Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients
<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the low contrast detectability sensitivity among 4-slice, 8-slice and 16-slice CT units using various mAs settings. Findings of the study may elucidate the most optimal imaging parameter for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients who are n...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IJCTO
2014-03-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology |
Online Access: | http://ijcto.org/index.php/IJCTO/article/view/122 |
id |
doaj-7cc37728cbb5406895e4685b6b46d742 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7cc37728cbb5406895e4685b6b46d7422020-11-24T22:29:04ZengIJCTOInternational Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology 2330-40492014-03-012273Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patientsDennis N Stanley0G Narayanasamy1C BretonNiko Papanikolaou2Alonso N Gutierrez3University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the low contrast detectability sensitivity among 4-slice, 8-slice and 16-slice CT units using various mAs settings. Findings of the study may elucidate the most optimal imaging parameter for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients who are not MRI compatible.</p><p><strong>Methods and Materials</strong>: Low contrast targets in the CATPHAN phantom (model: CTP 504, The Phantom Laboratory) were imaged on a 4-slice LightSpeed Advantage™ GE CT scanner (GE Healthcare, WI) and a 16- slice LightSpeed Advantage™ GE CT scanner (GE Healthcare, WI) in 8-slice and 16-slice mode. The CATPHAN CTP515 low contrast targets of size 15, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 mm for each contrast difference of 1%, 0.5% and 0.3% from the water-equivalent background was imaged using a SRS protocol. Two image sets per setting were acquired for mAs parameters of 300, 350 and 440. Images were evaluated in a blind study by three independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using 300,350 and 440mAs settings on the 4-slice scanner, the average smallest diameters recorded at 1% contrast were 5 ± 1 mm, 5 ± 1 mm and 5 ± 0 mm and at 0.5% were 7 ± 2 mm, 7 ± 1 mm and 6 ± 1 mm. For the 8 - slice scanner, the average smallest diameters recorded at 1% contrast were 7 ± 0 mm, 6 ± 0 mm and 5 ± 0 mm, and at 0.5% were 12 ± 3 mm, 9 ± 1 mm and 6 ± 1 mm. For the 16 - slice scanner, the average smallest diameters recorded at 1% contrast were 7 ± 1 mm, 7 ± 1 mm and 6 ± 1 mm, and at 0.5% were 11 ± 3 mm, 8 ± 1 mm and 8 ± 1 mm. A difference was observed between the 4 and 8 - slice scanners at 300mAs (p < 0.01) for each contrast level as well as the 4 and 16 slice at 440 (p < 0.01) and 350 (p < 0.01) mAs. Additionally, a difference was observed between each mAs for the 8 slice at 1% (p < 0.01) and 0.5% (p < 0.01) contrast.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Results demonstrate consistently improved low contrast detectability as mAs was increased. CT simulation imaging parameters can be optimized to improve low contrast sensitivity for non MRI compatible SRS patients.</p><p>----------------</p><p><strong>Cite this article as</strong>: Stanley D, Narayanasamy G, Breton C, Papanikolaou N, Gutierrez AN. Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(2):020237. <strong>DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0202.37</strong><br /><br /><br /></p>http://ijcto.org/index.php/IJCTO/article/view/122 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dennis N Stanley G Narayanasamy C Breton Niko Papanikolaou Alonso N Gutierrez |
spellingShingle |
Dennis N Stanley G Narayanasamy C Breton Niko Papanikolaou Alonso N Gutierrez Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology |
author_facet |
Dennis N Stanley G Narayanasamy C Breton Niko Papanikolaou Alonso N Gutierrez |
author_sort |
Dennis N Stanley |
title |
Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients |
title_short |
Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients |
title_full |
Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients |
title_sort |
comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice ct units using various mas setting for the potential benefit of non-mri compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (srs) patients |
publisher |
IJCTO |
series |
International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology |
issn |
2330-4049 |
publishDate |
2014-03-01 |
description |
<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the low contrast detectability sensitivity among 4-slice, 8-slice and 16-slice CT units using various mAs settings. Findings of the study may elucidate the most optimal imaging parameter for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients who are not MRI compatible.</p><p><strong>Methods and Materials</strong>: Low contrast targets in the CATPHAN phantom (model: CTP 504, The Phantom Laboratory) were imaged on a 4-slice LightSpeed Advantage™ GE CT scanner (GE Healthcare, WI) and a 16- slice LightSpeed Advantage™ GE CT scanner (GE Healthcare, WI) in 8-slice and 16-slice mode. The CATPHAN CTP515 low contrast targets of size 15, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 mm for each contrast difference of 1%, 0.5% and 0.3% from the water-equivalent background was imaged using a SRS protocol. Two image sets per setting were acquired for mAs parameters of 300, 350 and 440. Images were evaluated in a blind study by three independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using 300,350 and 440mAs settings on the 4-slice scanner, the average smallest diameters recorded at 1% contrast were 5 ± 1 mm, 5 ± 1 mm and 5 ± 0 mm and at 0.5% were 7 ± 2 mm, 7 ± 1 mm and 6 ± 1 mm. For the 8 - slice scanner, the average smallest diameters recorded at 1% contrast were 7 ± 0 mm, 6 ± 0 mm and 5 ± 0 mm, and at 0.5% were 12 ± 3 mm, 9 ± 1 mm and 6 ± 1 mm. For the 16 - slice scanner, the average smallest diameters recorded at 1% contrast were 7 ± 1 mm, 7 ± 1 mm and 6 ± 1 mm, and at 0.5% were 11 ± 3 mm, 8 ± 1 mm and 8 ± 1 mm. A difference was observed between the 4 and 8 - slice scanners at 300mAs (p < 0.01) for each contrast level as well as the 4 and 16 slice at 440 (p < 0.01) and 350 (p < 0.01) mAs. Additionally, a difference was observed between each mAs for the 8 slice at 1% (p < 0.01) and 0.5% (p < 0.01) contrast.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Results demonstrate consistently improved low contrast detectability as mAs was increased. CT simulation imaging parameters can be optimized to improve low contrast sensitivity for non MRI compatible SRS patients.</p><p>----------------</p><p><strong>Cite this article as</strong>: Stanley D, Narayanasamy G, Breton C, Papanikolaou N, Gutierrez AN. Comparison of low contrast sensitivity among multi-slice CT units using various mAs setting for the potential benefit of non-MRI compatible, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2(2):020237. <strong>DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0202.37</strong><br /><br /><br /></p> |
url |
http://ijcto.org/index.php/IJCTO/article/view/122 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dennisnstanley comparisonoflowcontrastsensitivityamongmultislicectunitsusingvariousmassettingforthepotentialbenefitofnonmricompatiblestereotacticradiosurgerysrspatients AT gnarayanasamy comparisonoflowcontrastsensitivityamongmultislicectunitsusingvariousmassettingforthepotentialbenefitofnonmricompatiblestereotacticradiosurgerysrspatients AT cbreton comparisonoflowcontrastsensitivityamongmultislicectunitsusingvariousmassettingforthepotentialbenefitofnonmricompatiblestereotacticradiosurgerysrspatients AT nikopapanikolaou comparisonoflowcontrastsensitivityamongmultislicectunitsusingvariousmassettingforthepotentialbenefitofnonmricompatiblestereotacticradiosurgerysrspatients AT alonsongutierrez comparisonoflowcontrastsensitivityamongmultislicectunitsusingvariousmassettingforthepotentialbenefitofnonmricompatiblestereotacticradiosurgerysrspatients |
_version_ |
1725744996726865920 |