Determinants of family physicians’ workload

Methods: We performed a nationwide cross sectional study on a representative sample of 50 randomly selected family physicians in Slovenia; 41 out of 50, each collecting data from 300 consecutive encounters, participated in the study. We collected data from 12,297 office contacts and home visits. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gordana Živčec Kalan, Marija Petek Šter, Janko Kersnik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Slovenian Medical Association 2012-06-01
Series:Zdravniški Vestnik
Online Access:http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/582
id doaj-7d8127530eb1405ba723ad7c95a63ce6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d8127530eb1405ba723ad7c95a63ce62020-11-24T23:31:39ZengSlovenian Medical AssociationZdravniški Vestnik1318-03471581-02242012-06-01816474Determinants of family physicians’ workloadGordana Živčec KalanMarija Petek ŠterJanko KersnikMethods: We performed a nationwide cross sectional study on a representative sample of 50 randomly selected family physicians in Slovenia; 41 out of 50, each collecting data from 300 consecutive encounters, participated in the study. We collected data from 12,297 office contacts and home visits. The workload was defined with activities and with a stopwatch-measured time spent during consultations with/for patients by a family physician on a typical working day. We analysed patients’ characteristics, physicians’ style of work and the influence of the working environment. Results: Practices differed 3.70 times in the number of patients on the list, 3.84 times in population points, 2.44 times in average age of patients on the list and 2.51 times in the number of doctor-patient encounters per day. We calculated 1.97 time differences (from 0.67 to 1.32) in mean workload. The mean time used for direct work with patients per day was 390.04 minutes (min. 261.22 min, max. 516.67 min, SD 65.18 minutes). The highest impact on the length of work had visits with (p = 0.002) or without (p < 0.001) physical examination and performing medical procedures (p = 0.019) due to their frequency as well as home visits (p = 0.001) and performing coroner duties (p = 0.038) due to the length of time in delivering them. Conclusions: Our observations can be used to develop a model for predicting and/or planning family physicians’ workload in the Slovenian health care system. The model needs to be tested in other countries with a similar (capitation combined with fee for service) payment system in order to determine its universal applicability.http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/582
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gordana Živčec Kalan
Marija Petek Šter
Janko Kersnik
spellingShingle Gordana Živčec Kalan
Marija Petek Šter
Janko Kersnik
Determinants of family physicians’ workload
Zdravniški Vestnik
author_facet Gordana Živčec Kalan
Marija Petek Šter
Janko Kersnik
author_sort Gordana Živčec Kalan
title Determinants of family physicians’ workload
title_short Determinants of family physicians’ workload
title_full Determinants of family physicians’ workload
title_fullStr Determinants of family physicians’ workload
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of family physicians’ workload
title_sort determinants of family physicians’ workload
publisher Slovenian Medical Association
series Zdravniški Vestnik
issn 1318-0347
1581-0224
publishDate 2012-06-01
description Methods: We performed a nationwide cross sectional study on a representative sample of 50 randomly selected family physicians in Slovenia; 41 out of 50, each collecting data from 300 consecutive encounters, participated in the study. We collected data from 12,297 office contacts and home visits. The workload was defined with activities and with a stopwatch-measured time spent during consultations with/for patients by a family physician on a typical working day. We analysed patients’ characteristics, physicians’ style of work and the influence of the working environment. Results: Practices differed 3.70 times in the number of patients on the list, 3.84 times in population points, 2.44 times in average age of patients on the list and 2.51 times in the number of doctor-patient encounters per day. We calculated 1.97 time differences (from 0.67 to 1.32) in mean workload. The mean time used for direct work with patients per day was 390.04 minutes (min. 261.22 min, max. 516.67 min, SD 65.18 minutes). The highest impact on the length of work had visits with (p = 0.002) or without (p < 0.001) physical examination and performing medical procedures (p = 0.019) due to their frequency as well as home visits (p = 0.001) and performing coroner duties (p = 0.038) due to the length of time in delivering them. Conclusions: Our observations can be used to develop a model for predicting and/or planning family physicians’ workload in the Slovenian health care system. The model needs to be tested in other countries with a similar (capitation combined with fee for service) payment system in order to determine its universal applicability.
url http://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/582
work_keys_str_mv AT gordanazivceckalan determinantsoffamilyphysiciansworkload
AT marijapetekster determinantsoffamilyphysiciansworkload
AT jankokersnik determinantsoffamilyphysiciansworkload
_version_ 1725536702201593856