National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data?
Abstract Background The SWEDish registry of CONgenital heart disease is a Swedish national quality register for collecting data on pediatric and adult (GUCH) patients with congenital heart diseases that aims to improve medical practice and research. The aim of this study was to validate data in the...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Congenital Cardiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40949-017-0013-7 |
id |
doaj-7d5912cada3144fc9028b62921e163fe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7d5912cada3144fc9028b62921e163fe2020-11-25T01:04:20ZengBMCJournal of Congenital Cardiology2056-72512017-12-01111810.1186/s40949-017-0013-7National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data?Amanda Bodell0Gudrun Björkhem1Ulf Thilén2Estelle Naumburg3Department of Clinical Science, Pediatrics, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University HospitalDepartment of Cardiology, University HospitalDepartment of Clinical Science, Pediatrics, Umeå UniversityAbstract Background The SWEDish registry of CONgenital heart disease is a Swedish national quality register for collecting data on pediatric and adult (GUCH) patients with congenital heart diseases that aims to improve medical practice and research. The aim of this study was to validate data in the register using data in medical records. Methods This cross-sectional observational study compared specific variables from SWEDCON with data retrieved from medical records for 182 pediatric and 186 adult patients who were randomly selected from four different hospitals. Results The absolute concordance for date of visit, diagnosis, information on surgery and catheter intervention was 71–98% between SWEDCON and medical journals. The specificity for cardiac examinations and specific medical therapy was 71–100%. The concordance for information for transition from pediatric care to GUCH or finishing regular check-ups was 92%. Conclusion The overall concordance between data in SWEDCON-pediatric as well as SWEDCON-GUCH with data in medical records was good, and data from SWEDCON is reliable to use for medical improvements and for research purposes.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40949-017-0013-7Congenital heart defectsNational Quality RegisterValidation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Amanda Bodell Gudrun Björkhem Ulf Thilén Estelle Naumburg |
spellingShingle |
Amanda Bodell Gudrun Björkhem Ulf Thilén Estelle Naumburg National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data? Journal of Congenital Cardiology Congenital heart defects National Quality Register Validation |
author_facet |
Amanda Bodell Gudrun Björkhem Ulf Thilén Estelle Naumburg |
author_sort |
Amanda Bodell |
title |
National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data? |
title_short |
National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data? |
title_full |
National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data? |
title_fullStr |
National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data? |
title_full_unstemmed |
National quality register of congenital heart diseases – Can we trust the data? |
title_sort |
national quality register of congenital heart diseases – can we trust the data? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Journal of Congenital Cardiology |
issn |
2056-7251 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The SWEDish registry of CONgenital heart disease is a Swedish national quality register for collecting data on pediatric and adult (GUCH) patients with congenital heart diseases that aims to improve medical practice and research. The aim of this study was to validate data in the register using data in medical records. Methods This cross-sectional observational study compared specific variables from SWEDCON with data retrieved from medical records for 182 pediatric and 186 adult patients who were randomly selected from four different hospitals. Results The absolute concordance for date of visit, diagnosis, information on surgery and catheter intervention was 71–98% between SWEDCON and medical journals. The specificity for cardiac examinations and specific medical therapy was 71–100%. The concordance for information for transition from pediatric care to GUCH or finishing regular check-ups was 92%. Conclusion The overall concordance between data in SWEDCON-pediatric as well as SWEDCON-GUCH with data in medical records was good, and data from SWEDCON is reliable to use for medical improvements and for research purposes. |
topic |
Congenital heart defects National Quality Register Validation |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40949-017-0013-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amandabodell nationalqualityregisterofcongenitalheartdiseasescanwetrustthedata AT gudrunbjorkhem nationalqualityregisterofcongenitalheartdiseasescanwetrustthedata AT ulfthilen nationalqualityregisterofcongenitalheartdiseasescanwetrustthedata AT estellenaumburg nationalqualityregisterofcongenitalheartdiseasescanwetrustthedata |
_version_ |
1725198738098487296 |