Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh.

Habitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryan J Rezek, Benoit Lebreton, Blair Sterba-Boatwright, Jennifer Beseres Pollack
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5736197?pdf=render
id doaj-7d8022e376a74628bf095288b9e92dfe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d8022e376a74628bf095288b9e92dfe2020-11-25T01:49:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-011212e018987110.1371/journal.pone.0189871Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh.Ryan J RezekBenoit LebretonBlair Sterba-BoatwrightJennifer Beseres PollackHabitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina alterniflora salt marsh and a natural reference habitat over a 2-year period. The restored marsh was successful in providing habitat for economically and ecologically important macrofauna taxa; supporting similar or greater density, biomass, and species richness to the natural reference during all but one sampling period. Stable isotope analyses revealed that communities from the natural and the restored marshes relied on a similar diversity of food resources and that decapods had similar trophic levels. However, some generalist consumers (Palaemonetes spp. and Penaeus aztecus) were more 13C-enriched in the natural marsh, indicating a greater use of macrophyte derived organic matter relative to restored marsh counterparts. This difference was attributed to the higher quantities of macrophyte detritus and organic carbon in natural marsh sediments. Reduced marsh flooding frequency was associated with a reduction in macrofaunal biomass and decapod trophic levels. The restored marsh edge occurred at lower elevations than natural marsh edge, apparently due to reduced fetch and wind-wave exposure provided by the protective berm structures. The lower elevation of the restored marsh edge mitigated negative impacts in sampling periods with low tidal elevations that affected the natural marsh. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering sediment characteristics and elevation in salt marsh constructions.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5736197?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ryan J Rezek
Benoit Lebreton
Blair Sterba-Boatwright
Jennifer Beseres Pollack
spellingShingle Ryan J Rezek
Benoit Lebreton
Blair Sterba-Boatwright
Jennifer Beseres Pollack
Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ryan J Rezek
Benoit Lebreton
Blair Sterba-Boatwright
Jennifer Beseres Pollack
author_sort Ryan J Rezek
title Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh.
title_short Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh.
title_full Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh.
title_fullStr Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh.
title_full_unstemmed Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh.
title_sort ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Habitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina alterniflora salt marsh and a natural reference habitat over a 2-year period. The restored marsh was successful in providing habitat for economically and ecologically important macrofauna taxa; supporting similar or greater density, biomass, and species richness to the natural reference during all but one sampling period. Stable isotope analyses revealed that communities from the natural and the restored marshes relied on a similar diversity of food resources and that decapods had similar trophic levels. However, some generalist consumers (Palaemonetes spp. and Penaeus aztecus) were more 13C-enriched in the natural marsh, indicating a greater use of macrophyte derived organic matter relative to restored marsh counterparts. This difference was attributed to the higher quantities of macrophyte detritus and organic carbon in natural marsh sediments. Reduced marsh flooding frequency was associated with a reduction in macrofaunal biomass and decapod trophic levels. The restored marsh edge occurred at lower elevations than natural marsh edge, apparently due to reduced fetch and wind-wave exposure provided by the protective berm structures. The lower elevation of the restored marsh edge mitigated negative impacts in sampling periods with low tidal elevations that affected the natural marsh. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering sediment characteristics and elevation in salt marsh constructions.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5736197?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanjrezek ecologicalstructureandfunctioninarestoredversusnaturalsaltmarsh
AT benoitlebreton ecologicalstructureandfunctioninarestoredversusnaturalsaltmarsh
AT blairsterbaboatwright ecologicalstructureandfunctioninarestoredversusnaturalsaltmarsh
AT jenniferbeserespollack ecologicalstructureandfunctioninarestoredversusnaturalsaltmarsh
_version_ 1725009281212743680