Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict?
The interaction between European sources and national provisions have increased the level of uncertainty with regard to the nature of time limitation in criminal law in the Italian system. With decision no. 24/2017 the Italian Constitutional Court showed the intent to start a dialogue with the Europ...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/99 |
id |
doaj-7c6882b6e286401fa8f1356a5996244d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7c6882b6e286401fa8f1356a5996244d2020-11-25T02:28:59ZspaInstituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual PenalRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal2525-510X2017-10-0133967100610.22197/rbdpp.v3i3.9956Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict?Michele Caianiello0Ordinario di Procedura penale Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna/ItáliaThe interaction between European sources and national provisions have increased the level of uncertainty with regard to the nature of time limitation in criminal law in the Italian system. With decision no. 24/2017 the Italian Constitutional Court showed the intent to start a dialogue with the European Court of Justice, after the well-known 2015 Taricco decision. However, in referring the case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling, Italian Court threatened to make use of the “counterlimits” doctrine. It emerged therefore how difficult the cohabitation is between EU law and Italian criminal law. With decision no. 24/2017 the problems raised by Taricco saga were just postponed, though they are far from being resolved. It seems difficult at the current time to understand how certain sensitive features of the Italian criminal justice system, representative of its identity, such as the time limitation provisions, could be harmonised with the supranational set of rules coming from the EU law.http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/99Diritto penale europeoLegalitàPrescrizioneProcesso penale. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michele Caianiello |
spellingShingle |
Michele Caianiello Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict? Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal Diritto penale europeo Legalità Prescrizione Processo penale. |
author_facet |
Michele Caianiello |
author_sort |
Michele Caianiello |
title |
Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict? |
title_short |
Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict? |
title_full |
Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict? |
title_fullStr |
Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the EU jurisprudence framework. Dialogue between systems or identity conflict? |
title_sort |
criminal process and limitation period’s provisions in the eu jurisprudence framework. dialogue between systems or identity conflict? |
publisher |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal |
series |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
issn |
2525-510X |
publishDate |
2017-10-01 |
description |
The interaction between European sources and national provisions have increased the level of uncertainty with regard to the nature of time limitation in criminal law in the Italian system. With decision no. 24/2017 the Italian Constitutional Court showed the intent to start a dialogue with the European Court of Justice, after the well-known 2015 Taricco decision. However, in referring the case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling, Italian Court threatened to make use of the “counterlimits” doctrine. It emerged therefore how difficult the cohabitation is between EU law and Italian criminal law. With decision no. 24/2017 the problems raised by Taricco saga were just postponed, though they are far from being resolved. It seems difficult at the current time to understand how certain sensitive features of the Italian criminal justice system, representative of its identity, such as the time limitation provisions, could be harmonised with the supranational set of rules coming from the EU law. |
topic |
Diritto penale europeo Legalità Prescrizione Processo penale. |
url |
http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/99 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michelecaianiello criminalprocessandlimitationperiodsprovisionsintheeujurisprudenceframeworkdialoguebetweensystemsoridentityconflict |
_version_ |
1724835097306202112 |