Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements

The AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) global network provides estimations of broadband solar radiative fluxes at the surface and at the TOA (Top-Of-the-Atmosphere). This paper reports on the validation of AERONET flux estimations at the TOA with the CERES (Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy Syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michaël Sicard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-09-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2168
id doaj-7d70df39999c46e886921d3197deabb4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d70df39999c46e886921d3197deabb42020-11-24T20:53:57ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-09-011118216810.3390/rs11182168rs11182168Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES MeasurementsMichaël Sicard0CommSensLab, Dept. of Signal Theory and Communications, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08034 Barcelona, SpainThe AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) global network provides estimations of broadband solar radiative fluxes at the surface and at the TOA (Top-Of-the-Atmosphere). This paper reports on the validation of AERONET flux estimations at the TOA with the CERES (Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System) instrument. The validation was made at eight AERONET sites worldwide with at least seven years of Level 2.0 and Version 3 data and representatives of mineral dust, biomass burning, background continental, and urban-industrial aerosol regimes. To co-locate in time and space the AERONET and CERES fluxes, several criteria based on time and distance differences and cloud coverage were defined. When the strictest criterion was applied to all sites, the linear relationship between the observed and estimated fluxes (y = 1.04x – 3.67 Wm<sup>−2</sup>) was very close to the 1:1 ideal line. The correlation coefficient was 0.96 and nearly all points were contained in the ±15% region around the 1:1 line. The average flux difference was –2.52 Wm<sup>−2</sup> (–0.84% in relative terms). AERONET overestimations were observed at two sites and were correlated with large aerosol optical depth (AOD) (&gt;0.2) Underestimations were observed at one desert site and were correlated with large surface albedos (&gt;0.2).https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2168Top-Of-the-Atmosphere (TOA) upward solar fluxesAERONETCERESflux comparison
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michaël Sicard
spellingShingle Michaël Sicard
Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
Remote Sensing
Top-Of-the-Atmosphere (TOA) upward solar fluxes
AERONET
CERES
flux comparison
author_facet Michaël Sicard
author_sort Michaël Sicard
title Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_short Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_full Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_fullStr Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_sort validation of aeronet-estimated upward broadband solar fluxes at the top-of-the-atmosphere with ceres measurements
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2019-09-01
description The AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) global network provides estimations of broadband solar radiative fluxes at the surface and at the TOA (Top-Of-the-Atmosphere). This paper reports on the validation of AERONET flux estimations at the TOA with the CERES (Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System) instrument. The validation was made at eight AERONET sites worldwide with at least seven years of Level 2.0 and Version 3 data and representatives of mineral dust, biomass burning, background continental, and urban-industrial aerosol regimes. To co-locate in time and space the AERONET and CERES fluxes, several criteria based on time and distance differences and cloud coverage were defined. When the strictest criterion was applied to all sites, the linear relationship between the observed and estimated fluxes (y = 1.04x – 3.67 Wm<sup>−2</sup>) was very close to the 1:1 ideal line. The correlation coefficient was 0.96 and nearly all points were contained in the ±15% region around the 1:1 line. The average flux difference was –2.52 Wm<sup>−2</sup> (–0.84% in relative terms). AERONET overestimations were observed at two sites and were correlated with large aerosol optical depth (AOD) (&gt;0.2) Underestimations were observed at one desert site and were correlated with large surface albedos (&gt;0.2).
topic Top-Of-the-Atmosphere (TOA) upward solar fluxes
AERONET
CERES
flux comparison
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2168
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelsicard validationofaeronetestimatedupwardbroadbandsolarfluxesatthetopoftheatmospherewithceresmeasurements
_version_ 1716795627253268480