Intraspecific Variability in Root Traits and Edaphic Conditions Influence Soil Microbiomes Across 12 Switchgrass Cultivars

Microbial communities help plants access nutrients and tolerate stress. Some microbiomes are specific to plant genotypes and, therefore, may contribute to intraspecific differences in plant growth and be a promising target for plant breeding. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) is a potential bioenergy c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tayler C. Ulbrich, Maren L. Friesen, Sarah S. Roley, Lisa K. Tiemann, Sarah E. Evans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The American Phytopathological Society 2021-03-01
Series:Phytobiomes Journal
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-12-19-0069-FI
id doaj-7c9c78f94fd9435c8271df717241f918
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c9c78f94fd9435c8271df717241f9182021-05-14T19:36:04ZengThe American Phytopathological SocietyPhytobiomes Journal2471-29062021-03-015110812010.1094/PBIOMES-12-19-0069-FIIntraspecific Variability in Root Traits and Edaphic Conditions Influence Soil Microbiomes Across 12 Switchgrass CultivarsTayler C. UlbrichMaren L. FriesenSarah S. RoleyLisa K. TiemannSarah E. EvansMicrobial communities help plants access nutrients and tolerate stress. Some microbiomes are specific to plant genotypes and, therefore, may contribute to intraspecific differences in plant growth and be a promising target for plant breeding. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) is a potential bioenergy crop with broad variation in yields and environmental responses; recent studies suggest that associations with distinct microbiomes may contribute to variation in cultivar yields. We used a common garden experiment to investigate variation in 12 mature switchgrass cultivar soil microbiomes and, furthermore, to examine how root traits and soil conditions influence microbiome structure. We found that average root diameter varied up to 33% among cultivars and that the cultivars also associated with distinct soil microbiomes. Cultivar had a larger effect on the soil bacterial than fungal community but both were strongly influenced by soil properties. Root traits had a weaker effect on microbiome structure but root length contributed to variation in the fungal community. Unlike the soil communities, the root bacterial communities did not group by cultivar, based on a subset of samples. Microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and the abundance of several dominant bacterial phyla varied between ecotypes but overall the differences in soil microbiomes were greater among cultivars than between ecotypes. Our findings show that there is not one soil microbiome that applies to all switchgrass cultivars, or even to each ecotype. These subtle but significant differences in root traits, microbial biomass, and the abundance of certain soil bacteria could explain differences in cultivar yields and environmental responses.https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-12-19-0069-FI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tayler C. Ulbrich
Maren L. Friesen
Sarah S. Roley
Lisa K. Tiemann
Sarah E. Evans
spellingShingle Tayler C. Ulbrich
Maren L. Friesen
Sarah S. Roley
Lisa K. Tiemann
Sarah E. Evans
Intraspecific Variability in Root Traits and Edaphic Conditions Influence Soil Microbiomes Across 12 Switchgrass Cultivars
Phytobiomes Journal
author_facet Tayler C. Ulbrich
Maren L. Friesen
Sarah S. Roley
Lisa K. Tiemann
Sarah E. Evans
author_sort Tayler C. Ulbrich
title Intraspecific Variability in Root Traits and Edaphic Conditions Influence Soil Microbiomes Across 12 Switchgrass Cultivars
title_short Intraspecific Variability in Root Traits and Edaphic Conditions Influence Soil Microbiomes Across 12 Switchgrass Cultivars
title_full Intraspecific Variability in Root Traits and Edaphic Conditions Influence Soil Microbiomes Across 12 Switchgrass Cultivars
title_fullStr Intraspecific Variability in Root Traits and Edaphic Conditions Influence Soil Microbiomes Across 12 Switchgrass Cultivars
title_full_unstemmed Intraspecific Variability in Root Traits and Edaphic Conditions Influence Soil Microbiomes Across 12 Switchgrass Cultivars
title_sort intraspecific variability in root traits and edaphic conditions influence soil microbiomes across 12 switchgrass cultivars
publisher The American Phytopathological Society
series Phytobiomes Journal
issn 2471-2906
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Microbial communities help plants access nutrients and tolerate stress. Some microbiomes are specific to plant genotypes and, therefore, may contribute to intraspecific differences in plant growth and be a promising target for plant breeding. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) is a potential bioenergy crop with broad variation in yields and environmental responses; recent studies suggest that associations with distinct microbiomes may contribute to variation in cultivar yields. We used a common garden experiment to investigate variation in 12 mature switchgrass cultivar soil microbiomes and, furthermore, to examine how root traits and soil conditions influence microbiome structure. We found that average root diameter varied up to 33% among cultivars and that the cultivars also associated with distinct soil microbiomes. Cultivar had a larger effect on the soil bacterial than fungal community but both were strongly influenced by soil properties. Root traits had a weaker effect on microbiome structure but root length contributed to variation in the fungal community. Unlike the soil communities, the root bacterial communities did not group by cultivar, based on a subset of samples. Microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and the abundance of several dominant bacterial phyla varied between ecotypes but overall the differences in soil microbiomes were greater among cultivars than between ecotypes. Our findings show that there is not one soil microbiome that applies to all switchgrass cultivars, or even to each ecotype. These subtle but significant differences in root traits, microbial biomass, and the abundance of certain soil bacteria could explain differences in cultivar yields and environmental responses.
url https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-12-19-0069-FI
work_keys_str_mv AT taylerculbrich intraspecificvariabilityinroottraitsandedaphicconditionsinfluencesoilmicrobiomesacross12switchgrasscultivars
AT marenlfriesen intraspecificvariabilityinroottraitsandedaphicconditionsinfluencesoilmicrobiomesacross12switchgrasscultivars
AT sarahsroley intraspecificvariabilityinroottraitsandedaphicconditionsinfluencesoilmicrobiomesacross12switchgrasscultivars
AT lisaktiemann intraspecificvariabilityinroottraitsandedaphicconditionsinfluencesoilmicrobiomesacross12switchgrasscultivars
AT saraheevans intraspecificvariabilityinroottraitsandedaphicconditionsinfluencesoilmicrobiomesacross12switchgrasscultivars
_version_ 1721440849753014272