Standards of Social Research

As moderators of the FQS' debate on the standards of qualitative social research, we remind the participants and the readers of the vastness and the variety of criteria involved in the discourse of philosophy of science. We present impressions on the change of these criteria in recent discussio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Franz Breuer, Jo Reichertz
Format:	Article
Language:	deu
Published:	FQS 2001-09-01
Series:	Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:	goodness criteria of science quality standards of science evaluation of science philosophy of science theory of knowledge and understanding historical change of goodness criteria context of justification context of discovery probity ethics methodological appropriateness practical relevance self representation of scientists
Online Access:	http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/919

id	doaj-7da767dc614e41bba81d828075e31674
record_format	Article
spelling	doaj-7da767dc614e41bba81d828075e316742020-11-24T23:28:24ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272001-09-0123906Standards of Social ResearchFranz Breuer0Jo Reichertz1Universität MünsterKulturwissenschaftlichen Institut (KWI) EssenAs moderators of the FQS' debate on the standards of qualitative social research, we remind the participants and the readers of the vastness and the variety of criteria involved in the discourse of philosophy of science. We present impressions on the change of these criteria in recent discussions. We urge the participants of this debate to become aware of the systematic and historical character of postulated criteria. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0103245http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/919goodness criteria of sciencequality standards of scienceevaluation of sciencephilosophy of sciencetheory of knowledge and understandinghistorical change of goodness criteriacontext of justificationcontext of discoveryprobityethicsmethodological appropriatenesspractical relevanceself representation of scientists
collection	DOAJ
language	deu
format	Article
sources	DOAJ
author	Franz Breuer Jo Reichertz
spellingShingle	Franz Breuer Jo Reichertz Standards of Social Research Forum: Qualitative Social Research goodness criteria of science quality standards of science evaluation of science philosophy of science theory of knowledge and understanding historical change of goodness criteria context of justification context of discovery probity ethics methodological appropriateness practical relevance self representation of scientists
author_facet	Franz Breuer Jo Reichertz
author_sort	Franz Breuer
title	Standards of Social Research
title_short	Standards of Social Research
title_full	Standards of Social Research
title_fullStr	Standards of Social Research
title_full_unstemmed	Standards of Social Research
title_sort	standards of social research
publisher	FQS
series	Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn	1438-5627
publishDate	2001-09-01
description	As moderators of the FQS' debate on the standards of qualitative social research, we remind the participants and the readers of the vastness and the variety of criteria involved in the discourse of philosophy of science. We present impressions on the change of these criteria in recent discussions. We urge the participants of this debate to become aware of the systematic and historical character of postulated criteria. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0103245
topic	goodness criteria of science quality standards of science evaluation of science philosophy of science theory of knowledge and understanding historical change of goodness criteria context of justification context of discovery probity ethics methodological appropriateness practical relevance self representation of scientists
url	http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/919
work_keys_str_mv	AT franzbreuer standardsofsocialresearch AT joreichertz standardsofsocialresearch
_version_	1725549323350966272

Standards of Social Research

Similar Items