Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability
Abstract The frequency-following response (FFR) provides a measure of phase-locked auditory encoding in humans and has been used to study subcortical processing in the auditory system. While effects of experience on the FFR have been reported, few studies have examined whether individual differences...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93312-7 |
id |
doaj-7de6c221717745feb289769dc3d3d84e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7de6c221717745feb289769dc3d3d84e2021-07-18T11:26:37ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-07-0111111010.1038/s41598-021-93312-7Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling abilityKatherine S. Reis0Shannon L. M. Heald1John P. Veillette2Stephen C. Van Hedger3Howard C. Nusbaum4Department of Psychology, The University of ChicagoDepartment of Psychology, The University of ChicagoDepartment of Psychology, The University of ChicagoDepartment of Psychology, Huron University CollegeDepartment of Psychology, The University of ChicagoAbstract The frequency-following response (FFR) provides a measure of phase-locked auditory encoding in humans and has been used to study subcortical processing in the auditory system. While effects of experience on the FFR have been reported, few studies have examined whether individual differences in early sensory encoding have measurable effects on human performance. Absolute pitch (AP), the rare ability to label musical notes without reference notes, provides an excellent model system for testing how early neural encoding supports specialized auditory skills. Results show that the FFR predicts pitch labelling performance better than traditional measures related to AP (age of music onset, tonal language experience, pitch adjustment and just-noticeable-difference scores). Moreover, the stimulus type used to elicit the FFR (tones or speech) impacts predictive performance in a manner that is consistent with prior research. Additionally, the FFR predicts labelling performance for piano tones better than unfamiliar sine tones. Taken together, the FFR reliably distinguishes individuals based on their explicit pitch labeling abilities, which highlights the complex dynamics between sensory processing and cognition.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93312-7 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Katherine S. Reis Shannon L. M. Heald John P. Veillette Stephen C. Van Hedger Howard C. Nusbaum |
spellingShingle |
Katherine S. Reis Shannon L. M. Heald John P. Veillette Stephen C. Van Hedger Howard C. Nusbaum Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Katherine S. Reis Shannon L. M. Heald John P. Veillette Stephen C. Van Hedger Howard C. Nusbaum |
author_sort |
Katherine S. Reis |
title |
Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
title_short |
Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
title_full |
Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
title_fullStr |
Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
title_sort |
individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Abstract The frequency-following response (FFR) provides a measure of phase-locked auditory encoding in humans and has been used to study subcortical processing in the auditory system. While effects of experience on the FFR have been reported, few studies have examined whether individual differences in early sensory encoding have measurable effects on human performance. Absolute pitch (AP), the rare ability to label musical notes without reference notes, provides an excellent model system for testing how early neural encoding supports specialized auditory skills. Results show that the FFR predicts pitch labelling performance better than traditional measures related to AP (age of music onset, tonal language experience, pitch adjustment and just-noticeable-difference scores). Moreover, the stimulus type used to elicit the FFR (tones or speech) impacts predictive performance in a manner that is consistent with prior research. Additionally, the FFR predicts labelling performance for piano tones better than unfamiliar sine tones. Taken together, the FFR reliably distinguishes individuals based on their explicit pitch labeling abilities, which highlights the complex dynamics between sensory processing and cognition. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93312-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT katherinesreis individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability AT shannonlmheald individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability AT johnpveillette individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability AT stephencvanhedger individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability AT howardcnusbaum individualdifferencesinhumanfrequencyfollowingresponsepredictpitchlabelingability |
_version_ |
1721296129356726272 |