Backward- and forward-looking potential of anaphors

Personal pronouns and demonstratives contribute differently to the encoding of information in the mental model and they serve distinct backward- and forward-looking functions. While (unstressed) personal pronouns are the default means to indicate coreference with the most prominent discourse entity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petra B. Schumacher, Jana eBackhaus, Manuel eDangl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
ERP
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01746/full
id doaj-7d2b73173afb4d17bddcb9a6ada42033
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d2b73173afb4d17bddcb9a6ada420332020-11-24T20:52:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-11-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.01746165055Backward- and forward-looking potential of anaphorsPetra B. Schumacher0Jana eBackhaus1Manuel eDangl2University of CologneUniversity of CologneUniversity of ColognePersonal pronouns and demonstratives contribute differently to the encoding of information in the mental model and they serve distinct backward- and forward-looking functions. While (unstressed) personal pronouns are the default means to indicate coreference with the most prominent discourse entity (backward-looking function) and typically mark the maintenance of the current topic, demonstratives are used to refer to a less prominent entity and serve the additional forward-looking function of signaling a possible topic shift. In Experiment 1, we present an ERP study that examines the time course of processing personal and d-pronouns in German (er vs. der) and assesses the impact of two prominence features of the antecedent, thematic role and sentential position, as well as neurophysiological correlates of backward- and forward-looking functions of referential expressions. We tested the comprehension of personal and d-pronouns following context sentences containing two potential antecedents. In addition to the factor pronoun type (er vs. der), we varied the verb type (active accusative verbs vs. dative experiencer verbs) and the thematic role order (canonical vs. non-canonical) in the context sentences to vary the antecedent’s prominence. Time-locked to pronoun-onset, the ERPs revealed a general biphasic N400-Late Positivity for d-pronouns over personal pronouns with further subtle interactions of the prominence-lending cues in the early time window. The findings indicate that the calculation of the referential candidates’ prominence (backward-looking function) is guided by thematic role and positional information. Thematic role information, in combination with initial position, thus represents a central predictor during referential processing. Coreference with a less prominent entity (assumed for d-pronouns) results in processing costs (N400). The additional topic shift signaled by d-pronouns (forward-looking function) results in attentional reorienting (Late Positivity). This is further supported by Experiment 2, a story continuation study, which showed that personal pronouns trigger topic maintenance, while d-pronouns yield topic shifts.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01746/fullERPN400PositionprominenceLate Positivitypronoun resolution
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Petra B. Schumacher
Jana eBackhaus
Manuel eDangl
spellingShingle Petra B. Schumacher
Jana eBackhaus
Manuel eDangl
Backward- and forward-looking potential of anaphors
Frontiers in Psychology
ERP
N400
Position
prominence
Late Positivity
pronoun resolution
author_facet Petra B. Schumacher
Jana eBackhaus
Manuel eDangl
author_sort Petra B. Schumacher
title Backward- and forward-looking potential of anaphors
title_short Backward- and forward-looking potential of anaphors
title_full Backward- and forward-looking potential of anaphors
title_fullStr Backward- and forward-looking potential of anaphors
title_full_unstemmed Backward- and forward-looking potential of anaphors
title_sort backward- and forward-looking potential of anaphors
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-11-01
description Personal pronouns and demonstratives contribute differently to the encoding of information in the mental model and they serve distinct backward- and forward-looking functions. While (unstressed) personal pronouns are the default means to indicate coreference with the most prominent discourse entity (backward-looking function) and typically mark the maintenance of the current topic, demonstratives are used to refer to a less prominent entity and serve the additional forward-looking function of signaling a possible topic shift. In Experiment 1, we present an ERP study that examines the time course of processing personal and d-pronouns in German (er vs. der) and assesses the impact of two prominence features of the antecedent, thematic role and sentential position, as well as neurophysiological correlates of backward- and forward-looking functions of referential expressions. We tested the comprehension of personal and d-pronouns following context sentences containing two potential antecedents. In addition to the factor pronoun type (er vs. der), we varied the verb type (active accusative verbs vs. dative experiencer verbs) and the thematic role order (canonical vs. non-canonical) in the context sentences to vary the antecedent’s prominence. Time-locked to pronoun-onset, the ERPs revealed a general biphasic N400-Late Positivity for d-pronouns over personal pronouns with further subtle interactions of the prominence-lending cues in the early time window. The findings indicate that the calculation of the referential candidates’ prominence (backward-looking function) is guided by thematic role and positional information. Thematic role information, in combination with initial position, thus represents a central predictor during referential processing. Coreference with a less prominent entity (assumed for d-pronouns) results in processing costs (N400). The additional topic shift signaled by d-pronouns (forward-looking function) results in attentional reorienting (Late Positivity). This is further supported by Experiment 2, a story continuation study, which showed that personal pronouns trigger topic maintenance, while d-pronouns yield topic shifts.
topic ERP
N400
Position
prominence
Late Positivity
pronoun resolution
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01746/full
work_keys_str_mv AT petrabschumacher backwardandforwardlookingpotentialofanaphors
AT janaebackhaus backwardandforwardlookingpotentialofanaphors
AT manueledangl backwardandforwardlookingpotentialofanaphors
_version_ 1716798961115725824