Large Group Regression and the Emergence of Psychopolitical Criminality
This article examines criminality that can emerge within the context of a political party’s large group regression. The group behavior of the Democratic party after its loss in the 2016 United States Presidential election serves as a case that illustrates this concept. Psychoanalytic concepts discus...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Open Political Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2019-0013 |
id |
doaj-7de3c4b933ed448fbf9e20024fc80c5e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7de3c4b933ed448fbf9e20024fc80c5e2021-10-02T17:48:51ZengDe GruyterOpen Political Science2543-80422019-12-012112012710.1515/openps-2019-0013openps-2019-0013Large Group Regression and the Emergence of Psychopolitical CriminalityUmbrasas Karl0Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA, United StatesThis article examines criminality that can emerge within the context of a political party’s large group regression. The group behavior of the Democratic party after its loss in the 2016 United States Presidential election serves as a case that illustrates this concept. Psychoanalytic concepts discussed by Vamik Volkan are used as the framework for understanding the party’s group behavior. Since its loss in the election, the Democratic party has demonstrated remarkable coherence in its hostility towards Republicans. The hostility has ranged from uncivil behavior to violence manifested across a range of socioeconomic statuses and locations. The steep decline in the Democratic party’s civility towards its opponent is indicative of a large group regression. The loss of the 2016 Presidential election precipitated the party’s regression, which has left its members responding in primitive psychological ways. A range of criminality has emerged within this regressed state, such as assault, battery, and false police allegations. The regressed state of the party leaves it vulnerable to malignant narcissistic leadership or dysfunctional ideologies, which can normalize the regressive behavior. The large group regression examined in this paper may apply to other Western societies that experience dramatic sociopolitical change.https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2019-0013psychoanalysisregressiongroupspoliticscrime |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Umbrasas Karl |
spellingShingle |
Umbrasas Karl Large Group Regression and the Emergence of Psychopolitical Criminality Open Political Science psychoanalysis regression groups politics crime |
author_facet |
Umbrasas Karl |
author_sort |
Umbrasas Karl |
title |
Large Group Regression and the Emergence of Psychopolitical Criminality |
title_short |
Large Group Regression and the Emergence of Psychopolitical Criminality |
title_full |
Large Group Regression and the Emergence of Psychopolitical Criminality |
title_fullStr |
Large Group Regression and the Emergence of Psychopolitical Criminality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Large Group Regression and the Emergence of Psychopolitical Criminality |
title_sort |
large group regression and the emergence of psychopolitical criminality |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Political Science |
issn |
2543-8042 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
This article examines criminality that can emerge within the context of a political party’s large group regression. The group behavior of the Democratic party after its loss in the 2016 United States Presidential election serves as a case that illustrates this concept. Psychoanalytic concepts discussed by Vamik Volkan are used as the framework for understanding the party’s group behavior. Since its loss in the election, the Democratic party has demonstrated remarkable coherence in its hostility towards Republicans. The hostility has ranged from uncivil behavior to violence manifested across a range of socioeconomic statuses and locations. The steep decline in the Democratic party’s civility towards its opponent is indicative of a large group regression. The loss of the 2016 Presidential election precipitated the party’s regression, which has left its members responding in primitive psychological ways. A range of criminality has emerged within this regressed state, such as assault, battery, and false police allegations. The regressed state of the party leaves it vulnerable to malignant narcissistic leadership or dysfunctional ideologies, which can normalize the regressive behavior. The large group regression examined in this paper may apply to other Western societies that experience dramatic sociopolitical change. |
topic |
psychoanalysis regression groups politics crime |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2019-0013 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT umbrasaskarl largegroupregressionandtheemergenceofpsychopoliticalcriminality |
_version_ |
1716850398196662272 |