Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration

Abstract Background Different methods of cranioplasty for the reconstruction of bony skull defects exist. In the absence of the autologous bone flap, a customised manufactured implant may be the optimal choice, but this implant has several limitations regarding its technical standardisation and bett...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erasmo Barros da Silva Júnior, Afonso Henrique de Aragão, Marcelo de Paula Loureiro, Caetano Silva Lobo, Ana Flávia Oliveti, Rafael Martinelli de Oliveira, Ricardo Ramina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-02-01
Series:3D Printing in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00096-7
id doaj-7d40a1742ada4cf7aa0c600aeac8679f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d40a1742ada4cf7aa0c600aeac8679f2021-02-07T12:24:11ZengBMC3D Printing in Medicine2365-62712021-02-017111110.1186/s41205-021-00096-7Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness considerationErasmo Barros da Silva Júnior0Afonso Henrique de Aragão1Marcelo de Paula Loureiro2Caetano Silva Lobo3Ana Flávia Oliveti4Rafael Martinelli de Oliveira5Ricardo Ramina6Department of Neurosurgery, Instituto de Neurologia de CuritibaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Instituto de Neurologia de CuritibaPost-Graduation Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Universidade PositivoBMR MedicalBMR MedicalBMR MedicalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Instituto de Neurologia de CuritibaAbstract Background Different methods of cranioplasty for the reconstruction of bony skull defects exist. In the absence of the autologous bone flap, a customised manufactured implant may be the optimal choice, but this implant has several limitations regarding its technical standardisation and better cost-effectiveness. Methods This study presents a series of 16 consecutive patients who had undergone cranioplasty with customised three-dimensional (3D) template moulds for polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implants manufactured after 3D modelling on a specific workstation. The virtual images were transformed into a two-piece physical model using a 3D printer for the biomaterials. PMMA implant was produced intraoperatively with the custom mould. Cosmetic results were analysed by comparing pre- and postoperative 3D computed tomography (CT) images and asking if the patient was satisfied with the result. Results The average total time for planning and production of customised mould was 10 days. The 16 patients were satisfied with the result, and CT images presented harmonious symmetry when comparing pre- and postoperative scans. Cases of postoperative infection, bleeding, or reoperation in this series were not observed. Conclusion Cranioplasty with high-technology customised 3D moulds for PMMA implants can allow for an aesthetic reconstruction with a fast and cost-effective manufacturing process and possibly with low complication rates.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00096-73D printingCranioplastyCustomised implantPolymethylmethacrylateReconstructive surgeryThree-dimensional template
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erasmo Barros da Silva Júnior
Afonso Henrique de Aragão
Marcelo de Paula Loureiro
Caetano Silva Lobo
Ana Flávia Oliveti
Rafael Martinelli de Oliveira
Ricardo Ramina
spellingShingle Erasmo Barros da Silva Júnior
Afonso Henrique de Aragão
Marcelo de Paula Loureiro
Caetano Silva Lobo
Ana Flávia Oliveti
Rafael Martinelli de Oliveira
Ricardo Ramina
Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
3D Printing in Medicine
3D printing
Cranioplasty
Customised implant
Polymethylmethacrylate
Reconstructive surgery
Three-dimensional template
author_facet Erasmo Barros da Silva Júnior
Afonso Henrique de Aragão
Marcelo de Paula Loureiro
Caetano Silva Lobo
Ana Flávia Oliveti
Rafael Martinelli de Oliveira
Ricardo Ramina
author_sort Erasmo Barros da Silva Júnior
title Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
title_short Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
title_full Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
title_fullStr Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
title_full_unstemmed Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
title_sort cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration
publisher BMC
series 3D Printing in Medicine
issn 2365-6271
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Background Different methods of cranioplasty for the reconstruction of bony skull defects exist. In the absence of the autologous bone flap, a customised manufactured implant may be the optimal choice, but this implant has several limitations regarding its technical standardisation and better cost-effectiveness. Methods This study presents a series of 16 consecutive patients who had undergone cranioplasty with customised three-dimensional (3D) template moulds for polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implants manufactured after 3D modelling on a specific workstation. The virtual images were transformed into a two-piece physical model using a 3D printer for the biomaterials. PMMA implant was produced intraoperatively with the custom mould. Cosmetic results were analysed by comparing pre- and postoperative 3D computed tomography (CT) images and asking if the patient was satisfied with the result. Results The average total time for planning and production of customised mould was 10 days. The 16 patients were satisfied with the result, and CT images presented harmonious symmetry when comparing pre- and postoperative scans. Cases of postoperative infection, bleeding, or reoperation in this series were not observed. Conclusion Cranioplasty with high-technology customised 3D moulds for PMMA implants can allow for an aesthetic reconstruction with a fast and cost-effective manufacturing process and possibly with low complication rates.
topic 3D printing
Cranioplasty
Customised implant
Polymethylmethacrylate
Reconstructive surgery
Three-dimensional template
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00096-7
work_keys_str_mv AT erasmobarrosdasilvajunior cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
AT afonsohenriquedearagao cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
AT marcelodepaulaloureiro cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
AT caetanosilvalobo cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
AT anaflaviaoliveti cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
AT rafaelmartinellideoliveira cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
AT ricardoramina cranioplastywiththreedimensionalcustomisedmouldforpolymethylmethacrylateimplantaseriesof16consecutivepatientswithcosteffectivenessconsideration
_version_ 1724281229217366016