Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability

Abstract The frequency-following response (FFR) provides a measure of phase-locked auditory encoding in humans and has been used to study subcortical processing in the auditory system. While effects of experience on the FFR have been reported, few studies have examined whether individual differences...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katherine S. Reis, Shannon L. M. Heald, John P. Veillette, Stephen C. Van Hedger, Howard C. Nusbaum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93312-7
id doaj-7de6c221717745feb289769dc3d3d84e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7de6c221717745feb289769dc3d3d84e2021-07-18T11:26:37ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-07-0111111010.1038/s41598-021-93312-7Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling abilityKatherine S. Reis0Shannon L. M. Heald1John P. Veillette2Stephen C. Van Hedger3Howard C. Nusbaum4Department of Psychology, The University of ChicagoDepartment of Psychology, The University of ChicagoDepartment of Psychology, The University of ChicagoDepartment of Psychology, Huron University CollegeDepartment of Psychology, The University of ChicagoAbstract The frequency-following response (FFR) provides a measure of phase-locked auditory encoding in humans and has been used to study subcortical processing in the auditory system. While effects of experience on the FFR have been reported, few studies have examined whether individual differences in early sensory encoding have measurable effects on human performance. Absolute pitch (AP), the rare ability to label musical notes without reference notes, provides an excellent model system for testing how early neural encoding supports specialized auditory skills. Results show that the FFR predicts pitch labelling performance better than traditional measures related to AP (age of music onset, tonal language experience, pitch adjustment and just-noticeable-difference scores). Moreover, the stimulus type used to elicit the FFR (tones or speech) impacts predictive performance in a manner that is consistent with prior research. Additionally, the FFR predicts labelling performance for piano tones better than unfamiliar sine tones. Taken together, the FFR reliably distinguishes individuals based on their explicit pitch labeling abilities, which highlights the complex dynamics between sensory processing and cognition.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93312-7
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katherine S. Reis
Shannon L. M. Heald
John P. Veillette
Stephen C. Van Hedger
Howard C. Nusbaum
spellingShingle Katherine S. Reis
Shannon L. M. Heald
John P. Veillette
Stephen C. Van Hedger
Howard C. Nusbaum
Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
Scientific Reports
author_facet Katherine S. Reis
Shannon L. M. Heald
John P. Veillette
Stephen C. Van Hedger
Howard C. Nusbaum
author_sort Katherine S. Reis
title Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
title_short Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
title_full Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
title_fullStr Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
title_sort individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract The frequency-following response (FFR) provides a measure of phase-locked auditory encoding in humans and has been used to study subcortical processing in the auditory system. While effects of experience on the FFR have been reported, few studies have examined whether individual differences in early sensory encoding have measurable effects on human performance. Absolute pitch (AP), the rare ability to label musical notes without reference notes, provides an excellent model system for testing how early neural encoding supports specialized auditory skills. Results show that the FFR predicts pitch labelling performance better than traditional measures related to AP (age of music onset, tonal language experience, pitch adjustment and just-noticeable-difference scores). Moreover, the stimulus type used to elicit the FFR (tones or speech) impacts predictive performance in a manner that is consistent with prior research. Additionally, the FFR predicts labelling performance for piano tones better than unfamiliar sine tones. Taken together, the FFR reliably distinguishes individuals based on their explicit pitch labeling abilities, which highlights the complex dynamics between sensory processing and cognition.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93312-7
work_keys_str_mv AT katherinesreis individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability
AT shannonlmheald individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability
AT johnpveillette individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability
AT stephencvanhedger individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability
AT howardcnusbaum individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability
_version_ 1721296129356726272