The Reform of Water Rights in South Africa

South Africa's water law dispensation changed dramatically with the promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of 1998. The previous distinction between public and private water was abolished and the public trust doctrine was statutorily incorporated. Due to the working of the public trust doctr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: G.J. Pienaar & E. van der Schyff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: School of Oriental and African Studies 2007-09-01
Series:Law, Environment and Development Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://lead-journal.org/content/07179.pdf
id doaj-7c768db6b5514bcd97bb06830af9606d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c768db6b5514bcd97bb06830af9606d2020-11-25T00:26:27ZengSchool of Oriental and African StudiesLaw, Environment and Development Journal1746-58931746-58932007-09-0132179194The Reform of Water Rights in South AfricaG.J. Pienaar & E. van der SchyffSouth Africa's water law dispensation changed dramatically with the promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of 1998. The previous distinction between public and private water was abolished and the public trust doctrine was statutorily incorporated. Due to the working of the public trust doctrine existing water use rights which were in force before 1998, were replaced by water allowances granted in the discretion of the relevant authority. Three key issues are investigated in this work. First the history and development of water rights in South Africa are discussed. Secondly the system of water allowances is analysed to determine the socio-economic effects of these measures. Thirdly the question whether the state expropriated vested rights in property through the transition brought about by the incorporation of the public trust doctrine is discussed. The new concept of property and the distinction between deprivation and expropriation as dealt with in section 25 of the Constitution are examined. It is indicated that the concept of property in South African law has been extended to include pre-existing water use rights and it is argued that it also enfolds water allocations made in terms of the Act. Due to the application of the public trust doctrine it is doubtful whether any legitimate deprivation of a water use allocation can be defined as an expropriation. This issue is considered with reference to the requirements set for deprivation and expropriation in South African law.http://lead-journal.org/content/07179.pdfConstructive expropriationdeprivationdominus fluminisexpropriationNational Water Act 36 of 1998propertypublic trust doctrinesocio-economicwaterwater use allowanceswater use rights
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G.J. Pienaar & E. van der Schyff
spellingShingle G.J. Pienaar & E. van der Schyff
The Reform of Water Rights in South Africa
Law, Environment and Development Journal
Constructive expropriation
deprivation
dominus fluminis
expropriation
National Water Act 36 of 1998
property
public trust doctrine
socio-economic
water
water use allowances
water use rights
author_facet G.J. Pienaar & E. van der Schyff
author_sort G.J. Pienaar & E. van der Schyff
title The Reform of Water Rights in South Africa
title_short The Reform of Water Rights in South Africa
title_full The Reform of Water Rights in South Africa
title_fullStr The Reform of Water Rights in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed The Reform of Water Rights in South Africa
title_sort reform of water rights in south africa
publisher School of Oriental and African Studies
series Law, Environment and Development Journal
issn 1746-5893
1746-5893
publishDate 2007-09-01
description South Africa's water law dispensation changed dramatically with the promulgation of the National Water Act 36 of 1998. The previous distinction between public and private water was abolished and the public trust doctrine was statutorily incorporated. Due to the working of the public trust doctrine existing water use rights which were in force before 1998, were replaced by water allowances granted in the discretion of the relevant authority. Three key issues are investigated in this work. First the history and development of water rights in South Africa are discussed. Secondly the system of water allowances is analysed to determine the socio-economic effects of these measures. Thirdly the question whether the state expropriated vested rights in property through the transition brought about by the incorporation of the public trust doctrine is discussed. The new concept of property and the distinction between deprivation and expropriation as dealt with in section 25 of the Constitution are examined. It is indicated that the concept of property in South African law has been extended to include pre-existing water use rights and it is argued that it also enfolds water allocations made in terms of the Act. Due to the application of the public trust doctrine it is doubtful whether any legitimate deprivation of a water use allocation can be defined as an expropriation. This issue is considered with reference to the requirements set for deprivation and expropriation in South African law.
topic Constructive expropriation
deprivation
dominus fluminis
expropriation
National Water Act 36 of 1998
property
public trust doctrine
socio-economic
water
water use allowances
water use rights
url http://lead-journal.org/content/07179.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gjpienaarevanderschyff thereformofwaterrightsinsouthafrica
AT gjpienaarevanderschyff reformofwaterrightsinsouthafrica
_version_ 1725344080239525888