Faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease: a prospective study

Background: The value of faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) remains to be elucidated. This prospective study was to evaluate the utility of faecal biomarkers for detecting small intestinal inflammation. Methods: A total of 122 consecutive p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takahiro Shimoyama, Takayuki Yamamoto, Satoru Umegae, Koichi Matsumoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-08-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17717683
id doaj-7d7c850360a645518546a8968febc75b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d7c850360a645518546a8968febc75b2020-11-25T03:39:32ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology1756-283X1756-28482017-08-011010.1177/1756283X17717683Faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease: a prospective studyTakahiro ShimoyamaTakayuki YamamotoSatoru UmegaeKoichi MatsumotoBackground: The value of faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) remains to be elucidated. This prospective study was to evaluate the utility of faecal biomarkers for detecting small intestinal inflammation. Methods: A total of 122 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of CD in the small intestine were screened for eligibility. Computed tomography enterography (CTE) was undertaken to evaluate small bowel inflammation followed by colonoscopy to confirm no large bowel involvement. Seventy eligible patients with inflammation confined to the small intestine were included. Faecal samples were collected for assaying calprotectin, lactoferrin and haemoglobin. For assessing the degree of small bowel inflammation, a semi-quantitative scoring system (CTE0, normal; CTE1, mild; CTE2, moderate; CTE3, severe) was applied. Results: The median calprotectin, lactoferrin and haemoglobin levels were significantly higher in patients with small bowel inflammation, CTE scores 1–3 ( n = 42) versus 0 ( n = 28): calprotectin, 330 versus 40 ng/ml, p < 0.0001; lactoferrin, 14 versus 3 ng/ml, p < 0.0001; haemoglobin, 29.5 versus 6.5 ng/ml, p = 0.005. There was a strong positive relationship between the faecal biomarkers and CTE score: calprotectin, p < 0.0001; lactoferrin, p < 0.0001; haemoglobin, p = 0.0004. A cutoff value of 140 ng/ml for calprotectin had a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 82% with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 to detect small bowel inflammation (CTE scores 1–3), while lactoferrin 6 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 79% with an AUC of 0.83, and haemoglobin 9 ng/ml showed a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 39% with an AUC of 0.70. Conclusions: Faecal calprotectin, lactoferrin, and to a lesser degree haemoglobin are relevant biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in CD patients without large bowel involvement. Further well-designed large-scale studies in this clinical setting should strengthen our findings.https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17717683
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Takahiro Shimoyama
Takayuki Yamamoto
Satoru Umegae
Koichi Matsumoto
spellingShingle Takahiro Shimoyama
Takayuki Yamamoto
Satoru Umegae
Koichi Matsumoto
Faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease: a prospective study
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
author_facet Takahiro Shimoyama
Takayuki Yamamoto
Satoru Umegae
Koichi Matsumoto
author_sort Takahiro Shimoyama
title Faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease: a prospective study
title_short Faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease: a prospective study
title_full Faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease: a prospective study
title_fullStr Faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease: a prospective study
title_sort faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with crohn’s disease: a prospective study
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
issn 1756-283X
1756-2848
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Background: The value of faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) remains to be elucidated. This prospective study was to evaluate the utility of faecal biomarkers for detecting small intestinal inflammation. Methods: A total of 122 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of CD in the small intestine were screened for eligibility. Computed tomography enterography (CTE) was undertaken to evaluate small bowel inflammation followed by colonoscopy to confirm no large bowel involvement. Seventy eligible patients with inflammation confined to the small intestine were included. Faecal samples were collected for assaying calprotectin, lactoferrin and haemoglobin. For assessing the degree of small bowel inflammation, a semi-quantitative scoring system (CTE0, normal; CTE1, mild; CTE2, moderate; CTE3, severe) was applied. Results: The median calprotectin, lactoferrin and haemoglobin levels were significantly higher in patients with small bowel inflammation, CTE scores 1–3 ( n = 42) versus 0 ( n = 28): calprotectin, 330 versus 40 ng/ml, p < 0.0001; lactoferrin, 14 versus 3 ng/ml, p < 0.0001; haemoglobin, 29.5 versus 6.5 ng/ml, p = 0.005. There was a strong positive relationship between the faecal biomarkers and CTE score: calprotectin, p < 0.0001; lactoferrin, p < 0.0001; haemoglobin, p = 0.0004. A cutoff value of 140 ng/ml for calprotectin had a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 82% with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 to detect small bowel inflammation (CTE scores 1–3), while lactoferrin 6 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 79% with an AUC of 0.83, and haemoglobin 9 ng/ml showed a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 39% with an AUC of 0.70. Conclusions: Faecal calprotectin, lactoferrin, and to a lesser degree haemoglobin are relevant biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in CD patients without large bowel involvement. Further well-designed large-scale studies in this clinical setting should strengthen our findings.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X17717683
work_keys_str_mv AT takahiroshimoyama faecalbiomarkersforscreeningsmallbowelinflammationinpatientswithcrohnsdiseaseaprospectivestudy
AT takayukiyamamoto faecalbiomarkersforscreeningsmallbowelinflammationinpatientswithcrohnsdiseaseaprospectivestudy
AT satoruumegae faecalbiomarkersforscreeningsmallbowelinflammationinpatientswithcrohnsdiseaseaprospectivestudy
AT koichimatsumoto faecalbiomarkersforscreeningsmallbowelinflammationinpatientswithcrohnsdiseaseaprospectivestudy
_version_ 1724538147342123008