Phonological Evidences Which Separate and Unite Mamboro Language from Proto Wanokaka-Anakalang in Sumba Group of Languages

This article describes the separating and uniting phonological evidences of Proto Wanokaka-Anakalang (PWn-An) and Mamboro language (Mb) reflected from the phonological changes of the Proto Mamboro-Wanokaka-Anakalang (PMb-Wn-An) phonemes. The description is based on the types of phonological changes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Budasi I. G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Petra Christian University 2012-01-01
Series:K@ta: A Biannual Publication on the Study of Language and Literature
Subjects:
Online Access:http://puslit2.petra.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/ing/article/view/18655
id doaj-7d098f19a44848b297b482ce2c1693e8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7d098f19a44848b297b482ce2c1693e82020-11-25T02:16:55ZengPetra Christian UniversityK@ta: A Biannual Publication on the Study of Language and Literature1411-26392012-01-011426568Phonological Evidences Which Separate and Unite Mamboro Language from Proto Wanokaka-Anakalang in Sumba Group of LanguagesBudasi I. G.This article describes the separating and uniting phonological evidences of Proto Wanokaka-Anakalang (PWn-An) and Mamboro language (Mb) reflected from the phonological changes of the Proto Mamboro-Wanokaka-Anakalang (PMb-Wn-An) phonemes. The description is based on the types of phonological changes suggested by Jeffers and Lehiste (1979). This article shows that the three phonemes of PMb-Wn-An were found ‘retention’ in PWn-An, but underwent ‘split’ in Mb and one phoneme underwent ‘monophthongization’. One phoneme of PMb-Wn-An underwent ‘substitution’, in PWn-An, but ‘retention’ in Mb. One phoneme of PMb-Wn-An was found ‘split’ in PWn-An, but ‘retention’ in Mb. Whereas, the uniting evidences show that three PMb-Wn-An phonemes were found ‘retention’ both in PWn-An and Mb. One phoneme of PMb-Wn-An underwent ‘split’ both in PWn-An as well as in Mb. http://puslit2.petra.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/ing/article/view/18655Retentionsplitmonophthongizationsubstitutionretentiontypes of phonological changes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Budasi I. G.
spellingShingle Budasi I. G.
Phonological Evidences Which Separate and Unite Mamboro Language from Proto Wanokaka-Anakalang in Sumba Group of Languages
K@ta: A Biannual Publication on the Study of Language and Literature
Retention
split
monophthongization
substitution
retention
types of phonological changes
author_facet Budasi I. G.
author_sort Budasi I. G.
title Phonological Evidences Which Separate and Unite Mamboro Language from Proto Wanokaka-Anakalang in Sumba Group of Languages
title_short Phonological Evidences Which Separate and Unite Mamboro Language from Proto Wanokaka-Anakalang in Sumba Group of Languages
title_full Phonological Evidences Which Separate and Unite Mamboro Language from Proto Wanokaka-Anakalang in Sumba Group of Languages
title_fullStr Phonological Evidences Which Separate and Unite Mamboro Language from Proto Wanokaka-Anakalang in Sumba Group of Languages
title_full_unstemmed Phonological Evidences Which Separate and Unite Mamboro Language from Proto Wanokaka-Anakalang in Sumba Group of Languages
title_sort phonological evidences which separate and unite mamboro language from proto wanokaka-anakalang in sumba group of languages
publisher Petra Christian University
series K@ta: A Biannual Publication on the Study of Language and Literature
issn 1411-2639
publishDate 2012-01-01
description This article describes the separating and uniting phonological evidences of Proto Wanokaka-Anakalang (PWn-An) and Mamboro language (Mb) reflected from the phonological changes of the Proto Mamboro-Wanokaka-Anakalang (PMb-Wn-An) phonemes. The description is based on the types of phonological changes suggested by Jeffers and Lehiste (1979). This article shows that the three phonemes of PMb-Wn-An were found ‘retention’ in PWn-An, but underwent ‘split’ in Mb and one phoneme underwent ‘monophthongization’. One phoneme of PMb-Wn-An underwent ‘substitution’, in PWn-An, but ‘retention’ in Mb. One phoneme of PMb-Wn-An was found ‘split’ in PWn-An, but ‘retention’ in Mb. Whereas, the uniting evidences show that three PMb-Wn-An phonemes were found ‘retention’ both in PWn-An and Mb. One phoneme of PMb-Wn-An underwent ‘split’ both in PWn-An as well as in Mb.
topic Retention
split
monophthongization
substitution
retention
types of phonological changes
url http://puslit2.petra.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/ing/article/view/18655
work_keys_str_mv AT budasiig phonologicalevidenceswhichseparateandunitemamborolanguagefromprotowanokakaanakalanginsumbagroupoflanguages
_version_ 1724888224229228544