Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance
This article makes an interpretation, from a historical institutional perspective, of the idea of Chinese wisdom and solutions for global governance introduced in the recent Chinese official discourse. Its main objective is to shed some light on the strength of the cultural values of China’s histor...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad del Rosario, Bogota
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Desafíos |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/7677 |
id |
doaj-7ccd8f1eb95c4594a272db007d1e9b88 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7ccd8f1eb95c4594a272db007d1e9b882021-09-20T12:52:56ZengUniversidad del Rosario, BogotaDesafíos0124-40352145-51122020-01-0132110.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.7677Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global GovernanceCamilo Enrique Defelipe Villa0Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, sede Bogotá; East China Normal University, Shanghái y Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá This article makes an interpretation, from a historical institutional perspective, of the idea of Chinese wisdom and solutions for global governance introduced in the recent Chinese official discourse. Its main objective is to shed some light on the strength of the cultural values of China’s historical institutions to negotiate the universalization of neoliberal values and normative standards. The article organization is as follows. First, it places the Chinese economic model within the concept of Sinicization. Second, it characterizes the continuity of the indigenous elements of that model, emphasizing the informal relational patterns of Chinese culture. Third, it questions the resilience of such values against the predatory effects of neoliberal style modernization and the government’s reintroduction of traditional culture narratives. Fourth, it looks at some cases of collaborative local governance; finally, it provides some concluding remarks on the demonstrative role of Chinese historical institutions vis-à-vis the normative meaning of Chinese cultural wisdom and solutions for world governance. https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/7677Chinese wisdom and solutionsSinicizationinstitutionsinformalitycollaborative governance. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Camilo Enrique Defelipe Villa |
spellingShingle |
Camilo Enrique Defelipe Villa Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance Desafíos Chinese wisdom and solutions Sinicization institutions informality collaborative governance. |
author_facet |
Camilo Enrique Defelipe Villa |
author_sort |
Camilo Enrique Defelipe Villa |
title |
Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance |
title_short |
Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance |
title_full |
Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance |
title_fullStr |
Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chinese Historical Institutions and their Contribution for Global Governance |
title_sort |
chinese historical institutions and their contribution for global governance |
publisher |
Universidad del Rosario, Bogota |
series |
Desafíos |
issn |
0124-4035 2145-5112 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
This article makes an interpretation, from a historical institutional perspective, of the idea of Chinese wisdom and solutions for global governance introduced in the recent Chinese official discourse. Its main objective is to shed some light on the strength of the cultural values of China’s historical institutions to negotiate the universalization of neoliberal values and normative standards. The article organization is as follows. First, it places the Chinese economic model within the concept of Sinicization. Second, it characterizes the continuity of the indigenous elements of that model, emphasizing the informal relational patterns of Chinese culture. Third, it questions the resilience of such values against the predatory effects of neoliberal style modernization and the government’s reintroduction of traditional culture narratives. Fourth, it looks at some cases of collaborative local governance; finally, it provides some concluding remarks on the demonstrative role of Chinese historical institutions vis-à-vis the normative meaning of Chinese cultural wisdom and solutions for world governance.
|
topic |
Chinese wisdom and solutions Sinicization institutions informality collaborative governance. |
url |
https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/7677 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT camiloenriquedefelipevilla chinesehistoricalinstitutionsandtheircontributionforglobalgovernance |
_version_ |
1717374418936659968 |