Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance

This article makes an interpretation, from a historical institutional perspective, of the idea of Chinese wisdom and solutions for global governance introduced in the recent Chinese official discourse. Its main objective is to shed some light on the strength of the cultural values of China’s histor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Camilo Enrique Defelipe Villa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad del Rosario, Bogota 2020-01-01
Series:Desafíos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/7677
id doaj-7ccd8f1eb95c4594a272db007d1e9b88
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7ccd8f1eb95c4594a272db007d1e9b882021-09-20T12:52:56ZengUniversidad del Rosario, BogotaDesafíos0124-40352145-51122020-01-0132110.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.7677Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global GovernanceCamilo Enrique Defelipe Villa0Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, sede Bogotá; East China Normal University, Shanghái y Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá This article makes an interpretation, from a historical institutional perspective, of the idea of Chinese wisdom and solutions for global governance introduced in the recent Chinese official discourse. Its main objective is to shed some light on the strength of the cultural values of China’s historical institutions to negotiate the universalization of neoliberal values and normative standards. The article organization is as follows. First, it places the Chinese economic model within the concept of Sinicization. Second, it characterizes the continuity of the indigenous elements of that model, emphasizing the informal relational patterns of Chinese culture. Third, it questions the resilience of such values against the predatory effects of neoliberal style modernization and the government’s reintroduction of traditional culture narratives. Fourth, it looks at some cases of collaborative local governance; finally, it provides some concluding remarks on the demonstrative role of Chinese historical institutions vis-à-vis the normative meaning of Chinese cultural wisdom and solutions for world governance. https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/7677Chinese wisdom and solutionsSinicizationinstitutionsinformalitycollaborative governance.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Camilo Enrique Defelipe Villa
spellingShingle Camilo Enrique Defelipe Villa
Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance
Desafíos
Chinese wisdom and solutions
Sinicization
institutions
informality
collaborative governance.
author_facet Camilo Enrique Defelipe Villa
author_sort Camilo Enrique Defelipe Villa
title Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance
title_short Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance
title_full Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance
title_fullStr Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance
title_full_unstemmed Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance
title_sort chinese historical institutions and their contribution for global governance
publisher Universidad del Rosario, Bogota
series Desafíos
issn 0124-4035
2145-5112
publishDate 2020-01-01
description This article makes an interpretation, from a historical institutional perspective, of the idea of Chinese wisdom and solutions for global governance introduced in the recent Chinese official discourse. Its main objective is to shed some light on the strength of the cultural values of China’s historical institutions to negotiate the universalization of neoliberal values and normative standards. The article organization is as follows. First, it places the Chinese economic model within the concept of Sinicization. Second, it characterizes the continuity of the indigenous elements of that model, emphasizing the informal relational patterns of Chinese culture. Third, it questions the resilience of such values against the predatory effects of neoliberal style modernization and the government’s reintroduction of traditional culture narratives. Fourth, it looks at some cases of collaborative local governance; finally, it provides some concluding remarks on the demonstrative role of Chinese historical institutions vis-à-vis the normative meaning of Chinese cultural wisdom and solutions for world governance.
topic Chinese wisdom and solutions
Sinicization
institutions
informality
collaborative governance.
url https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/7677
work_keys_str_mv AT camiloenriquedefelipevilla chinesehistoricalinstitutionsandtheircontributionforglobalgovernance
_version_ 1717374418936659968