Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means
Analysis is made of the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hourly means constructed from definitive minute data having missing values (gaps). Bootstrap sampling from different data-gap distributions is used to estimate average errors on hourly means as a function of the number of missing data. Abs...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2009-09-01
|
Series: | Annales Geophysicae |
Online Access: | https://www.ann-geophys.net/27/3601/2009/angeo-27-3601-2009.pdf |
id |
doaj-7d257c85dc8d49018d10d07c7545bec3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7d257c85dc8d49018d10d07c7545bec32020-11-24T23:28:18ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762009-09-01273601361010.5194/angeo-27-3601-2009Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour meansJ. J. Love0Geomagnetism Program, US Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USAAnalysis is made of the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hourly means constructed from definitive minute data having missing values (gaps). Bootstrap sampling from different data-gap distributions is used to estimate average errors on hourly means as a function of the number of missing data. Absolute and relative error results are calculated for horizontal-intensity, declination, and vertical-component data collected at high, medium, and low magnetic latitudes. For 90% complete coverage (10% missing data), average (RMS) absolute errors on hourly means are generally less than errors permitted by Intermagnet for minute data. As a rule of thumb, the average relative error for hourly means with 10% missing minute data is approximately equal to 10% of the hourly standard deviation of the source minute data.https://www.ann-geophys.net/27/3601/2009/angeo-27-3601-2009.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J. J. Love |
spellingShingle |
J. J. Love Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means Annales Geophysicae |
author_facet |
J. J. Love |
author_sort |
J. J. Love |
title |
Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means |
title_short |
Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means |
title_full |
Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means |
title_fullStr |
Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means |
title_full_unstemmed |
Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means |
title_sort |
missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Annales Geophysicae |
issn |
0992-7689 1432-0576 |
publishDate |
2009-09-01 |
description |
Analysis is made of the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hourly means
constructed from definitive minute data having missing values (gaps).
Bootstrap sampling from different data-gap distributions is used to estimate
average errors on hourly means as a function of the number of missing data.
Absolute and relative error results are calculated for horizontal-intensity,
declination, and vertical-component data collected at high, medium, and low
magnetic latitudes. For 90% complete coverage (10% missing data), average
(RMS) absolute errors on hourly means are generally less than errors
permitted by Intermagnet for minute data. As a rule of thumb, the average
relative error for hourly means with 10% missing minute data is
approximately equal to 10% of the hourly standard deviation of the source
minute data. |
url |
https://www.ann-geophys.net/27/3601/2009/angeo-27-3601-2009.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jjlove missingdataandtheaccuracyofmagneticobservatoryhourmeans |
_version_ |
1725549875905429504 |