Is torosaurus triceratops? Geometric morphometric evidence of late maastrichtian ceratopsid dinosaurs.

<h4>Background</h4>Recent assessments of morphological changes in the frill during ontogeny hypothesized that the late Maastrichtian horned dinosaur Torosaurus represents the "old adult" of Triceratops, although acceptance of this finding has been disputed on several lines of e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leonardo Maiorino, Andrew A Farke, Tassos Kotsakis, Paolo Piras
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24303058/pdf/?tool=EBI
id doaj-7e211bedb4ca45c28b29a41e505fcaa3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e211bedb4ca45c28b29a41e505fcaa32021-03-03T22:45:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01811e8160810.1371/journal.pone.0081608Is torosaurus triceratops? Geometric morphometric evidence of late maastrichtian ceratopsid dinosaurs.Leonardo MaiorinoAndrew A FarkeTassos KotsakisPaolo Piras<h4>Background</h4>Recent assessments of morphological changes in the frill during ontogeny hypothesized that the late Maastrichtian horned dinosaur Torosaurus represents the "old adult" of Triceratops, although acceptance of this finding has been disputed on several lines of evidence.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Examining the cranial morphology of 28 skulls in lateral view and 36 squamosals of Nedoceratops hatcheri, Triceratops spp. and Torosaurus spp. by means of landmark-based geometric morphometrics, we compared ontogenetic trajectories among these taxa. Principal Component Analysis and cluster analysis confirmed different cranial morphologies. Torosaurus shape space is well separated from Triceratops, whereas Triceratops horridus and Triceratops prorsus partially overlap within Triceratops shape space. Linear regressions between shape and size suggest different ontogenetic trajectories among these taxa. Results support the "traditional" taxonomic status of Torosaurus. We hypothesize that ontogeny drives cranial morphology with different patterns between Torosaurus and Triceratops.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Torosaurus is a distinct and valid taxon. Whether looking at entire skulls, skulls without the frill, frills alone, or squamosals, Torosaurus has different morphologies and distinct allometric trajectories compared to Triceratops. This new approach confirms the taxonomic status of Torosaurus as well as the comparatively low diversity of ceratopsids at the end of the Maastrichtian in North America.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24303058/pdf/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leonardo Maiorino
Andrew A Farke
Tassos Kotsakis
Paolo Piras
spellingShingle Leonardo Maiorino
Andrew A Farke
Tassos Kotsakis
Paolo Piras
Is torosaurus triceratops? Geometric morphometric evidence of late maastrichtian ceratopsid dinosaurs.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Leonardo Maiorino
Andrew A Farke
Tassos Kotsakis
Paolo Piras
author_sort Leonardo Maiorino
title Is torosaurus triceratops? Geometric morphometric evidence of late maastrichtian ceratopsid dinosaurs.
title_short Is torosaurus triceratops? Geometric morphometric evidence of late maastrichtian ceratopsid dinosaurs.
title_full Is torosaurus triceratops? Geometric morphometric evidence of late maastrichtian ceratopsid dinosaurs.
title_fullStr Is torosaurus triceratops? Geometric morphometric evidence of late maastrichtian ceratopsid dinosaurs.
title_full_unstemmed Is torosaurus triceratops? Geometric morphometric evidence of late maastrichtian ceratopsid dinosaurs.
title_sort is torosaurus triceratops? geometric morphometric evidence of late maastrichtian ceratopsid dinosaurs.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>Recent assessments of morphological changes in the frill during ontogeny hypothesized that the late Maastrichtian horned dinosaur Torosaurus represents the "old adult" of Triceratops, although acceptance of this finding has been disputed on several lines of evidence.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Examining the cranial morphology of 28 skulls in lateral view and 36 squamosals of Nedoceratops hatcheri, Triceratops spp. and Torosaurus spp. by means of landmark-based geometric morphometrics, we compared ontogenetic trajectories among these taxa. Principal Component Analysis and cluster analysis confirmed different cranial morphologies. Torosaurus shape space is well separated from Triceratops, whereas Triceratops horridus and Triceratops prorsus partially overlap within Triceratops shape space. Linear regressions between shape and size suggest different ontogenetic trajectories among these taxa. Results support the "traditional" taxonomic status of Torosaurus. We hypothesize that ontogeny drives cranial morphology with different patterns between Torosaurus and Triceratops.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Torosaurus is a distinct and valid taxon. Whether looking at entire skulls, skulls without the frill, frills alone, or squamosals, Torosaurus has different morphologies and distinct allometric trajectories compared to Triceratops. This new approach confirms the taxonomic status of Torosaurus as well as the comparatively low diversity of ceratopsids at the end of the Maastrichtian in North America.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24303058/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardomaiorino istorosaurustriceratopsgeometricmorphometricevidenceoflatemaastrichtianceratopsiddinosaurs
AT andrewafarke istorosaurustriceratopsgeometricmorphometricevidenceoflatemaastrichtianceratopsiddinosaurs
AT tassoskotsakis istorosaurustriceratopsgeometricmorphometricevidenceoflatemaastrichtianceratopsiddinosaurs
AT paolopiras istorosaurustriceratopsgeometricmorphometricevidenceoflatemaastrichtianceratopsiddinosaurs
_version_ 1714812267486248960