Criterion scores, construct validity and reliability of a web-based instrument to assess physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning focused on behaviour change: ‘Reasoning 4 Change’
<em>Background and aim:</em> ‘Reasoning 4 Change’ (R4C) is a newly developed instrument, including four domains (D1–D4), to assess clinical practitioners’ and students’ clinical reasoning with a focus on clients’ behaviour change in a physiotherapy context. To establish its use in educat...
Main Authors: | Maria Elvén, Jacek Hochwälder, Elizabeth Dean, Olle Hällman, Anne Söderlund |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AIMS Press
2018-07-01
|
Series: | AIMS Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/publichealth.2018.3.235/fulltext.html |
Similar Items
-
TEACHING CLINICAL REASONING TO PHYSIOTHERAPISTS IN SAUDI ARABIA: A THEORETICAL REPORT
by: Mansour Abdullah Alshehri
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Psychometric properties of a clinical reasoning assessment rubric for nursing education
by: JuHee Lee, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Structural validity and reliability of the healthcare professionals' economic reasoning questionnaire
by: Vuković Mira H., et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test: A Study of Validity and Reliability
by: Mehmet Emrah Karadere, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Essentials for sustainable physiotherapy: Introducing environmental reasoning into physiotherapy clinical decision-making
by: Filip Maric, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)