Multidisciplinary Optimisation of Aircraft Structures with Critical Non-Regular Areas: Current Practice and Challenges
The design optimisation of aerostructures is largely based on Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation (MDO), which is a set of tools used by the aircraft industry to size primary structures: wings, large portions of the fuselage or even an entire aircraft. The procedure is computationally expensive, a...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Aerospace |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/8/8/223 |
id |
doaj-7cb5ed5ce94e4eeabdeb034e834b24db |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7cb5ed5ce94e4eeabdeb034e834b24db2021-08-26T13:24:51ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102021-08-01822322310.3390/aerospace8080223Multidisciplinary Optimisation of Aircraft Structures with Critical Non-Regular Areas: Current Practice and ChallengesMassimo Sferza0Jelena Ninić1Dimitrios Chronopoulos2Florian Glock3Fernass Daoud4Centre for Structural Engineering and Informatics, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UKCentre for Structural Engineering and Informatics, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UKDepartment of Mechanical Engineering & Mecha(tro)nic System Dynamics (LMSD), Ghent Technology Campus, KU Leuven, 9000 Ghent, BelgiumStress Methods and Optimisation, Airbus Defence and Space, D-85077 Manching, GermanyStress Methods and Optimisation, Airbus Defence and Space, D-85077 Manching, GermanyThe design optimisation of aerostructures is largely based on Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation (MDO), which is a set of tools used by the aircraft industry to size primary structures: wings, large portions of the fuselage or even an entire aircraft. The procedure is computationally expensive, as it must account for several thousands of loadcases, multiple analyses with hundreds of thousands of degrees of freedom, thousands of design variables and millions of constraints. Because of this, the coarse Global Finite Element Model (GFEM), on which the procedure is based, cannot be further refined. The structures represented in the GFEM contain many components and non-regular areas, which require a detailed modelling to capture their complex mechanical behaviour. Instead, in the GFEM, these components are represented by simplified models with approximated stiffness, whose main role is to contribute to the identification of the load paths over the whole structure. Therefore, these parts are kept fixed and are not constrained during the optimisation, as the description of their internal deformation is not sufficiently accurate. In this paper, we show that it would nevertheless be desirable to size the non-regular areas and the overall structures at once. Firstly, we introduce the concept of non-regular areas in the context of a structural airframe MDO. Secondly, we present a literature survey on MDO with a critical review of several architectures and their current applications to aircraft design optimisation. Then, we analyse and demonstrate with examples the possible consequences of neglecting non-regular areas when MDO is applied. In the conclusion, we analyse the requirements for alternative approaches and why the current ones are not viable solutions. Lastly, we discuss which characteristics of the problem could be exploited to contain the computational cost.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/8/8/223multidisciplinary designMDOoptimisationnon-regular areasglobal–localFEM |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Massimo Sferza Jelena Ninić Dimitrios Chronopoulos Florian Glock Fernass Daoud |
spellingShingle |
Massimo Sferza Jelena Ninić Dimitrios Chronopoulos Florian Glock Fernass Daoud Multidisciplinary Optimisation of Aircraft Structures with Critical Non-Regular Areas: Current Practice and Challenges Aerospace multidisciplinary design MDO optimisation non-regular areas global–local FEM |
author_facet |
Massimo Sferza Jelena Ninić Dimitrios Chronopoulos Florian Glock Fernass Daoud |
author_sort |
Massimo Sferza |
title |
Multidisciplinary Optimisation of Aircraft Structures with Critical Non-Regular Areas: Current Practice and Challenges |
title_short |
Multidisciplinary Optimisation of Aircraft Structures with Critical Non-Regular Areas: Current Practice and Challenges |
title_full |
Multidisciplinary Optimisation of Aircraft Structures with Critical Non-Regular Areas: Current Practice and Challenges |
title_fullStr |
Multidisciplinary Optimisation of Aircraft Structures with Critical Non-Regular Areas: Current Practice and Challenges |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multidisciplinary Optimisation of Aircraft Structures with Critical Non-Regular Areas: Current Practice and Challenges |
title_sort |
multidisciplinary optimisation of aircraft structures with critical non-regular areas: current practice and challenges |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Aerospace |
issn |
2226-4310 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
The design optimisation of aerostructures is largely based on Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation (MDO), which is a set of tools used by the aircraft industry to size primary structures: wings, large portions of the fuselage or even an entire aircraft. The procedure is computationally expensive, as it must account for several thousands of loadcases, multiple analyses with hundreds of thousands of degrees of freedom, thousands of design variables and millions of constraints. Because of this, the coarse Global Finite Element Model (GFEM), on which the procedure is based, cannot be further refined. The structures represented in the GFEM contain many components and non-regular areas, which require a detailed modelling to capture their complex mechanical behaviour. Instead, in the GFEM, these components are represented by simplified models with approximated stiffness, whose main role is to contribute to the identification of the load paths over the whole structure. Therefore, these parts are kept fixed and are not constrained during the optimisation, as the description of their internal deformation is not sufficiently accurate. In this paper, we show that it would nevertheless be desirable to size the non-regular areas and the overall structures at once. Firstly, we introduce the concept of non-regular areas in the context of a structural airframe MDO. Secondly, we present a literature survey on MDO with a critical review of several architectures and their current applications to aircraft design optimisation. Then, we analyse and demonstrate with examples the possible consequences of neglecting non-regular areas when MDO is applied. In the conclusion, we analyse the requirements for alternative approaches and why the current ones are not viable solutions. Lastly, we discuss which characteristics of the problem could be exploited to contain the computational cost. |
topic |
multidisciplinary design MDO optimisation non-regular areas global–local FEM |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/8/8/223 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT massimosferza multidisciplinaryoptimisationofaircraftstructureswithcriticalnonregularareascurrentpracticeandchallenges AT jelenaninic multidisciplinaryoptimisationofaircraftstructureswithcriticalnonregularareascurrentpracticeandchallenges AT dimitrioschronopoulos multidisciplinaryoptimisationofaircraftstructureswithcriticalnonregularareascurrentpracticeandchallenges AT florianglock multidisciplinaryoptimisationofaircraftstructureswithcriticalnonregularareascurrentpracticeandchallenges AT fernassdaoud multidisciplinaryoptimisationofaircraftstructureswithcriticalnonregularareascurrentpracticeandchallenges |
_version_ |
1721195591030013952 |