Comparison of tear function following laser <i>in situ</i> keratomileusis with two femtosecond laser platforms

AIM: To evaluate changes in tear function and corneal staining in patients who underwent laser <i>in situ </i>keratomileusis(LASIK)using two different femtosecond lasers.<p>METHODS:Forty eyes underwent FS200 and 40 eyes underwent VisuMax. The tear film break-up time(TBUT), Schirmer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li-Na Liu, Xing-Wu Zhong, Hai-Bo Chen, Jian-Qiang Xing, Ting-Fei Wu, Xiao-Lian Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2014-05-01
Series:Guoji Yanke Zazhi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/5/201405028.pdf
id doaj-7da496c3f95c4920930425499089d582
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7da496c3f95c4920930425499089d5822020-11-25T00:39:37ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)Guoji Yanke Zazhi1672-51231672-51232014-05-0114588288410.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.05.28Comparison of tear function following laser <i>in situ</i> keratomileusis with two femtosecond laser platformsLi-Na Liu0Xing-Wu Zhong1Hai-Bo Chen2Jian-Qiang Xing3Ting-Fei Wu4Xiao-Lian Chen5Hainan Eye Hospital, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Haikou 570311, Hainan Province, ChinaHainan Eye Hospital, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Haikou 570311, Hainan Province, ChinaHainan Eye Hospital, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Haikou 570311, Hainan Province, ChinaHainan Eye Hospital, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Haikou 570311, Hainan Province, ChinaHainan Eye Hospital, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Haikou 570311, Hainan Province, ChinaHainan Eye Hospital, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Haikou 570311, Hainan Province, ChinaAIM: To evaluate changes in tear function and corneal staining in patients who underwent laser <i>in situ </i>keratomileusis(LASIK)using two different femtosecond lasers.<p>METHODS:Forty eyes underwent FS200 and 40 eyes underwent VisuMax. The tear film break-up time(TBUT), Schirmer I test(SⅠt)and fluorescein staining were assessed preoperatively at 1wk; 1 and 3mo postoperatively. The analysis of variance(ANOVA)for repeat measurements or Kruskal—Wallis ranks test were used. For the differences between FS200 and VisuMax-operated eyes, a independent-samples <i>t</i> test or Wilcoxon matched-samples rank sum test were used.<p>RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in any clinical outcome measure between the two kinds of lasers(<i>P<</i>0.05), although there was a trend towards slightly reductions for TBUT in FS200-operated eyes. TBUT of the two groups eyes showed the same reductions(<i>F</i>=100.37, <i>P</i><0.01; <i>F</i>=112.25, <i>P</i><0.01)when compared preoperative levels to 1wk; 1 and 3mo postoperatively levels. Moreover, there were obvious decreases of the Schirmer Ⅰ test were observed on any visit after the operation for both groups(<i>F</i>=42.15, <i>P</i><0.01; <i>F</i>=37.27, <i>P</i><0.01). Furthermore, corneal staining was significantly increased at 1wk postoperatively(FS200 <i>Z</i>=4.88, <i>P</i><0.01; VisuMax <i>Z</i>=4.28, <i>P</i><0.01)after LASIK compared to preoperative conditions, and recovered to the level of preoperative at 1mo postoperatively. <p>CONCLUSION: This study shows that changes in TBUT,Schirmer I test and corneal staining are statistically similar in LASIK using FS200 and VisuMax femtosecond lasers for flap creation. However, the VisuMax-operated eyes of TBUT after LASIK have faster recovery than in FS200 eyes.http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/5/201405028.pdffemtosecond lasercorneal stainingtear film break-up timeSchirmer's testSchirmer's test
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Li-Na Liu
Xing-Wu Zhong
Hai-Bo Chen
Jian-Qiang Xing
Ting-Fei Wu
Xiao-Lian Chen
spellingShingle Li-Na Liu
Xing-Wu Zhong
