Evaluation of energy savings potential of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) from variable air volume (VAV) in the U.S. climate locations

Variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems are known for their high energy performance and thus can improve energy efficiency both in residential and commercial buildings. The energy savings potential of this system has been demonstrated in several studies by comparing the system performance with conve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dongsu Kim, Sam J. Cox, Heejin Cho, Piljae Im
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-11-01
Series:Energy Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484717300562
id doaj-7c5f456a46ae4e27bdd89baee4386b9e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c5f456a46ae4e27bdd89baee4386b9e2020-11-24T23:48:45ZengElsevierEnergy Reports2352-48472017-11-013C859310.1016/j.egyr.2017.05.002Evaluation of energy savings potential of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) from variable air volume (VAV) in the U.S. climate locationsDongsu Kim0Sam J. Cox1Heejin Cho2Piljae Im3Mechanical Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USAMechanical Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USAMechanical Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USABuilding Technologies Research and Integration Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN 37831, USAVariable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems are known for their high energy performance and thus can improve energy efficiency both in residential and commercial buildings. The energy savings potential of this system has been demonstrated in several studies by comparing the system performance with conventional HVAC systems such as rooftop variable air volume systems (RTU-VAV) and central chiller and boiler systems. This paper evaluates the performance of VRF and RTU-VAV systems in a simulation environment using widely-accepted whole building energy modeling software, EnergyPlus. A medium office prototype building model, developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is used to assess the performance of VRF and RTU-VAV systems. Each system is placed in 16 different locations, representing all U.S. climate zones, to evaluate the performance variations. Both models are compliant with the minimum energy code requirements prescribed in ASHRAE standard 90.1-2010 — energy standard for buildings except low-rise residential buildings. Finally, a comparison study between the simulation results of VRF and RTU-VAV models is made to demonstrate energy savings potential of VRF systems. The simulation results show that the VRF systems would save around 15–42% and 18–33% for HVAC site and source energy uses compared to the RTU-VAV systems. In addition, calculated results for annual HVAC cost savings point out that hot and mild climates show higher percentage cost savings for the VRF systems than cold climates mainly due to the differences in electricity and gas use for heating sources.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484717300562Variable refrigerant flowRooftop unitVariable air volumeBuilding simulationU.S. climate zones
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dongsu Kim
Sam J. Cox
Heejin Cho
Piljae Im
spellingShingle Dongsu Kim
Sam J. Cox
Heejin Cho
Piljae Im
Evaluation of energy savings potential of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) from variable air volume (VAV) in the U.S. climate locations
Energy Reports
Variable refrigerant flow
Rooftop unit
Variable air volume
Building simulation
U.S. climate zones
author_facet Dongsu Kim
Sam J. Cox
Heejin Cho
Piljae Im
author_sort Dongsu Kim
title Evaluation of energy savings potential of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) from variable air volume (VAV) in the U.S. climate locations
title_short Evaluation of energy savings potential of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) from variable air volume (VAV) in the U.S. climate locations
title_full Evaluation of energy savings potential of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) from variable air volume (VAV) in the U.S. climate locations
title_fullStr Evaluation of energy savings potential of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) from variable air volume (VAV) in the U.S. climate locations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of energy savings potential of variable refrigerant flow (VRF) from variable air volume (VAV) in the U.S. climate locations
title_sort evaluation of energy savings potential of variable refrigerant flow (vrf) from variable air volume (vav) in the u.s. climate locations
publisher Elsevier
series Energy Reports
issn 2352-4847
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems are known for their high energy performance and thus can improve energy efficiency both in residential and commercial buildings. The energy savings potential of this system has been demonstrated in several studies by comparing the system performance with conventional HVAC systems such as rooftop variable air volume systems (RTU-VAV) and central chiller and boiler systems. This paper evaluates the performance of VRF and RTU-VAV systems in a simulation environment using widely-accepted whole building energy modeling software, EnergyPlus. A medium office prototype building model, developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is used to assess the performance of VRF and RTU-VAV systems. Each system is placed in 16 different locations, representing all U.S. climate zones, to evaluate the performance variations. Both models are compliant with the minimum energy code requirements prescribed in ASHRAE standard 90.1-2010 — energy standard for buildings except low-rise residential buildings. Finally, a comparison study between the simulation results of VRF and RTU-VAV models is made to demonstrate energy savings potential of VRF systems. The simulation results show that the VRF systems would save around 15–42% and 18–33% for HVAC site and source energy uses compared to the RTU-VAV systems. In addition, calculated results for annual HVAC cost savings point out that hot and mild climates show higher percentage cost savings for the VRF systems than cold climates mainly due to the differences in electricity and gas use for heating sources.
topic Variable refrigerant flow
Rooftop unit
Variable air volume
Building simulation
U.S. climate zones
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484717300562
work_keys_str_mv AT dongsukim evaluationofenergysavingspotentialofvariablerefrigerantflowvrffromvariableairvolumevavintheusclimatelocations
AT samjcox evaluationofenergysavingspotentialofvariablerefrigerantflowvrffromvariableairvolumevavintheusclimatelocations
AT heejincho evaluationofenergysavingspotentialofvariablerefrigerantflowvrffromvariableairvolumevavintheusclimatelocations
AT piljaeim evaluationofenergysavingspotentialofvariablerefrigerantflowvrffromvariableairvolumevavintheusclimatelocations
_version_ 1725484775296204800