A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteric Calculus

Introduction: There are various modalities of breaking urinary tract calculus. The aim of this study was to compare outcome between laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in patients with upper ureteric calculus in terms of stone free rate, proximal migration and complication. Methods: This was a prospect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajan Koju, Hemnath Joshi, Sujan Makaju Shrestha, Robin Karmacharya, Narendra Shalike
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lumbini Medical College 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Lumbini Medical College
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jlmc.edu.np/index.php/JLMC/article/view/303
id doaj-7e25189ec7b34691bc41838d16372ff4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e25189ec7b34691bc41838d16372ff42020-11-25T02:48:50ZengLumbini Medical CollegeJournal of Lumbini Medical College2392-46322542-26182020-06-018110.22502/jlmc.v8i1.303A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteric CalculusRajan Koju0Hemnath Joshi1Sujan Makaju Shrestha2Robin Karmacharya3Narendra Shalike4Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal.Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal.Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal.Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal.Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dulikhel, Nepal. Introduction: There are various modalities of breaking urinary tract calculus. The aim of this study was to compare outcome between laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in patients with upper ureteric calculus in terms of stone free rate, proximal migration and complication. Methods: This was a prospective comparative study done in 210 patients with upper ureteric calculus. The patients were randomized into two groups (Laser Lithotripsy and Pneumatic Lithotripsy) from April 2018 to June 2019. The main objective of both the procedures was to break stone into particles less than 3 mm which was confirmed by X-ray KUB and ultrasonography of abdomen and pelvis after six weeks and to compare effectiveness in terms of immediate stone free rate, proximal migration, operative duration and post-operative complication. Results: There was no difference in age, gender and stone size in both groups. Immediate stone free rate was 99.05% in Laser Lithotripsy and 76.19% in Pneumatic Lithotripsy (p value<0.001). Proximal migration in Laser Lithotripsy was 0.95% and 23.81% in Pneumatic Lithotripsy (p<0.001). There was significantly prolonged operative duration in Pneumatic Lithotripsy (14.7±4.77 min vs 13.31±3.24 in Laser Lithotripsy, p=0.014). Complications were more in Pneumatic Lithotripsy group, which was statistically significant (p=0.017). Conclusion: Both pneumatic and laser lithotripsy are effective and safe modalities for treating upper ureteric calculus, however laser has less chances of proximal migration and higher immediate stone free rate with less complication https://www.jlmc.edu.np/index.php/JLMC/article/view/303Laser lithotripsyPneumatice lithotripsyUreteric calculus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rajan Koju
Hemnath Joshi
Sujan Makaju Shrestha
Robin Karmacharya
Narendra Shalike
spellingShingle Rajan Koju
Hemnath Joshi
Sujan Makaju Shrestha
Robin Karmacharya
Narendra Shalike
A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteric Calculus
Journal of Lumbini Medical College
Laser lithotripsy
Pneumatice lithotripsy
Ureteric calculus
author_facet Rajan Koju
Hemnath Joshi
Sujan Makaju Shrestha
Robin Karmacharya
Narendra Shalike
author_sort Rajan Koju
title A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteric Calculus
title_short A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteric Calculus
title_full A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteric Calculus
title_fullStr A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteric Calculus
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study Between Pneumatic and Laser Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteric Calculus
title_sort comparative study between pneumatic and laser lithotripsy for proximal ureteric calculus
publisher Lumbini Medical College
series Journal of Lumbini Medical College
issn 2392-4632
2542-2618
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Introduction: There are various modalities of breaking urinary tract calculus. The aim of this study was to compare outcome between laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in patients with upper ureteric calculus in terms of stone free rate, proximal migration and complication. Methods: This was a prospective comparative study done in 210 patients with upper ureteric calculus. The patients were randomized into two groups (Laser Lithotripsy and Pneumatic Lithotripsy) from April 2018 to June 2019. The main objective of both the procedures was to break stone into particles less than 3 mm which was confirmed by X-ray KUB and ultrasonography of abdomen and pelvis after six weeks and to compare effectiveness in terms of immediate stone free rate, proximal migration, operative duration and post-operative complication. Results: There was no difference in age, gender and stone size in both groups. Immediate stone free rate was 99.05% in Laser Lithotripsy and 76.19% in Pneumatic Lithotripsy (p value<0.001). Proximal migration in Laser Lithotripsy was 0.95% and 23.81% in Pneumatic Lithotripsy (p<0.001). There was significantly prolonged operative duration in Pneumatic Lithotripsy (14.7±4.77 min vs 13.31±3.24 in Laser Lithotripsy, p=0.014). Complications were more in Pneumatic Lithotripsy group, which was statistically significant (p=0.017). Conclusion: Both pneumatic and laser lithotripsy are effective and safe modalities for treating upper ureteric calculus, however laser has less chances of proximal migration and higher immediate stone free rate with less complication
topic Laser lithotripsy
Pneumatice lithotripsy
Ureteric calculus
url https://www.jlmc.edu.np/index.php/JLMC/article/view/303
work_keys_str_mv AT rajankoju acomparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforproximaluretericcalculus
AT hemnathjoshi acomparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforproximaluretericcalculus
AT sujanmakajushrestha acomparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforproximaluretericcalculus
AT robinkarmacharya acomparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforproximaluretericcalculus
AT narendrashalike acomparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforproximaluretericcalculus
AT rajankoju comparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforproximaluretericcalculus
AT hemnathjoshi comparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforproximaluretericcalculus
AT sujanmakajushrestha comparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforproximaluretericcalculus
AT robinkarmacharya comparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforproximaluretericcalculus
AT narendrashalike comparativestudybetweenpneumaticandlaserlithotripsyforproximaluretericcalculus
_version_ 1724746392189009920