Substrate selection for fundamental studies of electrocatalysts and photoelectrodes: inert potential windows in acidic, neutral, and basic electrolyte.
The selection of an appropriate substrate is an important initial step for many studies of electrochemically active materials. In order to help researchers with the substrate selection process, we employ a consistent experimental methodology to evaluate the electrochemical reactivity and stability o...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4214636?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-7d2a93fb641d482590881120cf82b989 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7d2a93fb641d482590881120cf82b9892020-11-25T02:06:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01910e10794210.1371/journal.pone.0107942Substrate selection for fundamental studies of electrocatalysts and photoelectrodes: inert potential windows in acidic, neutral, and basic electrolyte.Jesse D BenckBlaise A PinaudYelena GorlinThomas F JaramilloThe selection of an appropriate substrate is an important initial step for many studies of electrochemically active materials. In order to help researchers with the substrate selection process, we employ a consistent experimental methodology to evaluate the electrochemical reactivity and stability of seven potential substrate materials for electrocatalyst and photoelectrode evaluation. Using cyclic voltammetry with a progressively increased scan range, we characterize three transparent conducting oxides (indium tin oxide, fluorine-doped tin oxide, and aluminum-doped zinc oxide) and four opaque conductors (gold, stainless steel 304, glassy carbon, and highly oriented pyrolytic graphite) in three different electrolytes (sulfuric acid, sodium acetate, and sodium hydroxide). We determine the inert potential window for each substrate/electrolyte combination and make recommendations about which materials may be most suitable for application under different experimental conditions. Furthermore, the testing methodology provides a framework for other researchers to evaluate and report the baseline activity of other substrates of interest to the broader community.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4214636?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jesse D Benck Blaise A Pinaud Yelena Gorlin Thomas F Jaramillo |
spellingShingle |
Jesse D Benck Blaise A Pinaud Yelena Gorlin Thomas F Jaramillo Substrate selection for fundamental studies of electrocatalysts and photoelectrodes: inert potential windows in acidic, neutral, and basic electrolyte. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Jesse D Benck Blaise A Pinaud Yelena Gorlin Thomas F Jaramillo |
author_sort |
Jesse D Benck |
title |
Substrate selection for fundamental studies of electrocatalysts and photoelectrodes: inert potential windows in acidic, neutral, and basic electrolyte. |
title_short |
Substrate selection for fundamental studies of electrocatalysts and photoelectrodes: inert potential windows in acidic, neutral, and basic electrolyte. |
title_full |
Substrate selection for fundamental studies of electrocatalysts and photoelectrodes: inert potential windows in acidic, neutral, and basic electrolyte. |
title_fullStr |
Substrate selection for fundamental studies of electrocatalysts and photoelectrodes: inert potential windows in acidic, neutral, and basic electrolyte. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Substrate selection for fundamental studies of electrocatalysts and photoelectrodes: inert potential windows in acidic, neutral, and basic electrolyte. |
title_sort |
substrate selection for fundamental studies of electrocatalysts and photoelectrodes: inert potential windows in acidic, neutral, and basic electrolyte. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
The selection of an appropriate substrate is an important initial step for many studies of electrochemically active materials. In order to help researchers with the substrate selection process, we employ a consistent experimental methodology to evaluate the electrochemical reactivity and stability of seven potential substrate materials for electrocatalyst and photoelectrode evaluation. Using cyclic voltammetry with a progressively increased scan range, we characterize three transparent conducting oxides (indium tin oxide, fluorine-doped tin oxide, and aluminum-doped zinc oxide) and four opaque conductors (gold, stainless steel 304, glassy carbon, and highly oriented pyrolytic graphite) in three different electrolytes (sulfuric acid, sodium acetate, and sodium hydroxide). We determine the inert potential window for each substrate/electrolyte combination and make recommendations about which materials may be most suitable for application under different experimental conditions. Furthermore, the testing methodology provides a framework for other researchers to evaluate and report the baseline activity of other substrates of interest to the broader community. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4214636?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jessedbenck substrateselectionforfundamentalstudiesofelectrocatalystsandphotoelectrodesinertpotentialwindowsinacidicneutralandbasicelectrolyte AT blaiseapinaud substrateselectionforfundamentalstudiesofelectrocatalystsandphotoelectrodesinertpotentialwindowsinacidicneutralandbasicelectrolyte AT yelenagorlin substrateselectionforfundamentalstudiesofelectrocatalystsandphotoelectrodesinertpotentialwindowsinacidicneutralandbasicelectrolyte AT thomasfjaramillo substrateselectionforfundamentalstudiesofelectrocatalystsandphotoelectrodesinertpotentialwindowsinacidicneutralandbasicelectrolyte |
_version_ |
1724934041583484928 |