Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution

Background: Wastewater contaminated with dyes such as Reactive Blue 203 can produce a lot of health problems if it is released into the environment without a suitable treatment. Although there are several studies on dye removal from wastewater, removal of Reactive Blue 203 has not been investigated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amirreza Talaiekhozani, Farhad Banisharif, Maryam Bazrafshan, Zeinab Eskandari, Abbas Heydari Chaleshtari, Ghasem Moghadam, Ali Mohammad Amani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2019-02-01
Series:Environmental Health Engineering and Management
Online Access:http://ehemj.com/article-1-435-en.html
id doaj-7e462e05d7cb4ddfb75b94a1070ad518
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e462e05d7cb4ddfb75b94a1070ad5182020-11-24T20:44:19ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesEnvironmental Health Engineering and Management2423-37652423-43112019-02-0161273910.15171/EHEM.2019.04 Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solutionAmirreza TalaiekhozaniFarhad BanisharifMaryam BazrafshanZeinab EskandariAbbas Heydari Chaleshtari Ghasem MoghadamAli Mohammad AmaniBackground: Wastewater contaminated with dyes such as Reactive Blue 203 can produce a lot of health problems if it is released into the environment without a suitable treatment. Although there are several studies on dye removal from wastewater, removal of Reactive Blue 203 has not been investigated by hybrid methods. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution, using combined processes of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles, Fe(VI) oxidation process, and UV radiation. Methods: The removal of dye from aqueous solution using ZnO nanoparticles, Fe(VI) oxidation process, and UV radiation was individually evaluated. Then, the results of combined methods were compared. Hydraulic retention time (HRT), pH, and temperature were the most important factors which were investigated in this study. Results: ZnO nanoparticles, Fe(VI) oxidation process, and UV radiation were able to remove 97%, 71%, and 47% of the dye in the optimal conditions, respectively. Also, the removal of dye using combination of Fe(VI) oxidation process/UV radiation, ZnO nanoparticles/Fe(VI) oxidation process, and ZnO nanoparticles/UV radiation under optimum conditions was 100%. It seems that the combined methods were significantly more effective than the methods alone for removal of dye from water. Conclusion: UV radiation alone is a simple and efficient method for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from water. Removal of Reactive Blue 203 using Fe(VI) oxidation process can be completed in a fraction of second, therefore, it can be categorized as a rapid reaction.http://ehemj.com/article-1-435-en.html
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amirreza Talaiekhozani
Farhad Banisharif
Maryam Bazrafshan
Zeinab Eskandari
Abbas Heydari Chaleshtari
Ghasem Moghadam
Ali Mohammad Amani
spellingShingle Amirreza Talaiekhozani
Farhad Banisharif
Maryam Bazrafshan
Zeinab Eskandari
Abbas Heydari Chaleshtari
Ghasem Moghadam
Ali Mohammad Amani
Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution
Environmental Health Engineering and Management
author_facet Amirreza Talaiekhozani
Farhad Banisharif
Maryam Bazrafshan
Zeinab Eskandari
Abbas Heydari Chaleshtari
Ghasem Moghadam
Ali Mohammad Amani
author_sort Amirreza Talaiekhozani
title Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution
title_short Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution
title_full Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution
title_fullStr Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution
title_sort comparing the zno/fe(vi), uv/zno and uv/fe(vi) processes for removal of reactive blue 203 from aqueous solution
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
series Environmental Health Engineering and Management
issn 2423-3765
2423-4311
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Background: Wastewater contaminated with dyes such as Reactive Blue 203 can produce a lot of health problems if it is released into the environment without a suitable treatment. Although there are several studies on dye removal from wastewater, removal of Reactive Blue 203 has not been investigated by hybrid methods. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution, using combined processes of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles, Fe(VI) oxidation process, and UV radiation. Methods: The removal of dye from aqueous solution using ZnO nanoparticles, Fe(VI) oxidation process, and UV radiation was individually evaluated. Then, the results of combined methods were compared. Hydraulic retention time (HRT), pH, and temperature were the most important factors which were investigated in this study. Results: ZnO nanoparticles, Fe(VI) oxidation process, and UV radiation were able to remove 97%, 71%, and 47% of the dye in the optimal conditions, respectively. Also, the removal of dye using combination of Fe(VI) oxidation process/UV radiation, ZnO nanoparticles/Fe(VI) oxidation process, and ZnO nanoparticles/UV radiation under optimum conditions was 100%. It seems that the combined methods were significantly more effective than the methods alone for removal of dye from water. Conclusion: UV radiation alone is a simple and efficient method for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from water. Removal of Reactive Blue 203 using Fe(VI) oxidation process can be completed in a fraction of second, therefore, it can be categorized as a rapid reaction.
url http://ehemj.com/article-1-435-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT amirrezatalaiekhozani comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution
AT farhadbanisharif comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution
AT maryambazrafshan comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution
AT zeinabeskandari comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution
AT abbasheydarichaleshtari comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution
AT ghasemmoghadam comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution
AT alimohammadamani comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution
_version_ 1716817630900256768