Screening Thermal Shock as an Apple Blossom Thinning Method. II. Pollen Tube Growth and Spur Leaf Injury in Response to Temperature and Duration of Thermal Shock

Blossom thinning can confer significant benefits to apple growers, including increased fruit size and annual bearing. However, current blossom thinning practices can damage spur leaves and/or fruit. We evaluated the use of short duration forced heated air treatments [thermal shock (TS)] as a blossom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas M. Kon, Melanie A. Schupp, Hans E. Winzeler, James R. Schupp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS) 2020-04-01
Series:HortScience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/5/article-p632.xml
id doaj-7ce244d84e834f729246c605626481d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7ce244d84e834f729246c605626481d12020-11-25T03:57:42ZengAmerican Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS)HortScience2327-98342020-04-01555632636https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14619-19Screening Thermal Shock as an Apple Blossom Thinning Method. II. Pollen Tube Growth and Spur Leaf Injury in Response to Temperature and Duration of Thermal ShockThomas M. Kon Melanie A. Schupp Hans E. Winzeler James R. Schupp Blossom thinning can confer significant benefits to apple growers, including increased fruit size and annual bearing. However, current blossom thinning practices can damage spur leaves and/or fruit. We evaluated the use of short duration forced heated air treatments [thermal shock (TS)] as a blossom thinning strategy for ‘York Imperial’. Using a variable-temperature heat gun, TS treatments were applied to solitary blossoms 24 hours after pollination. Effects of output temperature (five levels) and treatment duration (four levels) were evaluated using a completely randomized design with a factorial treatment structure. Short duration treatments (0.5 and 1.0 seconds) were ineffective for arresting pollen tube growth in vivo. TS temperature required to inhibit stylar pollen tube growth was inconsistent across years. In 2014, TS temperatures ≥56 °C inhibited pollen tubes from reaching the style base at 2.0 and 4.0 second durations. However, in 2015, TS temperatures ≥81 °C at 4.0 seconds prevented pollen tubes from reaching the style base. Inconsistent effects of TS across years were attributed to treatments being applied too late due to optimal conditions for pollen tube growth during the intervening 24-hour period after pollination. Excessive injury to spur leaf tissue was observed at temperatures higher than 84 °C and 70 °C (2.0 and 4.0 seconds, respectively). Pollen tube growth was reduced or arrested at temperature and duration combinations that caused minimal visible injury to spur leaves. Identifying and exploiting structural differences between apple blossoms and vegetative spur leaves may provide insight for the future development of TS or other attempts at developing selective thinning technologies.https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/5/article-p632.xmlbloom thinner; crop load management; heat damage; malus ×domestica; phytotoxicity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas M. Kon
Melanie A. Schupp
Hans E. Winzeler
James R. Schupp
spellingShingle Thomas M. Kon
Melanie A. Schupp
Hans E. Winzeler
James R. Schupp
Screening Thermal Shock as an Apple Blossom Thinning Method. II. Pollen Tube Growth and Spur Leaf Injury in Response to Temperature and Duration of Thermal Shock
HortScience
bloom thinner; crop load management; heat damage; malus ×domestica; phytotoxicity
author_facet Thomas M. Kon
Melanie A. Schupp
Hans E. Winzeler
James R. Schupp
author_sort Thomas M. Kon
title Screening Thermal Shock as an Apple Blossom Thinning Method. II. Pollen Tube Growth and Spur Leaf Injury in Response to Temperature and Duration of Thermal Shock
title_short Screening Thermal Shock as an Apple Blossom Thinning Method. II. Pollen Tube Growth and Spur Leaf Injury in Response to Temperature and Duration of Thermal Shock
title_full Screening Thermal Shock as an Apple Blossom Thinning Method. II. Pollen Tube Growth and Spur Leaf Injury in Response to Temperature and Duration of Thermal Shock
title_fullStr Screening Thermal Shock as an Apple Blossom Thinning Method. II. Pollen Tube Growth and Spur Leaf Injury in Response to Temperature and Duration of Thermal Shock
title_full_unstemmed Screening Thermal Shock as an Apple Blossom Thinning Method. II. Pollen Tube Growth and Spur Leaf Injury in Response to Temperature and Duration of Thermal Shock
title_sort screening thermal shock as an apple blossom thinning method. ii. pollen tube growth and spur leaf injury in response to temperature and duration of thermal shock
publisher American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS)
series HortScience
issn 2327-9834
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Blossom thinning can confer significant benefits to apple growers, including increased fruit size and annual bearing. However, current blossom thinning practices can damage spur leaves and/or fruit. We evaluated the use of short duration forced heated air treatments [thermal shock (TS)] as a blossom thinning strategy for ‘York Imperial’. Using a variable-temperature heat gun, TS treatments were applied to solitary blossoms 24 hours after pollination. Effects of output temperature (five levels) and treatment duration (four levels) were evaluated using a completely randomized design with a factorial treatment structure. Short duration treatments (0.5 and 1.0 seconds) were ineffective for arresting pollen tube growth in vivo. TS temperature required to inhibit stylar pollen tube growth was inconsistent across years. In 2014, TS temperatures ≥56 °C inhibited pollen tubes from reaching the style base at 2.0 and 4.0 second durations. However, in 2015, TS temperatures ≥81 °C at 4.0 seconds prevented pollen tubes from reaching the style base. Inconsistent effects of TS across years were attributed to treatments being applied too late due to optimal conditions for pollen tube growth during the intervening 24-hour period after pollination. Excessive injury to spur leaf tissue was observed at temperatures higher than 84 °C and 70 °C (2.0 and 4.0 seconds, respectively). Pollen tube growth was reduced or arrested at temperature and duration combinations that caused minimal visible injury to spur leaves. Identifying and exploiting structural differences between apple blossoms and vegetative spur leaves may provide insight for the future development of TS or other attempts at developing selective thinning technologies.
topic bloom thinner; crop load management; heat damage; malus ×domestica; phytotoxicity
url https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/5/article-p632.xml
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasmkon screeningthermalshockasanappleblossomthinningmethodiipollentubegrowthandspurleafinjuryinresponsetotemperatureanddurationofthermalshock
AT melanieaschupp screeningthermalshockasanappleblossomthinningmethodiipollentubegrowthandspurleafinjuryinresponsetotemperatureanddurationofthermalshock
AT hansewinzeler screeningthermalshockasanappleblossomthinningmethodiipollentubegrowthandspurleafinjuryinresponsetotemperatureanddurationofthermalshock
AT jamesrschupp screeningthermalshockasanappleblossomthinningmethodiipollentubegrowthandspurleafinjuryinresponsetotemperatureanddurationofthermalshock
_version_ 1724459232983515136