Neuropsychological aspects of 10-year-old children
OBJECTIVE: To characterize neuropsychological aspects of 10-yearold children. METHOD: Out of 30 children, 26 cognitively normal 10-year-old public school students answered tests extracted from Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: Children's Revision. The study was transversal. Descriptive...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
|
Series: | Einstein (São Paulo) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082012000400007&lng=en&tlng=en |
Summary: | OBJECTIVE: To characterize neuropsychological aspects of 10-yearold children. METHOD: Out of 30 children, 26 cognitively normal 10-year-old public school students answered tests extracted from Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: Children's Revision. The study was transversal. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis were carried out. RESULTS: Most of the 10-year-old children retold a story (69.2%), understood it making correct inference (84.6%) and reproduced it adequately in writing (76.9%) - 14.9% was the average number of incorrectly written words and 0.179 was the errors per written word coefficient. Besides, 53.8% showed logical thought process and 73.1% had a correct notion of "x more than...". They got five out of eight in the visuo-spatial test, an intermediary result. These results show that the tertiary areas of units II and III are developed in most 10-year-old children. The most frequent types of written mistakes were: oral influence (26.3%), multiple representation (22.5%) and omission (18.4%). As to coding principles, the mostly uncomplied with rule was vowel nasalization at end of syllable (23,53%). CONCLUSIONS: Ten-year-old children in the studied population understood and reproduced a story orally and in writing with a low coefficient error/word. The majority completed the visuospatial tests and presented logical thought process. When "x more than..." notion is absent it may be an indicator that all is not well in the reading/writing process. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1679-4508 2317-6385 |