Assessing the validity of abbreviated literature searches for rapid reviews: protocol of a non-inferiority and meta-epidemiologic study
Abstract Background Systematic reviews offer the most reliable and valid support for health policy decision-making, patient information, and guideline development. However, they are labor intensive and frequently take longer than 1 year to complete. Consequently, they often do not meet the needs of...
Main Authors: | Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Irma Klerings, Gernot Wagner, Viktoria Titscher, Gerald Gartlehner |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-016-0380-8 |
Similar Items
-
Combining abbreviated literature searches with single-reviewer screening: three case studies of rapid reviews
by: Lisa Affengruber, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Types of abbreviations in terms of shipbuilding in Germanic and Slavic languages
by: Bespamyatnaya Liliya Vladimirovna
Published: (2015-06-01) -
Abbreviation as a Way of Coining Neologisms in Mass Media
by: V. B. Velykoroda, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Model of the decryption and model of the abbreviation formal diversity in the abbreviation group “auto-”
by: Alamayrekh Yekaterina Yu.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Abbreviated appelatives as independent modifications of abbreviations
by: Vyacheslav I. Terkulov
Published: (2020-12-01)