National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data?

Abstract Background The SWEDish registry of CONgenital heart disease is a Swedish national quality register for collecting data on pediatric and adult (GUCH) patients with congenital heart diseases that aims to improve medical practice and research. The aim of this study was to validate data in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda Bodell, Gudrun Björkhem, Ulf Thilén, Estelle Naumburg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-12-01
Series:Journal of Congenital Cardiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40949-017-0013-7
id doaj-7d5912cada3144fc9028b62921e163fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d5912cada3144fc9028b62921e163fe2020-11-25T01:04:20ZengBMCJournal of Congenital Cardiology2056-72512017-12-01111810.1186/s40949-017-0013-7National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data?Amanda Bodell0Gudrun Björkhem1Ulf Thilén2Estelle Naumburg3Department of Clinical Science, Pediatrics, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University HospitalDepartment of Cardiology, University HospitalDepartment of Clinical Science, Pediatrics, Umeå UniversityAbstract Background The SWEDish registry of CONgenital heart disease is a Swedish national quality register for collecting data on pediatric and adult (GUCH) patients with congenital heart diseases that aims to improve medical practice and research. The aim of this study was to validate data in the register using data in medical records. Methods This cross-sectional observational study compared specific variables from SWEDCON with data retrieved from medical records for 182 pediatric and 186 adult patients who were randomly selected from four different hospitals. Results The absolute concordance for date of visit, diagnosis, information on surgery and catheter intervention was 71–98% between SWEDCON and medical journals. The specificity for cardiac examinations and specific medical therapy was 71–100%. The concordance for information for transition from pediatric care to GUCH or finishing regular check-ups was 92%. Conclusion The overall concordance between data in SWEDCON-pediatric as well as SWEDCON-GUCH with data in medical records was good, and data from SWEDCON is reliable to use for medical improvements and for research purposes.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40949-017-0013-7Congenital heart defectsNational Quality RegisterValidation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amanda Bodell
Gudrun Björkhem
Ulf Thilén
Estelle Naumburg
spellingShingle Amanda Bodell
Gudrun Björkhem
Ulf Thilén
Estelle Naumburg
National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data?
Journal of Congenital Cardiology
Congenital heart defects
National Quality Register
Validation
author_facet Amanda Bodell
Gudrun Björkhem
Ulf Thilén
Estelle Naumburg
author_sort Amanda Bodell
title National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data?
title_short National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data?
title_full National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data?
title_fullStr National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data?
title_full_unstemmed National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data?
title_sort national quality register of congenital heart diseases – can we trust the data?
publisher BMC
series Journal of Congenital Cardiology
issn 2056-7251
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Abstract Background The SWEDish registry of CONgenital heart disease is a Swedish national quality register for collecting data on pediatric and adult (GUCH) patients with congenital heart diseases that aims to improve medical practice and research. The aim of this study was to validate data in the register using data in medical records. Methods This cross-sectional observational study compared specific variables from SWEDCON with data retrieved from medical records for 182 pediatric and 186 adult patients who were randomly selected from four different hospitals. Results The absolute concordance for date of visit, diagnosis, information on surgery and catheter intervention was 71–98% between SWEDCON and medical journals. The specificity for cardiac examinations and specific medical therapy was 71–100%. The concordance for information for transition from pediatric care to GUCH or finishing regular check-ups was 92%. Conclusion The overall concordance between data in SWEDCON-pediatric as well as SWEDCON-GUCH with data in medical records was good, and data from SWEDCON is reliable to use for medical improvements and for research purposes.
topic Congenital heart defects
National Quality Register
Validation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40949-017-0013-7
work_keys_str_mv AT amandabodell nationalqualityregisterofcongenitalheartdiseasescanwetrustthedata
AT gudrunbjorkhem nationalqualityregisterofcongenitalheartdiseasescanwetrustthedata
AT ulfthilen nationalqualityregisterofcongenitalheartdiseasescanwetrustthedata
AT estellenaumburg nationalqualityregisterofcongenitalheartdiseasescanwetrustthedata
_version_ 1725198738098487296