Learning Labels for Objects: Does Degree of Sensorimotor Experience Matter?

Theories of embodied cognition propose that sensorimotor experience is essential to learning, representing, and accessing conceptual information. Embodied effects have been observed in early child development and adult cognitive processing, but there has been less research examining the role of embo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michele Wellsby, Penny Pexman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Languages
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/4/1/3
id doaj-7cc4510c4d2e4cf68b2b4f94a4128507
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7cc4510c4d2e4cf68b2b4f94a41285072020-11-25T01:22:10ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2019-01-0141310.3390/languages4010003languages4010003Learning Labels for Objects: Does Degree of Sensorimotor Experience Matter?Michele Wellsby0Penny Pexman1Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, CanadaTheories of embodied cognition propose that sensorimotor experience is essential to learning, representing, and accessing conceptual information. Embodied effects have been observed in early child development and adult cognitive processing, but there has been less research examining the role of embodiment in later childhood. We conducted two experiments to test whether degree of sensorimotor experience modulates children’s word learning. In Experiment 1, 5-year-old children learned labels for 10 unfamiliar objects in one of six learning conditions, which varied in how much sensorimotor experience and information about the objects children received. Children’s word learning was assessed with a recognition test. Results indicated that there was no effect of learning condition on recognition accuracy, as children performed equally well in all conditions. In Experiment 2, we modified the stimuli to emphasize the sensory features of the objects; 5-year-old children learned labels for these objects in one of two learning conditions. Once again, there was no effect of learning condition on children’s recognition accuracy performance. Overall, children’s word learning was not modulated by the extent to which they had sensorimotor experience with the labelled objects. As such, the results place some limits on the role of embodiment in language learning.http://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/4/1/3embodied cognitionlanguage developmentsensorimotorlabel learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michele Wellsby
Penny Pexman
spellingShingle Michele Wellsby
Penny Pexman
Learning Labels for Objects: Does Degree of Sensorimotor Experience Matter?
Languages
embodied cognition
language development
sensorimotor
label learning
author_facet Michele Wellsby
Penny Pexman
author_sort Michele Wellsby
title Learning Labels for Objects: Does Degree of Sensorimotor Experience Matter?
title_short Learning Labels for Objects: Does Degree of Sensorimotor Experience Matter?
title_full Learning Labels for Objects: Does Degree of Sensorimotor Experience Matter?
title_fullStr Learning Labels for Objects: Does Degree of Sensorimotor Experience Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Learning Labels for Objects: Does Degree of Sensorimotor Experience Matter?
title_sort learning labels for objects: does degree of sensorimotor experience matter?
publisher MDPI AG
series Languages
issn 2226-471X
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Theories of embodied cognition propose that sensorimotor experience is essential to learning, representing, and accessing conceptual information. Embodied effects have been observed in early child development and adult cognitive processing, but there has been less research examining the role of embodiment in later childhood. We conducted two experiments to test whether degree of sensorimotor experience modulates children’s word learning. In Experiment 1, 5-year-old children learned labels for 10 unfamiliar objects in one of six learning conditions, which varied in how much sensorimotor experience and information about the objects children received. Children’s word learning was assessed with a recognition test. Results indicated that there was no effect of learning condition on recognition accuracy, as children performed equally well in all conditions. In Experiment 2, we modified the stimuli to emphasize the sensory features of the objects; 5-year-old children learned labels for these objects in one of two learning conditions. Once again, there was no effect of learning condition on children’s recognition accuracy performance. Overall, children’s word learning was not modulated by the extent to which they had sensorimotor experience with the labelled objects. As such, the results place some limits on the role of embodiment in language learning.
topic embodied cognition
language development
sensorimotor
label learning
url http://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/4/1/3
work_keys_str_mv AT michelewellsby learninglabelsforobjectsdoesdegreeofsensorimotorexperiencematter
AT pennypexman learninglabelsforobjectsdoesdegreeofsensorimotorexperiencematter
_version_ 1725127338532798464