Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution
Background: Wastewater contaminated with dyes such as Reactive Blue 203 can produce a lot of health problems if it is released into the environment without a suitable treatment. Although there are several studies on dye removal from wastewater, removal of Reactive Blue 203 has not been investigated...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2019-02-01
|
Series: | Environmental Health Engineering and Management |
Online Access: | http://ehemj.com/article-1-435-en.html |
id |
doaj-7e462e05d7cb4ddfb75b94a1070ad518 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7e462e05d7cb4ddfb75b94a1070ad5182020-11-24T20:44:19ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesEnvironmental Health Engineering and Management2423-37652423-43112019-02-0161273910.15171/EHEM.2019.04 Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solutionAmirreza TalaiekhozaniFarhad BanisharifMaryam BazrafshanZeinab EskandariAbbas Heydari Chaleshtari Ghasem MoghadamAli Mohammad AmaniBackground: Wastewater contaminated with dyes such as Reactive Blue 203 can produce a lot of health problems if it is released into the environment without a suitable treatment. Although there are several studies on dye removal from wastewater, removal of Reactive Blue 203 has not been investigated by hybrid methods. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution, using combined processes of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles, Fe(VI) oxidation process, and UV radiation. Methods: The removal of dye from aqueous solution using ZnO nanoparticles, Fe(VI) oxidation process, and UV radiation was individually evaluated. Then, the results of combined methods were compared. Hydraulic retention time (HRT), pH, and temperature were the most important factors which were investigated in this study. Results: ZnO nanoparticles, Fe(VI) oxidation process, and UV radiation were able to remove 97%, 71%, and 47% of the dye in the optimal conditions, respectively. Also, the removal of dye using combination of Fe(VI) oxidation process/UV radiation, ZnO nanoparticles/Fe(VI) oxidation process, and ZnO nanoparticles/UV radiation under optimum conditions was 100%. It seems that the combined methods were significantly more effective than the methods alone for removal of dye from water. Conclusion: UV radiation alone is a simple and efficient method for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from water. Removal of Reactive Blue 203 using Fe(VI) oxidation process can be completed in a fraction of second, therefore, it can be categorized as a rapid reaction.http://ehemj.com/article-1-435-en.html |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Amirreza Talaiekhozani Farhad Banisharif Maryam Bazrafshan Zeinab Eskandari Abbas Heydari Chaleshtari Ghasem Moghadam Ali Mohammad Amani |
spellingShingle |
Amirreza Talaiekhozani Farhad Banisharif Maryam Bazrafshan Zeinab Eskandari Abbas Heydari Chaleshtari Ghasem Moghadam Ali Mohammad Amani Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution Environmental Health Engineering and Management |
author_facet |
Amirreza Talaiekhozani Farhad Banisharif Maryam Bazrafshan Zeinab Eskandari Abbas Heydari Chaleshtari Ghasem Moghadam Ali Mohammad Amani |
author_sort |
Amirreza Talaiekhozani |
title |
Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution |
title_short |
Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution |
title_full |
Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution |
title_fullStr |
Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing the ZnO/Fe(VI), UV/ZnO and UV/Fe(VI) processes for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution |
title_sort |
comparing the zno/fe(vi), uv/zno and uv/fe(vi) processes for removal of reactive blue 203 from aqueous solution |
publisher |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Environmental Health Engineering and Management |
issn |
2423-3765 2423-4311 |
publishDate |
2019-02-01 |
description |
Background: Wastewater contaminated with dyes such as Reactive Blue 203 can produce a lot of health problems if it is released into the environment without a suitable treatment. Although there are several studies on dye removal from wastewater, removal of Reactive Blue 203 has not been investigated by hybrid methods. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the removal of Reactive Blue 203 from aqueous solution, using combined processes of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles, Fe(VI) oxidation process, and UV radiation.
Methods: The removal of dye from aqueous solution using ZnO nanoparticles, Fe(VI) oxidation process, and UV radiation was individually evaluated. Then, the results of combined methods were compared. Hydraulic retention time (HRT), pH, and temperature were the most important factors which were investigated in this study.
Results: ZnO nanoparticles, Fe(VI) oxidation process, and UV radiation were able to remove 97%, 71%, and 47% of the dye in the optimal conditions, respectively. Also, the removal of dye using combination of Fe(VI) oxidation process/UV radiation, ZnO nanoparticles/Fe(VI) oxidation process, and ZnO nanoparticles/UV radiation under optimum conditions was 100%. It seems that the combined methods were significantly more effective than the methods alone for removal of dye from water.
Conclusion: UV radiation alone is a simple and efficient method for removal of Reactive Blue 203 from water. Removal of Reactive Blue 203 using Fe(VI) oxidation process can be completed in a fraction of second, therefore, it can be categorized as a rapid reaction. |
url |
http://ehemj.com/article-1-435-en.html |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amirrezatalaiekhozani comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution AT farhadbanisharif comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution AT maryambazrafshan comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution AT zeinabeskandari comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution AT abbasheydarichaleshtari comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution AT ghasemmoghadam comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution AT alimohammadamani comparingtheznofeviuvznoanduvfeviprocessesforremovalofreactiveblue203fromaqueoussolution |
_version_ |
1716817630900256768 |