Hai-Bo Chen
Jian-Qiang Xing
Ting-Fei Wu
Xiao-Lian Chen
Comparison of tear function following laser <i>in situ</i> keratomileusis with two femtosecond laser platforms
Guoji Yanke Zazhi
femtosecond laser
corneal staining
tear film break-up time
Schirmer's test
Schirmer's test
author_facet Li-Na Liu
Xing-Wu Zhong
Hai-Bo Chen
Jian-Qiang Xing
Ting-Fei Wu
Xiao-Lian Chen
author_sort Li-Na Liu
title Comparison of tear function following laser <i>in situ</i> keratomileusis with two femtosecond laser platforms
title_short Comparison of tear function following laser <i>in situ</i> keratomileusis with two femtosecond laser platforms
title_full Comparison of tear function following laser <i>in situ</i> keratomileusis with two femtosecond laser platforms
title_fullStr Comparison of tear function following laser <i>in situ</i> keratomileusis with two femtosecond laser platforms
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of tear function following laser <i>in situ</i> keratomileusis with two femtosecond laser platforms
title_sort comparison of tear function following laser <i>in situ</i> keratomileusis with two femtosecond laser platforms
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
series Guoji Yanke Zazhi
issn 1672-5123
1672-5123
publishDate 2014-05-01
description AIM: To evaluate changes in tear function and corneal staining in patients who underwent laser <i>in situ </i>keratomileusis(LASIK)using two different femtosecond lasers.<p>METHODS:Forty eyes underwent FS200 and 40 eyes underwent VisuMax. The tear film break-up time(TBUT), Schirmer I test(SⅠt)and fluorescein staining were assessed preoperatively at 1wk; 1 and 3mo postoperatively. The analysis of variance(ANOVA)for repeat measurements or Kruskal—Wallis ranks test were used. For the differences between FS200 and VisuMax-operated eyes, a independent-samples <i>t</i> test or Wilcoxon matched-samples rank sum test were used.<p>RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in any clinical outcome measure between the two kinds of lasers(<i>P<</i>0.05), although there was a trend towards slightly reductions for TBUT in FS200-operated eyes. TBUT of the two groups eyes showed the same reductions(<i>F</i>=100.37, <i>P</i><0.01; <i>F</i>=112.25, <i>P</i><0.01)when compared preoperative levels to 1wk; 1 and 3mo postoperatively levels. Moreover, there were obvious decreases of the Schirmer Ⅰ test were observed on any visit after the operation for both groups(<i>F</i>=42.15, <i>P</i><0.01; <i>F</i>=37.27, <i>P</i><0.01). Furthermore, corneal staining was significantly increased at 1wk postoperatively(FS200 <i>Z</i>=4.88, <i>P</i><0.01; VisuMax <i>Z</i>=4.28, <i>P</i><0.01)after LASIK compared to preoperative conditions, and recovered to the level of preoperative at 1mo postoperatively. <p>CONCLUSION: This study shows that changes in TBUT,Schirmer I test and corneal staining are statistically similar in LASIK using FS200 and VisuMax femtosecond lasers for flap creation. However, the VisuMax-operated eyes of TBUT after LASIK have faster recovery than in FS200 eyes.
topic femtosecond laser
corneal staining
tear film break-up time
Schirmer's test
Schirmer's test
url http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2014/5/201405028.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT linaliu comparisonoftearfunctionfollowinglaseriinsituikeratomileusiswithtwofemtosecondlaserplatforms
AT xingwuzhong comparisonoftearfunctionfollowinglaseriinsituikeratomileusiswithtwofemtosecondlaserplatforms
AT haibochen comparisonoftearfunctionfollowinglaseriinsituikeratomileusiswithtwofemtosecondlaserplatforms
AT jianqiangxing comparisonoftearfunctionfollowinglaseriinsituikeratomileusiswithtwofemtosecondlaserplatforms
AT tingfeiwu comparisonoftearfunctionfollowinglaseriinsituikeratomileusiswithtwofemtosecondlaserplatforms
AT xiaolianchen comparisonoftearfunctionfollowinglaseriinsituikeratomileusiswithtwofemtosecondlaserplatforms
_version_ 1725293407614533632