Subsidies and efficiency in forestry co-operatives.

Private forestry in the Federal Republic of Germany mainly consists of small holdings. Out of 534,000 proprietors 97% own 0.01â10.0 ha. This category covers 45% (1.4 million ha) of private woodlands in total. During the last decades cooperation has increased so that now about 50% of the s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brabänder, H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 1981-01-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Online Access:https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/5104
id doaj-7df36c6f001846b0a9a10a23b5eb0c51
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7df36c6f001846b0a9a10a23b5eb0c512020-11-25T03:54:23ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40751981-01-0115110.14214/sf.a15045Subsidies and efficiency in forestry co-operatives.Brabänder, H. Private forestry in the Federal Republic of Germany mainly consists of small holdings. Out of 534,000 proprietors 97% own 0.01â10.0 ha. This category covers 45% (1.4 million ha) of private woodlands in total. During the last decades cooperation has increased so that now about 50% of the small woodland is managed by voluntary cooperatives. The main aim of the cooperatives is the improvement of management by trying to overcome the disadvantages arising from small size, unfavourable location and splitting up, as well as from insufficient accessibility and other structural difficulties. An economic analysis of forestry cooperatives was conducted by using a combination of model calculations and field investigations of 20 forestry cooperatives which represented different types of cooperation in all regions of the country. The theoretical calculations showed the amplitude of efficiency improvement in small holdings by means of cooperation. It was shown that there were relatively poor results in the beginning and success could be achieved only in the long-term view by improving quality of stands. According to the analysis of the 20 cooperatives, the possible annual cutting rate was 4.1 m/ha, but the actual cutting rate reached only 3.7 m/ha. Aims of the cooperatives manly concerned coordination of production, mechanization, material acquisition and timber sales. The subsidization of forestry cooperatives proved, in general, to be insufficient. A discussion of different ways of subsidization showed that from the microeconomic point of view direct product subsidies of timber production may be more favourable than area-based grants.33https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/5104
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brabänder, H.
spellingShingle Brabänder, H.
Subsidies and efficiency in forestry co-operatives.
Silva Fennica
author_facet Brabänder, H.
author_sort Brabänder, H.
title Subsidies and efficiency in forestry co-operatives.
title_short Subsidies and efficiency in forestry co-operatives.
title_full Subsidies and efficiency in forestry co-operatives.
title_fullStr Subsidies and efficiency in forestry co-operatives.
title_full_unstemmed Subsidies and efficiency in forestry co-operatives.
title_sort subsidies and efficiency in forestry co-operatives.
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
series Silva Fennica
issn 2242-4075
publishDate 1981-01-01
description Private forestry in the Federal Republic of Germany mainly consists of small holdings. Out of 534,000 proprietors 97% own 0.01â10.0 ha. This category covers 45% (1.4 million ha) of private woodlands in total. During the last decades cooperation has increased so that now about 50% of the small woodland is managed by voluntary cooperatives. The main aim of the cooperatives is the improvement of management by trying to overcome the disadvantages arising from small size, unfavourable location and splitting up, as well as from insufficient accessibility and other structural difficulties. An economic analysis of forestry cooperatives was conducted by using a combination of model calculations and field investigations of 20 forestry cooperatives which represented different types of cooperation in all regions of the country. The theoretical calculations showed the amplitude of efficiency improvement in small holdings by means of cooperation. It was shown that there were relatively poor results in the beginning and success could be achieved only in the long-term view by improving quality of stands. According to the analysis of the 20 cooperatives, the possible annual cutting rate was 4.1 m/ha, but the actual cutting rate reached only 3.7 m/ha. Aims of the cooperatives manly concerned coordination of production, mechanization, material acquisition and timber sales. The subsidization of forestry cooperatives proved, in general, to be insufficient. A discussion of different ways of subsidization showed that from the microeconomic point of view direct product subsidies of timber production may be more favourable than area-based grants.33
url https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/5104
work_keys_str_mv AT brabanderh subsidiesandefficiencyinforestrycooperatives
_version_ 1724473961465511936