Breaking the taboo: eight Swedish clinical psychologists’ experiences of compassion fatigue

Purpose The aim of the study was to investigate the participating psychologists’ experiences with compassion fatigue, and to identify individual, interpersonal, and organizational factors and strategies perceived as contributing or protecting in relation to compassion fatigue. Methods Semi-structure...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Malin Norrman Harling, Elisabeth Högman, Elinor Schad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1785610
id doaj-7dfe2dca26964c29b90e4b7175f9d0a0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7dfe2dca26964c29b90e4b7175f9d0a02021-03-03T10:41:10ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being1748-26231748-26312020-01-0115110.1080/17482631.2020.17856101785610Breaking the taboo: eight Swedish clinical psychologists’ experiences of compassion fatigueMalin Norrman Harling0Elisabeth Högman1Elinor Schad2Lund UniversityLund UniversityLund UniversityPurpose The aim of the study was to investigate the participating psychologists’ experiences with compassion fatigue, and to identify individual, interpersonal, and organizational factors and strategies perceived as contributing or protecting in relation to compassion fatigue. Methods Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with eight psychologists (three men and five women) with more than five years of experience in clinical practice. The interviews were analyzed with thematic analysis, generating five themes. Results These were organizational and task specific factors which the participants felt contributed to their compassion fatigue (“mission impossible” and “emotional strain”), experiences of compassion fatigue (“consequences”), interpersonal factors that were perceived as contributing or protecting (“interpersonal factors”), and individual factors that were perceived as protecting (“shielding and strengthening factors”). Conclusions It was found that all of the participants had experienced negative impact of compassion fatigue on their personal lives. A large quantity of patients, and complex patient cases, as well as high expectations on the psychologists were experienced as contributing factors. Collegial support, an empathetic boss, a high degree of agency at work, and fulfiling activities outside of work were experienced as protecting against compassion fatigue.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1785610clinical psychologistscompassion fatigueorganizational factorspersonal strategiessemi structured interviewsswedenthematic analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Malin Norrman Harling
Elisabeth Högman
Elinor Schad
spellingShingle Malin Norrman Harling
Elisabeth Högman
Elinor Schad
Breaking the taboo: eight Swedish clinical psychologists’ experiences of compassion fatigue
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
clinical psychologists
compassion fatigue
organizational factors
personal strategies
semi structured interviews
sweden
thematic analysis
author_facet Malin Norrman Harling
Elisabeth Högman
Elinor Schad
author_sort Malin Norrman Harling
title Breaking the taboo: eight Swedish clinical psychologists’ experiences of compassion fatigue
title_short Breaking the taboo: eight Swedish clinical psychologists’ experiences of compassion fatigue
title_full Breaking the taboo: eight Swedish clinical psychologists’ experiences of compassion fatigue
title_fullStr Breaking the taboo: eight Swedish clinical psychologists’ experiences of compassion fatigue
title_full_unstemmed Breaking the taboo: eight Swedish clinical psychologists’ experiences of compassion fatigue
title_sort breaking the taboo: eight swedish clinical psychologists’ experiences of compassion fatigue
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
issn 1748-2623
1748-2631
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Purpose The aim of the study was to investigate the participating psychologists’ experiences with compassion fatigue, and to identify individual, interpersonal, and organizational factors and strategies perceived as contributing or protecting in relation to compassion fatigue. Methods Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with eight psychologists (three men and five women) with more than five years of experience in clinical practice. The interviews were analyzed with thematic analysis, generating five themes. Results These were organizational and task specific factors which the participants felt contributed to their compassion fatigue (“mission impossible” and “emotional strain”), experiences of compassion fatigue (“consequences”), interpersonal factors that were perceived as contributing or protecting (“interpersonal factors”), and individual factors that were perceived as protecting (“shielding and strengthening factors”). Conclusions It was found that all of the participants had experienced negative impact of compassion fatigue on their personal lives. A large quantity of patients, and complex patient cases, as well as high expectations on the psychologists were experienced as contributing factors. Collegial support, an empathetic boss, a high degree of agency at work, and fulfiling activities outside of work were experienced as protecting against compassion fatigue.
topic clinical psychologists
compassion fatigue
organizational factors
personal strategies
semi structured interviews
sweden
thematic analysis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1785610
work_keys_str_mv AT malinnorrmanharling breakingthetabooeightswedishclinicalpsychologistsexperiencesofcompassionfatigue
AT elisabethhogman breakingthetabooeightswedishclinicalpsychologistsexperiencesofcompassionfatigue
AT elinorschad breakingthetabooeightswedishclinicalpsychologistsexperiencesofcompassionfatigue
_version_ 1724233017328664576