Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong!

This paper challenges the oft-repeated conventional story of the beginning of ‘modern’ Australian archaeology, seen as the era of the professional archaeologist that succeeded an undisciplined phase of indiscriminate collecting of skulls and stone artefacts by ‘amateurs’ who, on the whole, believed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matthew Spriggs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2020-02-01
Series:Bulletin of the History of Archaeology
Online Access:https://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/626
id doaj-7e2a33eede744e7a86bde5339b68f17d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e2a33eede744e7a86bde5339b68f17d2020-11-25T00:36:54ZengUbiquity PressBulletin of the History of Archaeology2047-69302020-02-0130110.5334/bha-626596Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong!Matthew Spriggs0The Australian National UniversityThis paper challenges the oft-repeated conventional story of the beginning of ‘modern’ Australian archaeology, seen as the era of the professional archaeologist that succeeded an undisciplined phase of indiscriminate collecting of skulls and stone artefacts by ‘amateurs’ who, on the whole, believed that Indigenous Australians had arrived on the continent so recently that any excavation of archaeological sites would be pointless. Cambridge-trained John Mulvaney’s excavations at Fromm’s Landing on the Murray River in South Australia commencing in January 1956 have been seen most recently as marking the decisive break, one between ‘good’, professional and ethical archaeology and the earlier ‘bad’ amateur period of mere antiquarianism, ignoring the concerns of and trampling upon the rights of Indigenous Australians in the spirit of triumphant colonialism. This contrast is inaccurate, overdrawn, and ignores the positive contribution of many earlier conscientious scholars; labelling all of them as ‘amateurs’ confuses rather than enlightens the history of Australian archaeology.https://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/626
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew Spriggs
spellingShingle Matthew Spriggs
Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong!
Bulletin of the History of Archaeology
author_facet Matthew Spriggs
author_sort Matthew Spriggs
title Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong!
title_short Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong!
title_full Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong!
title_fullStr Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong!
title_full_unstemmed Everything You’ve Been Told About the History of Australian Archaeology is Wrong!
title_sort everything you’ve been told about the history of australian archaeology is wrong!
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Bulletin of the History of Archaeology
issn 2047-6930
publishDate 2020-02-01
description This paper challenges the oft-repeated conventional story of the beginning of ‘modern’ Australian archaeology, seen as the era of the professional archaeologist that succeeded an undisciplined phase of indiscriminate collecting of skulls and stone artefacts by ‘amateurs’ who, on the whole, believed that Indigenous Australians had arrived on the continent so recently that any excavation of archaeological sites would be pointless. Cambridge-trained John Mulvaney’s excavations at Fromm’s Landing on the Murray River in South Australia commencing in January 1956 have been seen most recently as marking the decisive break, one between ‘good’, professional and ethical archaeology and the earlier ‘bad’ amateur period of mere antiquarianism, ignoring the concerns of and trampling upon the rights of Indigenous Australians in the spirit of triumphant colonialism. This contrast is inaccurate, overdrawn, and ignores the positive contribution of many earlier conscientious scholars; labelling all of them as ‘amateurs’ confuses rather than enlightens the history of Australian archaeology.
url https://www.archaeologybulletin.org/articles/626
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewspriggs everythingyouvebeentoldaboutthehistoryofaustralianarchaeologyiswrong
_version_ 1725303809961361408