Multiplicity and Welt

This article interprets Jakob von Uexküll’s understanding of different beings’ Innenwelt, Gegenwelt, and umwelt through Deleuzian insights of multiplicity, context, and particularity. This Deleuzian interpolation into Uexküll’s insights acknowledges the absence of a unitary ‘human’ view of nature,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yogi Hale Hendlin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tartu Press 2016-07-01
Series:Sign Systems Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15911
id doaj-7d8d7af06b054f58991a78f09fe6b796
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d8d7af06b054f58991a78f09fe6b7962021-04-02T08:49:16ZengUniversity of Tartu PressSign Systems Studies1406-42431736-74092016-07-01441/210.12697/SSS.2016.44.1-2.06Multiplicity and WeltYogi Hale Hendlin0Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 530 Parnassus Ave., Suite 366, San Francisco, CA, 94143–1390 This article interprets Jakob von Uexküll’s understanding of different beings’ Innenwelt, Gegenwelt, and umwelt through Deleuzian insights of multiplicity, context, and particularity. This Deleuzian interpolation into Uexküll’s insights acknowledges the absence of a unitary ‘human’ view of nature, recognizing instead that plural viewpoints of cultures, subgroups and individuals understand and interpret natural signs variously not just because of ideology but because of physiology and contrastive fundamental ways of accessing the world. Recent formative research in comparative neurobiology suggests that universal anthropological claims of cross-cultural semiotic similarity are incorrect. Interpreting biosemiotics as the investigation of apprehending the Innenwelt of radically different others (species), such semiotic understandings themselves are not necessarily generalizable between different members of the same species in a group, same-species groups in different natural cultural contexts, or even (as with humans) the same animal at different points of time (based on new understandings, patterns, or events of meaning altering interpretations of self and events). Conjoining Deleuze’s insights of the complexity of multiplicity with Uexküll’s scientific-imaginative system of comprehending other creatures’ ways of understanding their world offers an increased self-reflexivity regarding the simultaneous levels of actual semiotic activity for biosemiotic inquiry. https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15911biosemioticsGilles DeleuzeJakob von Uexküllfunctional circledifferent levels of semiosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yogi Hale Hendlin
spellingShingle Yogi Hale Hendlin
Multiplicity and Welt
Sign Systems Studies
biosemiotics
Gilles Deleuze
Jakob von Uexküll
functional circle
different levels of semiosis
author_facet Yogi Hale Hendlin
author_sort Yogi Hale Hendlin
title Multiplicity and Welt
title_short Multiplicity and Welt
title_full Multiplicity and Welt
title_fullStr Multiplicity and Welt
title_full_unstemmed Multiplicity and Welt
title_sort multiplicity and welt
publisher University of Tartu Press
series Sign Systems Studies
issn 1406-4243
1736-7409
publishDate 2016-07-01
description This article interprets Jakob von Uexküll’s understanding of different beings’ Innenwelt, Gegenwelt, and umwelt through Deleuzian insights of multiplicity, context, and particularity. This Deleuzian interpolation into Uexküll’s insights acknowledges the absence of a unitary ‘human’ view of nature, recognizing instead that plural viewpoints of cultures, subgroups and individuals understand and interpret natural signs variously not just because of ideology but because of physiology and contrastive fundamental ways of accessing the world. Recent formative research in comparative neurobiology suggests that universal anthropological claims of cross-cultural semiotic similarity are incorrect. Interpreting biosemiotics as the investigation of apprehending the Innenwelt of radically different others (species), such semiotic understandings themselves are not necessarily generalizable between different members of the same species in a group, same-species groups in different natural cultural contexts, or even (as with humans) the same animal at different points of time (based on new understandings, patterns, or events of meaning altering interpretations of self and events). Conjoining Deleuze’s insights of the complexity of multiplicity with Uexküll’s scientific-imaginative system of comprehending other creatures’ ways of understanding their world offers an increased self-reflexivity regarding the simultaneous levels of actual semiotic activity for biosemiotic inquiry.
topic biosemiotics
Gilles Deleuze
Jakob von Uexküll
functional circle
different levels of semiosis
url https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15911
work_keys_str_mv AT yogihalehendlin multiplicityandwelt
_version_ 1724170134515351552