Basına Yansımalarıyla “1952 Amatörlük Olayı” Ve Türk Sporunda Amatörlük (“1952 Amateurism Event” With Its Reflections on the Press and Amateurism in Turkey)

Sportsmanship, a profession in today’s world, has its amateurism and professionalism lines intertwined. Sportsmen legally seen as amateurs in many sports fields are known to earn more than the professionals accepted to be in the high earning range. The study investigates the concept of amateurism in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Selami ÖZSOY
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dokuz Eylul University 2011-04-01
Series:Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sbe.deu.edu.tr/dergi/cilt13.%20say%C4%B12/OZSOY.pdf
id doaj-7dd80183c7d04dd3b98ad42eea7e4d85
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7dd80183c7d04dd3b98ad42eea7e4d852020-11-25T03:43:04ZengDokuz Eylul UniversityDokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi1302-32842011-04-0113297119Basına Yansımalarıyla “1952 Amatörlük Olayı” Ve Türk Sporunda Amatörlük (“1952 Amateurism Event” With Its Reflections on the Press and Amateurism in Turkey)Selami ÖZSOYSportsmanship, a profession in today’s world, has its amateurism and professionalism lines intertwined. Sportsmen legally seen as amateurs in many sports fields are known to earn more than the professionals accepted to be in the high earning range. The study investigates the concept of amateurism in sports in the context of the decision taken for wrestlers and athlete whose amateur status was not approved by the Turkish National Olympics Committee since the above mentioned sportsmen had accepted presents in 1948 London Olympics after they earned medals. The study reviewed the news and comments published in newspapers Akşam, Cumhuriyet, Hürriyet, Milliyet and Vatan in the period of 1948 London and 1952 Helsinki Olympics. According to the results, papers published that sportsmen were often given warnings about not to damaging the amateurism rule while they were presented with awards. The decision taken by the Turkish National Olympics Committee prior to 1952 Helsinki Olympics were criticized harshly in the news and comments published in those newspapers. The decision taken by the Turkish National Olympics Committee prior to 1952 Helsinki Olympics was discussed considerably during and after the games. It can be argues that this decision has lost its rationale by the changes in the concept of amateurism in Olympics in the 50 years that passed by.http://www.sbe.deu.edu.tr/dergi/cilt13.%20say%C4%B12/OZSOY.pdfOlympicsAmateurismPress.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Selami ÖZSOY
spellingShingle Selami ÖZSOY
Basına Yansımalarıyla “1952 Amatörlük Olayı” Ve Türk Sporunda Amatörlük (“1952 Amateurism Event” With Its Reflections on the Press and Amateurism in Turkey)
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
Olympics
Amateurism
Press.
author_facet Selami ÖZSOY
author_sort Selami ÖZSOY
title Basına Yansımalarıyla “1952 Amatörlük Olayı” Ve Türk Sporunda Amatörlük (“1952 Amateurism Event” With Its Reflections on the Press and Amateurism in Turkey)
title_short Basına Yansımalarıyla “1952 Amatörlük Olayı” Ve Türk Sporunda Amatörlük (“1952 Amateurism Event” With Its Reflections on the Press and Amateurism in Turkey)
title_full Basına Yansımalarıyla “1952 Amatörlük Olayı” Ve Türk Sporunda Amatörlük (“1952 Amateurism Event” With Its Reflections on the Press and Amateurism in Turkey)
title_fullStr Basına Yansımalarıyla “1952 Amatörlük Olayı” Ve Türk Sporunda Amatörlük (“1952 Amateurism Event” With Its Reflections on the Press and Amateurism in Turkey)
title_full_unstemmed Basına Yansımalarıyla “1952 Amatörlük Olayı” Ve Türk Sporunda Amatörlük (“1952 Amateurism Event” With Its Reflections on the Press and Amateurism in Turkey)
title_sort basına yansımalarıyla “1952 amatörlük olayı” ve türk sporunda amatörlük (“1952 amateurism event” with its reflections on the press and amateurism in turkey)
publisher Dokuz Eylul University
series Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
issn 1302-3284
publishDate 2011-04-01
description Sportsmanship, a profession in today’s world, has its amateurism and professionalism lines intertwined. Sportsmen legally seen as amateurs in many sports fields are known to earn more than the professionals accepted to be in the high earning range. The study investigates the concept of amateurism in sports in the context of the decision taken for wrestlers and athlete whose amateur status was not approved by the Turkish National Olympics Committee since the above mentioned sportsmen had accepted presents in 1948 London Olympics after they earned medals. The study reviewed the news and comments published in newspapers Akşam, Cumhuriyet, Hürriyet, Milliyet and Vatan in the period of 1948 London and 1952 Helsinki Olympics. According to the results, papers published that sportsmen were often given warnings about not to damaging the amateurism rule while they were presented with awards. The decision taken by the Turkish National Olympics Committee prior to 1952 Helsinki Olympics were criticized harshly in the news and comments published in those newspapers. The decision taken by the Turkish National Olympics Committee prior to 1952 Helsinki Olympics was discussed considerably during and after the games. It can be argues that this decision has lost its rationale by the changes in the concept of amateurism in Olympics in the 50 years that passed by.
topic Olympics
Amateurism
Press.
url http://www.sbe.deu.edu.tr/dergi/cilt13.%20say%C4%B12/OZSOY.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT selamiozsoy basınayansımalarıyla1952amatorlukolayıveturksporundaamatorluk1952amateurismeventwithitsreflectionsonthepressandamateurisminturkey
_version_ 1724521475098017792