Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients

<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the low contrast detectability sensitivity among 4-slice, 8-slice and 16-slice CT units using various mAs settings. Findings of the study may elucidate the most optimal imaging parameter for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients who are n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dennis N Stanley, G Narayanasamy, C Breton, Niko Papanikolaou, Alonso N Gutierrez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IJCTO 2014-03-01
Series:International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology
Online Access:http://ijcto.org/index.php/IJCTO/article/view/122
id doaj-7cc37728cbb5406895e4685b6b46d742
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7cc37728cbb5406895e4685b6b46d7422020-11-24T22:29:04ZengIJCTOInternational Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology 2330-40492014-03-012273Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patientsDennis N Stanley0G Narayanasamy1C BretonNiko Papanikolaou2Alonso N Gutierrez3University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the low contrast detectability sensitivity among 4-slice, 8-slice and 16-slice CT units using various mAs settings. Findings of the study may elucidate the most optimal imaging parameter for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients who are not MRI compatible.</p><p><strong>Methods and Materials</strong>: Low contrast targets in the CATPHAN phantom (model: CTP 504, The Phantom Laboratory) were imaged on a 4-slice LightSpeed Advantage™ GE CT scanner (GE Healthcare, WI) and a 16- slice LightSpeed Advantage™ GE CT scanner (GE Healthcare, WI) in 8-slice and 16-slice mode. The CATPHAN CTP515 low contrast targets of size 15, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 mm for each contrast difference of 1%, 0.5% and 0.3% from the water-equivalent background was imaged using a SRS protocol. Two image sets per setting were acquired for mAs parameters of 300, 350 and 440. Images were evaluated in a blind study by three independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using 300,350 and 440mAs settings on the 4-slice scanner, the average smallest diameters recorded at 1% contrast were 5 ± 1 mm, 5 ± 1 mm and 5 ± 0 mm and at 0.5% were 7 ± 2 mm, 7 ± 1 mm and 6 ± 1 mm. For the 8 - slice scanner, the average smallest diameters recorded at 1% contrast were 7 ± 0 mm, 6 ± 0 mm and 5 ± 0 mm, and at 0.5% were 12 ± 3 mm, 9 ± 1 mm and 6 ± 1 mm. For the 16 - slice scanner, the average smallest diameters recorded at 1% contrast were 7 ± 1 mm, 7 ± 1 mm and 6 ± 1 mm, and at 0.5% were 11 ± 3 mm, 8 ± 1 mm and 8 ± 1 mm. A difference was observed between the 4 and 8 - slice scanners at 300mAs (p &lt; 0.01) for each contrast level as well as the 4 and 16 slice at 440 (p &lt; 0.01) and 350 (p &lt; 0.01) mAs. Additionally, a difference was observed between each mAs for the 8 slice at 1% (p &lt; 0.01) and 0.5% (p &lt; 0.01) contrast.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Results demonstrate consistently improved low contrast detectability as mAs was increased. CT simulation imaging parameters can be optimized to improve low contrast sensitivity for non MRI compatible SRS patients.</p><p>----------------</p><p><strong>Cite this article as</strong>: Stanley D, Narayanasamy G, Breton C, Papanikolaou N, Gutierrez AN. Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(2):020237. <strong>DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0202.37</strong><br /><br /><br /></p>http://ijcto.org/index.php/IJCTO/article/view/122
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dennis N Stanley
G Narayanasamy
C Breton
Niko Papanikolaou
Alonso N Gutierrez
spellingShingle Dennis N Stanley
G Narayanasamy
C Breton
Niko Papanikolaou
Alonso N Gutierrez
Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients
International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology
author_facet Dennis N Stanley
G Narayanasamy
C Breton
Niko Papanikolaou
Alonso N Gutierrez
author_sort Dennis N Stanley
title Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients
title_short Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients
title_full Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients
title_fullStr Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients
title_sort comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice ct units using various mas setting for the potential benefit of non-mri compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (srs) patients
publisher IJCTO
series International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology
issn 2330-4049
publishDate 2014-03-01
description <p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the low contrast detectability sensitivity among 4-slice, 8-slice and 16-slice CT units using various mAs settings. Findings of the study may elucidate the most optimal imaging parameter for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients who are not MRI compatible.</p><p><strong>Methods and Materials</strong>: Low contrast targets in the CATPHAN phantom (model: CTP 504, The Phantom Laboratory) were imaged on a 4-slice LightSpeed Advantage™ GE CT scanner (GE Healthcare, WI) and a 16- slice LightSpeed Advantage™ GE CT scanner (GE Healthcare, WI) in 8-slice and 16-slice mode. The CATPHAN CTP515 low contrast targets of size 15, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 mm for each contrast difference of 1%, 0.5% and 0.3% from the water-equivalent background was imaged using a SRS protocol. Two image sets per setting were acquired for mAs parameters of 300, 350 and 440. Images were evaluated in a blind study by three independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using 300,350 and 440mAs settings on the 4-slice scanner, the average smallest diameters recorded at 1% contrast were 5 ± 1 mm, 5 ± 1 mm and 5 ± 0 mm and at 0.5% were 7 ± 2 mm, 7 ± 1 mm and 6 ± 1 mm. For the 8 - slice scanner, the average smallest diameters recorded at 1% contrast were 7 ± 0 mm, 6 ± 0 mm and 5 ± 0 mm, and at 0.5% were 12 ± 3 mm, 9 ± 1 mm and 6 ± 1 mm. For the 16 - slice scanner, the average smallest diameters recorded at 1% contrast were 7 ± 1 mm, 7 ± 1 mm and 6 ± 1 mm, and at 0.5% were 11 ± 3 mm, 8 ± 1 mm and 8 ± 1 mm. A difference was observed between the 4 and 8 - slice scanners at 300mAs (p &lt; 0.01) for each contrast level as well as the 4 and 16 slice at 440 (p &lt; 0.01) and 350 (p &lt; 0.01) mAs. Additionally, a difference was observed between each mAs for the 8 slice at 1% (p &lt; 0.01) and 0.5% (p &lt; 0.01) contrast.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Results demonstrate consistently improved low contrast detectability as mAs was increased. CT simulation imaging parameters can be optimized to improve low contrast sensitivity for non MRI compatible SRS patients.</p><p>----------------</p><p><strong>Cite this article as</strong>: Stanley D, Narayanasamy G, Breton C, Papanikolaou N, Gutierrez AN. Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(2):020237. <strong>DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0202.37</strong><br /><br /><br /></p>
url http://ijcto.org/index.php/IJCTO/article/view/122
work_keys_str_mv AT dennisnstanley comparisonoflowcontrastsensitivityamongmultislicectunitsusingvariousmassettingforthepotentialbenefitofnonmricompatiblestereotacticradiosurgerysrspatients
AT gnarayanasamy comparisonoflowcontrastsensitivityamongmultislicectunitsusingvariousmassettingforthepotentialbenefitofnonmricompatiblestereotacticradiosurgerysrspatients
AT cbreton comparisonoflowcontrastsensitivityamongmultislicectunitsusingvariousmassettingforthepotentialbenefitofnonmricompatiblestereotacticradiosurgerysrspatients
AT nikopapanikolaou comparisonoflowcontrastsensitivityamongmultislicectunitsusingvariousmassettingforthepotentialbenefitofnonmricompatiblestereotacticradiosurgerysrspatients
AT alonsongutierrez comparisonoflowcontrastsensitivityamongmultislicectunitsusingvariousmassettingforthepotentialbenefitofnonmricompatiblestereotacticradiosurgerysrspatients
_version_ 1725744996726865920