Selective vs. comprehensive grammar correction in writing pedagogy: Counter evidence to Truscott’s view
To date, controversy among scholars exists on whether or not teachers should react to EFL learners' written grammar errors. This study investigated the effect of three feedback types (i.e., selective, comprehensive, and the one recommended by Truscott (1999), that is, no correction) with regard...
Main Authors: | Sima Modirkhamene, Maryam Soleimani, Karim Sadeghi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Isfahan
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Applied Research on English Language |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://are.ui.ac.ir/article_21347_b25f66fa1b9fb22ca9efdf97dc255c25.pdf |
Similar Items
-
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WRITING ACCURACY OF STUDENTS ACROSS DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GRAMMATICAL SENSITIVITY
by: Ayu Rizki Septiana, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01) -
On the Differential Effects of Computer-Mediated and Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy
by: Mir Ayyoob Tabatabaei, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Recasts vs. direct corrective feedback on writing performance of high school EFL learners
by: Hassan Banaruee, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
The Role of Grammarly in Assessing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Writing
by: Muhammad Ali Ghufron, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARD WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING CLASSROOM
by: Rosdiana
Published: (2016-05-01)