Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict?

The interaction between European sources and national provisions have increased the level of uncertainty with regard to the nature of time limitation in criminal law in the Italian system. With decision no. 24/2017 the Italian Constitutional Court showed the intent to start a dialogue with the Europ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michele Caianiello
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal 2017-10-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/99
id doaj-7c6882b6e286401fa8f1356a5996244d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c6882b6e286401fa8f1356a5996244d2020-11-25T02:28:59ZspaInstituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual PenalRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal2525-510X2017-10-0133967100610.22197/rbdpp.v3i3.9956Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict?Michele Caianiello0Ordinario di Procedura penale Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna/ItáliaThe interaction between European sources and national provisions have increased the level of uncertainty with regard to the nature of time limitation in criminal law in the Italian system. With decision no. 24/2017 the Italian Constitutional Court showed the intent to start a dialogue with the European Court of Justice, after the well-known 2015 Taricco decision. However, in referring the case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling, Italian Court threatened to make use of the “counterlimits” doctrine. It emerged therefore how difficult the cohabitation is between EU law and Italian criminal law. With decision no. 24/2017 the problems raised by Taricco saga were just postponed, though they are far from being resolved. It seems difficult at the current time to understand how certain sensitive features of the Italian criminal justice system, representative of its identity, such as the time limitation provisions, could be harmonised with the supranational set of rules coming from the EU law.http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/99Diritto penale europeoLegalitàPrescrizioneProcesso penale.
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michele Caianiello
spellingShingle Michele Caianiello
Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict?
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Diritto penale europeo
Legalità
Prescrizione
Processo penale.
author_facet Michele Caianiello
author_sort Michele Caianiello
title Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict?
title_short Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict?
title_full Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict?
title_fullStr Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict?
title_full_unstemmed Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict?
title_sort criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the eu jurisprudence framework. dialogue between systems or identity conflict?
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
series Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
issn 2525-510X
publishDate 2017-10-01
description The interaction between European sources and national provisions have increased the level of uncertainty with regard to the nature of time limitation in criminal law in the Italian system. With decision no. 24/2017 the Italian Constitutional Court showed the intent to start a dialogue with the European Court of Justice, after the well-known 2015 Taricco decision. However, in referring the case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling, Italian Court threatened to make use of the “counterlimits” doctrine. It emerged therefore how difficult the cohabitation is between EU law and Italian criminal law. With decision no. 24/2017 the problems raised by Taricco saga were just postponed, though they are far from being resolved. It seems difficult at the current time to understand how certain sensitive features of the Italian criminal justice system, representative of its identity, such as the time limitation provisions, could be harmonised with the supranational set of rules coming from the EU law.
topic Diritto penale europeo
Legalità
Prescrizione
Processo penale.
url http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/99
work_keys_str_mv AT michelecaianiello criminalprocessandlimitationperiodsprovisionsintheeujurisprudenceframeworkdialoguebetweensystemsoridentityconflict
_version_ 1724835097306202112