Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means

Analysis is made of the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hourly means constructed from definitive minute data having missing values (gaps). Bootstrap sampling from different data-gap distributions is used to estimate average errors on hourly means as a function of the number of missing data. Abs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: J. J. Love
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2009-09-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/27/3601/2009/angeo-27-3601-2009.pdf
id doaj-7d257c85dc8d49018d10d07c7545bec3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d257c85dc8d49018d10d07c7545bec32020-11-24T23:28:18ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762009-09-01273601361010.5194/angeo-27-3601-2009Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour meansJ. J. Love0Geomagnetism Program, US Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USAAnalysis is made of the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hourly means constructed from definitive minute data having missing values (gaps). Bootstrap sampling from different data-gap distributions is used to estimate average errors on hourly means as a function of the number of missing data. Absolute and relative error results are calculated for horizontal-intensity, declination, and vertical-component data collected at high, medium, and low magnetic latitudes. For 90% complete coverage (10% missing data), average (RMS) absolute errors on hourly means are generally less than errors permitted by Intermagnet for minute data. As a rule of thumb, the average relative error for hourly means with 10% missing minute data is approximately equal to 10% of the hourly standard deviation of the source minute data.https://www.ann-geophys.net/27/3601/2009/angeo-27-3601-2009.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. J. Love
spellingShingle J. J. Love
Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means
Annales Geophysicae
author_facet J. J. Love
author_sort J. J. Love
title Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means
title_short Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means
title_full Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means
title_fullStr Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means
title_full_unstemmed Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means
title_sort missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Annales Geophysicae
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
publishDate 2009-09-01
description Analysis is made of the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hourly means constructed from definitive minute data having missing values (gaps). Bootstrap sampling from different data-gap distributions is used to estimate average errors on hourly means as a function of the number of missing data. Absolute and relative error results are calculated for horizontal-intensity, declination, and vertical-component data collected at high, medium, and low magnetic latitudes. For 90% complete coverage (10% missing data), average (RMS) absolute errors on hourly means are generally less than errors permitted by Intermagnet for minute data. As a rule of thumb, the average relative error for hourly means with 10% missing minute data is approximately equal to 10% of the hourly standard deviation of the source minute data.
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/27/3601/2009/angeo-27-3601-2009.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jjlove missingdataandtheaccuracyofmagneticobservatoryhourmeans
_version_ 1725549875905429504