Revisiting the “Model of Place”: A Comparative Study of Placemaking and Sustainability

The literature on sustainability policies and placemaking strategies reveals the inadequacy of both concepts to address current urban issues suggesting the need for new approaches. Sustainability researchers and policy makers are seeking an integrated approach to sustainability within which placemak...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ensiyeh Ghavampour, Brenda Vale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2019-06-01
Series:Urban Planning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2015
id doaj-7e13158808b843c79852e32c90a275ad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e13158808b843c79852e32c90a275ad2020-11-25T01:38:05ZengCogitatioUrban Planning2183-76352019-06-014219620610.17645/up.v4i2.20151068Revisiting the “Model of Place”: A Comparative Study of Placemaking and SustainabilityEnsiyeh Ghavampour0Brenda Vale1Urban Entrepreneur, New ZealandSchool of Architecture, Victoria University of Wellington, New ZealandThe literature on sustainability policies and placemaking strategies reveals the inadequacy of both concepts to address current urban issues suggesting the need for new approaches. Sustainability researchers and policy makers are seeking an integrated approach to sustainability within which placemaking is a powerful tool in achieving sustainability goals. However, despite this rising awareness of place and its value, there is growing concern that the value of place and its urban meaning is declining. Placemaking appears to have changed from being an authentic everyday practice to a professional responsibility, and the understanding of the intangible character of place is mainly lost in the modern making of places. The emphasis of designers on physical design attributes assumes a fragile model of causality, underestimating the other necessary components for placemaking—behaviour and meaning. Comparing models of sustainability and place, this article suggests that there is need for a shift from the current model of placemaking towards a strong model of progress and balance in creating quality places. The article also describes the implications of the new model for design practice and how it could be used with the goal of achieving both placemaking and sustainability visions.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2015community buildingmodel of placeplaceplacemakingsense of placesustainability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ensiyeh Ghavampour
Brenda Vale
spellingShingle Ensiyeh Ghavampour
Brenda Vale
Revisiting the “Model of Place”: A Comparative Study of Placemaking and Sustainability
Urban Planning
community building
model of place
place
placemaking
sense of place
sustainability
author_facet Ensiyeh Ghavampour
Brenda Vale
author_sort Ensiyeh Ghavampour
title Revisiting the “Model of Place”: A Comparative Study of Placemaking and Sustainability
title_short Revisiting the “Model of Place”: A Comparative Study of Placemaking and Sustainability
title_full Revisiting the “Model of Place”: A Comparative Study of Placemaking and Sustainability
title_fullStr Revisiting the “Model of Place”: A Comparative Study of Placemaking and Sustainability
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the “Model of Place”: A Comparative Study of Placemaking and Sustainability
title_sort revisiting the “model of place”: a comparative study of placemaking and sustainability
publisher Cogitatio
series Urban Planning
issn 2183-7635
publishDate 2019-06-01
description The literature on sustainability policies and placemaking strategies reveals the inadequacy of both concepts to address current urban issues suggesting the need for new approaches. Sustainability researchers and policy makers are seeking an integrated approach to sustainability within which placemaking is a powerful tool in achieving sustainability goals. However, despite this rising awareness of place and its value, there is growing concern that the value of place and its urban meaning is declining. Placemaking appears to have changed from being an authentic everyday practice to a professional responsibility, and the understanding of the intangible character of place is mainly lost in the modern making of places. The emphasis of designers on physical design attributes assumes a fragile model of causality, underestimating the other necessary components for placemaking—behaviour and meaning. Comparing models of sustainability and place, this article suggests that there is need for a shift from the current model of placemaking towards a strong model of progress and balance in creating quality places. The article also describes the implications of the new model for design practice and how it could be used with the goal of achieving both placemaking and sustainability visions.
topic community building
model of place
place
placemaking
sense of place
sustainability
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2015
work_keys_str_mv AT ensiyehghavampour revisitingthemodelofplaceacomparativestudyofplacemakingandsustainability
AT brendavale revisitingthemodelofplaceacomparativestudyofplacemakingandsustainability
_version_ 1725055316996915200