Stroop task. The effect is smaller albeit still significant when the pure replica trials are removed, a result inconsistent with those of Mayr et al. (2003) and Hommel (1998) but consistent with the Conflict Theory (Botvinick et al., 2001). Furthermore, we also discuss the importance of cognitive complexity in relation to the perspective of Botvinick et al. (2004). From this point of view more complexity should be reflected in a greater presence of cognitive conflict, and therefore a higher SCE.
topic Control atencional
conflicto cognitivo
efecto de compatibilidad
url http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0212-97282015000200033&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT jesusprivado stillseekingforanexplanationofthesequentialcompatibilityeffect
AT juanbotella stillseekingforanexplanationofthesequentialcompatibilityeffect
AT manuelsuero stillseekingforanexplanationofthesequentialcompatibilityeffect
AT mariaangelesquiroga stillseekingforanexplanationofthesequentialcompatibilityeffect
AT robertocolom stillseekingforanexplanationofthesequentialcompatibilityeffect
_version_ 1725251252746452992