Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making?

Background: In times of continuous change and volatile markets, organizations are increasingly characterized by downsizing, work intensification, and resource rationalization. This has resulted in diversification, and the emergence of new risks within the field of occupational health and safety, wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa K. Langenhan, Stavroula Leka, Aditya Jain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-06-01
Series:Safety and Health at Work
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791113000048
id doaj-7cee3b4a60884312b4df1e51e7568c1a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7cee3b4a60884312b4df1e51e7568c1a2020-11-24T20:52:40ZengElsevierSafety and Health at Work2093-79112013-06-0142879410.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.003Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making?Melissa K. Langenhan0Stavroula Leka1Aditya Jain2Centre for Organizational Health & Development, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UKCentre for Organizational Health & Development, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UKNottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UKBackground: In times of continuous change and volatile markets, organizations are increasingly characterized by downsizing, work intensification, and resource rationalization. This has resulted in diversification, and the emergence of new risks within the field of occupational health and safety, with an important impact. This paper focuses on one such type of risk in the modern workplace—psychosocial risks. The current study aimed to explore stakeholder perspectives, regarding the extent to which psychosocial risks are incorporated into strategic risk management practices, at both the business and policy level. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 professionals, representing employer, expert, policy maker, and trade union stakeholder perspectives. Results: It was found that the majority of organizations do not sufficiently, if at all, understand and incorporate psychosocial risks into strategic decision making, whereby the key barrier related to practical difficulties of not knowing how to manage psychosocial risks adequately. Conclusion: The study found that there is a need to close the gap between policy and practice on a number of levels. Future recommendations comprise a policy framework and infrastructure underpinned by educational initiatives, partnerships, and networks to drive a shift in attitudes toward recognizing the duality of the concept of risk (including both potential negative and positive outcomes) and moving beyond simple regulatory compliance.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791113000048organizationspolicy makingpsychosocial riskstrategy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Melissa K. Langenhan
Stavroula Leka
Aditya Jain
spellingShingle Melissa K. Langenhan
Stavroula Leka
Aditya Jain
Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making?
Safety and Health at Work
organizations
policy making
psychosocial risk
strategy
author_facet Melissa K. Langenhan
Stavroula Leka
Aditya Jain
author_sort Melissa K. Langenhan
title Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making?
title_short Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making?
title_full Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making?
title_fullStr Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making?
title_full_unstemmed Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making?
title_sort psychosocial risks: is risk management strategic enough in business and policy making?
publisher Elsevier
series Safety and Health at Work
issn 2093-7911
publishDate 2013-06-01
description Background: In times of continuous change and volatile markets, organizations are increasingly characterized by downsizing, work intensification, and resource rationalization. This has resulted in diversification, and the emergence of new risks within the field of occupational health and safety, with an important impact. This paper focuses on one such type of risk in the modern workplace—psychosocial risks. The current study aimed to explore stakeholder perspectives, regarding the extent to which psychosocial risks are incorporated into strategic risk management practices, at both the business and policy level. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 professionals, representing employer, expert, policy maker, and trade union stakeholder perspectives. Results: It was found that the majority of organizations do not sufficiently, if at all, understand and incorporate psychosocial risks into strategic decision making, whereby the key barrier related to practical difficulties of not knowing how to manage psychosocial risks adequately. Conclusion: The study found that there is a need to close the gap between policy and practice on a number of levels. Future recommendations comprise a policy framework and infrastructure underpinned by educational initiatives, partnerships, and networks to drive a shift in attitudes toward recognizing the duality of the concept of risk (including both potential negative and positive outcomes) and moving beyond simple regulatory compliance.
topic organizations
policy making
psychosocial risk
strategy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791113000048
work_keys_str_mv AT melissaklangenhan psychosocialrisksisriskmanagementstrategicenoughinbusinessandpolicymaking
AT stavroulaleka psychosocialrisksisriskmanagementstrategicenoughinbusinessandpolicymaking
AT adityajain psychosocialrisksisriskmanagementstrategicenoughinbusinessandpolicymaking
_version_ 1716798953337389056