Investigation of visual and physical factors associated with inadequate instillation of eyedrops among patients with glaucoma.

<h4>Purpose</h4>The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of eyedrop instillation failure and its related physical and visual function factors among glaucoma patients who used hypotensive eyedrops daily.<h4>Subjects and methods</h4>Patients with a history of self...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenji Kashiwagi, Yuji Matsuda, Yuka Ito, Hisami Kawate, Masako Sakamoto, Shinji Obi, Hirotaka Haro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251699
id doaj-7d53fe9f3400418c9a621058f9314f65
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d53fe9f3400418c9a621058f9314f652021-05-29T04:31:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01165e025169910.1371/journal.pone.0251699Investigation of visual and physical factors associated with inadequate instillation of eyedrops among patients with glaucoma.Kenji KashiwagiYuji MatsudaYuka ItoHisami KawateMasako SakamotoShinji ObiHirotaka Haro<h4>Purpose</h4>The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of eyedrop instillation failure and its related physical and visual function factors among glaucoma patients who used hypotensive eyedrops daily.<h4>Subjects and methods</h4>Patients with a history of self-instillation of one or more ocular hypotensive ophthalmic solutions for six or more months were enrolled. Definitions of instillation failure were eyedrop instillation other than on the eye surface; eyedrop contact with eyelashes; eyedrop bottle tip contact with the eyelashes, eye surface or ocular adnexa; or two or more drops instilled with one instillation trial. To clarify factors related to instillation failure, we used visual function tests and investigated cervical spine extension angles during instillation, pinching strength, physical ataxia (evaluated using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia), motor dysfunction of the upper limbs (evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire), and vision quality (evaluated using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25).<h4>Results</h4>Of 103 total subjects, 61.2% satisfied the definition of instillation failure. Instillation of the eyedrop other than at the cul-desac (76.2%) was the most frequent reason for failure, followed by contact of the tip of the eyedrop bottle (22.2%) and instillation of the same or more than two eyedrops in a single attempt (11.1%). Advanced age, a shallow cervical spine extension angle, weak pinching strength, poor motor dysfunction of the upper limbs, the degree of ataxia, poor best-corrected visual acuity, and visual field scores were significant risk factors for instillation failure. Vision quality may have some relation to instillation failure.<h4>Conclusion</h4>It is highly recommended that instillation failure be routinely investigated even among patients with adequate experience using eyedrops and that correct therapies are chosen in a patient-based fashion.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251699
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kenji Kashiwagi
Yuji Matsuda
Yuka Ito
Hisami Kawate
Masako Sakamoto
Shinji Obi
Hirotaka Haro
spellingShingle Kenji Kashiwagi
Yuji Matsuda
Yuka Ito
Hisami Kawate
Masako Sakamoto
Shinji Obi
Hirotaka Haro
Investigation of visual and physical factors associated with inadequate instillation of eyedrops among patients with glaucoma.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kenji Kashiwagi
Yuji Matsuda
Yuka Ito
Hisami Kawate
Masako Sakamoto
Shinji Obi
Hirotaka Haro
author_sort Kenji Kashiwagi
title Investigation of visual and physical factors associated with inadequate instillation of eyedrops among patients with glaucoma.
title_short Investigation of visual and physical factors associated with inadequate instillation of eyedrops among patients with glaucoma.
title_full Investigation of visual and physical factors associated with inadequate instillation of eyedrops among patients with glaucoma.
title_fullStr Investigation of visual and physical factors associated with inadequate instillation of eyedrops among patients with glaucoma.
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of visual and physical factors associated with inadequate instillation of eyedrops among patients with glaucoma.
title_sort investigation of visual and physical factors associated with inadequate instillation of eyedrops among patients with glaucoma.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <h4>Purpose</h4>The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of eyedrop instillation failure and its related physical and visual function factors among glaucoma patients who used hypotensive eyedrops daily.<h4>Subjects and methods</h4>Patients with a history of self-instillation of one or more ocular hypotensive ophthalmic solutions for six or more months were enrolled. Definitions of instillation failure were eyedrop instillation other than on the eye surface; eyedrop contact with eyelashes; eyedrop bottle tip contact with the eyelashes, eye surface or ocular adnexa; or two or more drops instilled with one instillation trial. To clarify factors related to instillation failure, we used visual function tests and investigated cervical spine extension angles during instillation, pinching strength, physical ataxia (evaluated using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia), motor dysfunction of the upper limbs (evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire), and vision quality (evaluated using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25).<h4>Results</h4>Of 103 total subjects, 61.2% satisfied the definition of instillation failure. Instillation of the eyedrop other than at the cul-desac (76.2%) was the most frequent reason for failure, followed by contact of the tip of the eyedrop bottle (22.2%) and instillation of the same or more than two eyedrops in a single attempt (11.1%). Advanced age, a shallow cervical spine extension angle, weak pinching strength, poor motor dysfunction of the upper limbs, the degree of ataxia, poor best-corrected visual acuity, and visual field scores were significant risk factors for instillation failure. Vision quality may have some relation to instillation failure.<h4>Conclusion</h4>It is highly recommended that instillation failure be routinely investigated even among patients with adequate experience using eyedrops and that correct therapies are chosen in a patient-based fashion.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251699
work_keys_str_mv AT kenjikashiwagi investigationofvisualandphysicalfactorsassociatedwithinadequateinstillationofeyedropsamongpatientswithglaucoma
AT yujimatsuda investigationofvisualandphysicalfactorsassociatedwithinadequateinstillationofeyedropsamongpatientswithglaucoma
AT yukaito investigationofvisualandphysicalfactorsassociatedwithinadequateinstillationofeyedropsamongpatientswithglaucoma
AT hisamikawate investigationofvisualandphysicalfactorsassociatedwithinadequateinstillationofeyedropsamongpatientswithglaucoma
AT masakosakamoto investigationofvisualandphysicalfactorsassociatedwithinadequateinstillationofeyedropsamongpatientswithglaucoma
AT shinjiobi investigationofvisualandphysicalfactorsassociatedwithinadequateinstillationofeyedropsamongpatientswithglaucoma
AT hirotakaharo investigationofvisualandphysicalfactorsassociatedwithinadequateinstillationofeyedropsamongpatientswithglaucoma
_version_ 1721422798421753856