Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong!
This paper challenges the oft-repeated conventional story of the beginning of ‘modern’ Australian archaeology, seen as the era of the professional archaeologist that succeeded an undisciplined phase of indiscriminate collecting of skulls and stone artefacts by ‘amateurs’ who, on the whole, believed...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
Online Access: | https://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/626 |
id |
doaj-7e2a33eede744e7a86bde5339b68f17d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7e2a33eede744e7a86bde5339b68f17d2020-11-25T00:36:54ZengUbiquity PressBulletin of the History of Archaeology2047-69302020-02-0130110.5334/bha-626596Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong!Matthew Spriggs0The Australian National UniversityThis paper challenges the oft-repeated conventional story of the beginning of ‘modern’ Australian archaeology, seen as the era of the professional archaeologist that succeeded an undisciplined phase of indiscriminate collecting of skulls and stone artefacts by ‘amateurs’ who, on the whole, believed that Indigenous Australians had arrived on the continent so recently that any excavation of archaeological sites would be pointless. Cambridge-trained John Mulvaney’s excavations at Fromm’s Landing on the Murray River in South Australia commencing in January 1956 have been seen most recently as marking the decisive break, one between ‘good’, professional and ethical archaeology and the earlier ‘bad’ amateur period of mere antiquarianism, ignoring the concerns of and trampling upon the rights of Indigenous Australians in the spirit of triumphant colonialism. This contrast is inaccurate, overdrawn, and ignores the positive contribution of many earlier conscientious scholars; labelling all of them as ‘amateurs’ confuses rather than enlightens the history of Australian archaeology.https://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/626 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Matthew Spriggs |
spellingShingle |
Matthew Spriggs Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong! Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
author_facet |
Matthew Spriggs |
author_sort |
Matthew Spriggs |
title |
Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong! |
title_short |
Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong! |
title_full |
Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong! |
title_fullStr |
Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong! |
title_full_unstemmed |
Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong! |
title_sort |
everything you’ve been told about the history of australian archaeology is wrong! |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Bulletin of the History of Archaeology |
issn |
2047-6930 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
This paper challenges the oft-repeated conventional story of the beginning of ‘modern’ Australian archaeology, seen as the era of the professional archaeologist that succeeded an undisciplined phase of indiscriminate collecting of skulls and stone artefacts by ‘amateurs’ who, on the whole, believed that Indigenous Australians had arrived on the continent so recently that any excavation of archaeological sites would be pointless. Cambridge-trained John Mulvaney’s excavations at Fromm’s Landing on the Murray River in South Australia commencing in January 1956 have been seen most recently as marking the decisive break, one between ‘good’, professional and ethical archaeology and the earlier ‘bad’ amateur period of mere antiquarianism, ignoring the concerns of and trampling upon the rights of Indigenous Australians in the spirit of triumphant colonialism. This contrast is inaccurate, overdrawn, and ignores the positive contribution of many earlier conscientious scholars; labelling all of them as ‘amateurs’ confuses rather than enlightens the history of Australian archaeology. |
url |
https://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/626 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT matthewspriggs everythingyouvebeentoldaboutthehistoryofaustralianarchaeologyiswrong |
_version_ |
1725303809961361408 |