When size makes a difference: allometry, life-history and morphological evolution of capuchins (<it>Cebus</it>) and squirrels (<it>Saimiri</it>) monkeys (Cebinae, Platyrrhini)

• Main Author: Marroig Gabriel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2007-02-01
• Series: BMC Evolutionary Biology
• Online Access: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/20

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>How are morphological evolution and developmental changes related? This rather old and intriguing question had a substantial boost after the 70s within the framework of heterochrony (changes in rates or timing of development) and nowadays has the potential to make another major leap forward through the combination of approaches: molecular biology, developmental experimentation, comparative systematic studies, geometric morphometrics and quantitative genetics. Here I take an integrated approach combining life-history comparative analyses, classical and geometric morphometrics applied to ontogenetic series to understand changes in size and shape which happen during the evolution of two New World Monkeys (NWM) sister genera.</p> <p>Results</p> <p><it>Cebus </it>and <it>Saimiri </it>share the same basic allometric patterns in skull traits, a result robust to sexual and ontogenetic variation. If adults of both genera are compared in the same scale (discounting size differences) most differences are small and not statistically significant. These results are consistent using both approaches, classical and geometric Morphometrics. <it>Cebus </it>is a genus characterized by a number of peramorphic traits (adult-like) while <it>Saimiri </it>is a genus with paedomorphic (child like) traits. Yet, the whole clade Cebinae is characterized by a unique combination of very high pre-natal growth rates and relatively slow post-natal growth rates when compared to the rest of the NWM. Morphologically Cebinae can be considered paedomorphic in relation to the other NWM. Geometric morphometrics allows the precise separation of absolute size, shape variation associated with size (allometry), and shape variation non-associated with size. Interestingly, and despite the fact that they were extracted as independent factors (principal components), evolutionary allometry (those differences in allometric shape associated with intergeneric differences) and ontogenetic allometry (differences in allometric shape associated with ontogenetic variation within genus) are correlated within these two genera. Furthermore, morphological differences produced along these two axes are quite similar. <it>Cebus </it>and <it>Saimiri </it>are aligned along the same evolutionary allometry and have parallel ontogenetic allometry trajectories.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The evolution of these two Platyrrhini monkeys is basically due to a size differentiation (and consequently to shape changes associated with size). Many life-history changes are correlated or may be the causal agents in such evolution, such as delayed on-set of reproduction in <it>Cebus </it>and larger neonates in <it>Saimiri</it>.</p>