Dualistiese antropologie by Paulus?

Dualistic anthropology in Paul? The question as to whether Paul's anthropology can be qualified as dualistic is, with a few exceptions, usually answered in the negative. However, although the vast majority of scholars favour the negative answer, it cannot be denied that there are instances in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: G. M.M. Pelser
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 2000-12-01
Series:HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Online Access:https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1745
id doaj-7c8a8efb5af94748a6327c6bbdcff992
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c8a8efb5af94748a6327c6bbdcff9922020-11-24T22:15:39ZafrAOSISHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 0259-94222072-80502000-12-01562/340943910.4102/hts.v56i2/3.17451489Dualistiese antropologie by Paulus?G. M.M. Pelser0Departement Nuwe-Testamentiese Wetenskap, Universiteit van PretoriaDualistic anthropology in Paul? The question as to whether Paul's anthropology can be qualified as dualistic is, with a few exceptions, usually answered in the negative. However, although the vast majority of scholars favour the negative answer, it cannot be denied that there are instances in the Pauline correspondence which are suspect, to say the least. It is for this reason that the debate has not come to a rest yet, and that the issue is still raised from time to time. The present study was prompted by recent contributions to the debate, especially those of Boyarin (1994) and Crossan (1998), in which it is claimed that Paul's anthropology can indeed be qualified as dualistic. The outcome of the study is that one has every reason to believe that in a number of passages Paul not only made use of dualistic terminology and concepts, but that he actually also conceived of human existence in a dualistic manner.https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1745
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. M.M. Pelser
spellingShingle G. M.M. Pelser
Dualistiese antropologie by Paulus?
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
author_facet G. M.M. Pelser
author_sort G. M.M. Pelser
title Dualistiese antropologie by Paulus?
title_short Dualistiese antropologie by Paulus?
title_full Dualistiese antropologie by Paulus?
title_fullStr Dualistiese antropologie by Paulus?
title_full_unstemmed Dualistiese antropologie by Paulus?
title_sort dualistiese antropologie by paulus?
publisher AOSIS
series HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
issn 0259-9422
2072-8050
publishDate 2000-12-01
description Dualistic anthropology in Paul? The question as to whether Paul's anthropology can be qualified as dualistic is, with a few exceptions, usually answered in the negative. However, although the vast majority of scholars favour the negative answer, it cannot be denied that there are instances in the Pauline correspondence which are suspect, to say the least. It is for this reason that the debate has not come to a rest yet, and that the issue is still raised from time to time. The present study was prompted by recent contributions to the debate, especially those of Boyarin (1994) and Crossan (1998), in which it is claimed that Paul's anthropology can indeed be qualified as dualistic. The outcome of the study is that one has every reason to believe that in a number of passages Paul not only made use of dualistic terminology and concepts, but that he actually also conceived of human existence in a dualistic manner.
url https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1745
work_keys_str_mv AT gmmpelser dualistieseantropologiebypaulus
_version_ 1725793990434881536