Attachment Styles and Communication of Displeasing Truths

This work explores how humans manage the communication of a displeasing and face-threatening truth and how the communicative strategies of the sender and the reaction of the receiver are influenced by their attachment style. Two experimental studies demonstrate that the attachment styles of both sen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isora Sessa, Francesca D’Errico, Isabella Poggi, Giovanna Leone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01065/full
id doaj-7cfc4558433945848d9f2f3e2d63ee9e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7cfc4558433945848d9f2f3e2d63ee9e2020-11-25T03:15:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-06-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.01065525930Attachment Styles and Communication of Displeasing TruthsIsora Sessa0Francesca D’Errico1Isabella Poggi2Giovanna Leone3Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, ItalyFil.Co.Spe. Department, Roma Tre University, Rome, ItalyFil.Co.Spe. Department, Roma Tre University, Rome, ItalyCoris. Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, ItalyThis work explores how humans manage the communication of a displeasing and face-threatening truth and how the communicative strategies of the sender and the reaction of the receiver are influenced by their attachment style. Two experimental studies demonstrate that the attachment styles of both senders and receivers can influence the communicative styles of the sender, the emotions that both senders and receivers feel or attribute to their interlocutor, and the reactions of the receivers. In Study 1, couples of participants played a bogus computer game, ostensibly to test their abilities. Subsequently, “the spokesperson” was given the task to communicate to the “the receiver” a bogus low score of the other and a high score of oneself. Finally, all participants completed an adult Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ). A content analysis of the verbal messages of the spokespersons showed two main communication styles: frankness and mitigation. The results suggest that the spokespersons’ attachment style influences these communication styles. Using a similar procedure, Study 2 showed that spokespersons with a high avoidant attachment more frequently used frankness when communicating low scores to the receivers. Furthermore, the emotions and impressions reported by anxious and avoidant spokespersons and receivers, respectively, confirm the negative model of the self or the other, typical, respectively, in anxious and avoidant attachment. The detection of communicative strategies stemming from different attachment styles might be of use in user modeling and the planning of personalized systems.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01065/fullattachment stylestruthful communicationdispleasing truthfranknessmitigationpoliteness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Isora Sessa
Francesca D’Errico
Isabella Poggi
Giovanna Leone
spellingShingle Isora Sessa
Francesca D’Errico
Isabella Poggi
Giovanna Leone
Attachment Styles and Communication of Displeasing Truths
Frontiers in Psychology
attachment styles
truthful communication
displeasing truth
frankness
mitigation
politeness
author_facet Isora Sessa
Francesca D’Errico
Isabella Poggi
Giovanna Leone
author_sort Isora Sessa
title Attachment Styles and Communication of Displeasing Truths
title_short Attachment Styles and Communication of Displeasing Truths
title_full Attachment Styles and Communication of Displeasing Truths
title_fullStr Attachment Styles and Communication of Displeasing Truths
title_full_unstemmed Attachment Styles and Communication of Displeasing Truths
title_sort attachment styles and communication of displeasing truths
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-06-01
description This work explores how humans manage the communication of a displeasing and face-threatening truth and how the communicative strategies of the sender and the reaction of the receiver are influenced by their attachment style. Two experimental studies demonstrate that the attachment styles of both senders and receivers can influence the communicative styles of the sender, the emotions that both senders and receivers feel or attribute to their interlocutor, and the reactions of the receivers. In Study 1, couples of participants played a bogus computer game, ostensibly to test their abilities. Subsequently, “the spokesperson” was given the task to communicate to the “the receiver” a bogus low score of the other and a high score of oneself. Finally, all participants completed an adult Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ). A content analysis of the verbal messages of the spokespersons showed two main communication styles: frankness and mitigation. The results suggest that the spokespersons’ attachment style influences these communication styles. Using a similar procedure, Study 2 showed that spokespersons with a high avoidant attachment more frequently used frankness when communicating low scores to the receivers. Furthermore, the emotions and impressions reported by anxious and avoidant spokespersons and receivers, respectively, confirm the negative model of the self or the other, typical, respectively, in anxious and avoidant attachment. The detection of communicative strategies stemming from different attachment styles might be of use in user modeling and the planning of personalized systems.
topic attachment styles
truthful communication
displeasing truth
frankness
mitigation
politeness
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01065/full
work_keys_str_mv AT isorasessa attachmentstylesandcommunicationofdispleasingtruths
AT francescaderrico attachmentstylesandcommunicationofdispleasingtruths
AT isabellapoggi attachmentstylesandcommunicationofdispleasingtruths
AT giovannaleone attachmentstylesandcommunicationofdispleasingtruths
_version_ 1724637683396902912