Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making?
Background: In times of continuous change and volatile markets, organizations are increasingly characterized by downsizing, work intensification, and resource rationalization. This has resulted in diversification, and the emergence of new risks within the field of occupational health and safety, wit...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2013-06-01
|
Series: | Safety and Health at Work |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791113000048 |
id |
doaj-7cee3b4a60884312b4df1e51e7568c1a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7cee3b4a60884312b4df1e51e7568c1a2020-11-24T20:52:40ZengElsevierSafety and Health at Work2093-79112013-06-0142879410.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.003Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making?Melissa K. Langenhan0Stavroula Leka1Aditya Jain2Centre for Organizational Health & Development, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UKCentre for Organizational Health & Development, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UKNottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UKBackground: In times of continuous change and volatile markets, organizations are increasingly characterized by downsizing, work intensification, and resource rationalization. This has resulted in diversification, and the emergence of new risks within the field of occupational health and safety, with an important impact. This paper focuses on one such type of risk in the modern workplace—psychosocial risks. The current study aimed to explore stakeholder perspectives, regarding the extent to which psychosocial risks are incorporated into strategic risk management practices, at both the business and policy level. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 professionals, representing employer, expert, policy maker, and trade union stakeholder perspectives. Results: It was found that the majority of organizations do not sufficiently, if at all, understand and incorporate psychosocial risks into strategic decision making, whereby the key barrier related to practical difficulties of not knowing how to manage psychosocial risks adequately. Conclusion: The study found that there is a need to close the gap between policy and practice on a number of levels. Future recommendations comprise a policy framework and infrastructure underpinned by educational initiatives, partnerships, and networks to drive a shift in attitudes toward recognizing the duality of the concept of risk (including both potential negative and positive outcomes) and moving beyond simple regulatory compliance.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791113000048organizationspolicy makingpsychosocial riskstrategy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Melissa K. Langenhan Stavroula Leka Aditya Jain |
spellingShingle |
Melissa K. Langenhan Stavroula Leka Aditya Jain Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making? Safety and Health at Work organizations policy making psychosocial risk strategy |
author_facet |
Melissa K. Langenhan Stavroula Leka Aditya Jain |
author_sort |
Melissa K. Langenhan |
title |
Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making? |
title_short |
Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making? |
title_full |
Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making? |
title_fullStr |
Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making? |
title_sort |
psychosocial risks: is risk management strategic enough in business and policy making? |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Safety and Health at Work |
issn |
2093-7911 |
publishDate |
2013-06-01 |
description |
Background: In times of continuous change and volatile markets, organizations are increasingly characterized by downsizing, work intensification, and resource rationalization. This has resulted in diversification, and the emergence of new risks within the field of occupational health and safety, with an important impact. This paper focuses on one such type of risk in the modern workplace—psychosocial risks. The current study aimed to explore stakeholder perspectives, regarding the extent to which psychosocial risks are incorporated into strategic risk management practices, at both the business and policy level.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 professionals, representing employer, expert, policy maker, and trade union stakeholder perspectives.
Results: It was found that the majority of organizations do not sufficiently, if at all, understand and incorporate psychosocial risks into strategic decision making, whereby the key barrier related to practical difficulties of not knowing how to manage psychosocial risks adequately.
Conclusion: The study found that there is a need to close the gap between policy and practice on a number of levels. Future recommendations comprise a policy framework and infrastructure underpinned by educational initiatives, partnerships, and networks to drive a shift in attitudes toward recognizing the duality of the concept of risk (including both potential negative and positive outcomes) and moving beyond simple regulatory compliance. |
topic |
organizations policy making psychosocial risk strategy |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791113000048 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT melissaklangenhan psychosocialrisksisriskmanagementstrategicenoughinbusinessandpolicymaking AT stavroulaleka psychosocialrisksisriskmanagementstrategicenoughinbusinessandpolicymaking AT adityajain psychosocialrisksisriskmanagementstrategicenoughinbusinessandpolicymaking |
_version_ |
1716798953337389056 |