Current Use of Methylprednisolone for Acute Spinal Cord Injury by Spine Surgeons of Thailand

Objective: To determine current decision making in methylprednisolone succinate (MPS) administration for acute spinal cord injury (ASCI) treatment in Thailand. Methods:A questionnaire was sent to all orthopedic surgeons who attended the annual meeting of the Spine Society of Thailand 2016. The ques...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Panya Luksanapruksa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mahidol University 2016-08-01
Series:Siriraj Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/64482
id doaj-7e2b197fd22c454a9577809b0fd36854
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e2b197fd22c454a9577809b0fd368542021-08-13T09:52:16ZengMahidol UniversitySiriraj Medical Journal2228-80822016-08-01684Current Use of Methylprednisolone for Acute Spinal Cord Injury by Spine Surgeons of ThailandPanya Luksanapruksa0Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700 Objective: To determine current decision making in methylprednisolone succinate (MPS) administration for acute spinal cord injury (ASCI) treatment in Thailand. Methods:A questionnaire was sent to all orthopedic surgeons who attended the annual meeting of the Spine Society of Thailand 2016. The questionnaire had 3 parts of questions including demographic data, opinions in MPS use in general ASCI patients and patients who meet the exclusion criteria in NASCIS III study. Results:Fifty-five respondents completed the survey (overall response rate was 27.1 %) and there was 78.18% prescribe MPS to ASCI patients. Among them, 40 % prescribe according to NASCIS II and 55.6% NASCIS III. The main reasons for MPS administration are practice standard (38.6%), effectiveness (31.8%) and liability issue (22.7%). In patients who met the exclusion criteria of NASCIS III, most respondents do not prescribe any steroids in patients who had age below 14 years old (42.2%), pregnancy (77.8%), severe underlying disease (72.7%), body weight more than 109 kg (40.9%), gunshot injury (59.1%) and previous spinal cord injury (46.5%). Interestingly, there were 93.2% prescribed MPS to patients who sustained ACSI more than 8 hours. Conclusion:Because the institutional standard supported MPS use, most participants prescribed MPS in ASCI despite current clinical data from recent studies. Most participants who did not use MPS in patients had exclusion criteria of NASCIS III. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/64482Methylprednisoloneacute spinal cord injuryThailandsurvey
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Panya Luksanapruksa
spellingShingle Panya Luksanapruksa
Current Use of Methylprednisolone for Acute Spinal Cord Injury by Spine Surgeons of Thailand
Siriraj Medical Journal
Methylprednisolone
acute spinal cord injury
Thailand
survey
author_facet Panya Luksanapruksa
author_sort Panya Luksanapruksa
title Current Use of Methylprednisolone for Acute Spinal Cord Injury by Spine Surgeons of Thailand
title_short Current Use of Methylprednisolone for Acute Spinal Cord Injury by Spine Surgeons of Thailand
title_full Current Use of Methylprednisolone for Acute Spinal Cord Injury by Spine Surgeons of Thailand
title_fullStr Current Use of Methylprednisolone for Acute Spinal Cord Injury by Spine Surgeons of Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Current Use of Methylprednisolone for Acute Spinal Cord Injury by Spine Surgeons of Thailand
title_sort current use of methylprednisolone for acute spinal cord injury by spine surgeons of thailand
publisher Mahidol University
series Siriraj Medical Journal
issn 2228-8082
publishDate 2016-08-01
description Objective: To determine current decision making in methylprednisolone succinate (MPS) administration for acute spinal cord injury (ASCI) treatment in Thailand. Methods:A questionnaire was sent to all orthopedic surgeons who attended the annual meeting of the Spine Society of Thailand 2016. The questionnaire had 3 parts of questions including demographic data, opinions in MPS use in general ASCI patients and patients who meet the exclusion criteria in NASCIS III study. Results:Fifty-five respondents completed the survey (overall response rate was 27.1 %) and there was 78.18% prescribe MPS to ASCI patients. Among them, 40 % prescribe according to NASCIS II and 55.6% NASCIS III. The main reasons for MPS administration are practice standard (38.6%), effectiveness (31.8%) and liability issue (22.7%). In patients who met the exclusion criteria of NASCIS III, most respondents do not prescribe any steroids in patients who had age below 14 years old (42.2%), pregnancy (77.8%), severe underlying disease (72.7%), body weight more than 109 kg (40.9%), gunshot injury (59.1%) and previous spinal cord injury (46.5%). Interestingly, there were 93.2% prescribed MPS to patients who sustained ACSI more than 8 hours. Conclusion:Because the institutional standard supported MPS use, most participants prescribed MPS in ASCI despite current clinical data from recent studies. Most participants who did not use MPS in patients had exclusion criteria of NASCIS III.
topic Methylprednisolone
acute spinal cord injury
Thailand
survey
url https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/64482
work_keys_str_mv AT panyaluksanapruksa currentuseofmethylprednisoloneforacutespinalcordinjurybyspinesurgeonsofthailand
_version_ 1721208760363384832