Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience

Background. In patients with known or suspected risk factors for gastrointestinal stenosis, the PillCam patency capsule (PC) is given before a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in order to minimize the risk of capsule retention (CR). CR is considered unlikely upon excretion of the PC within 30 hours, ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Römmele, J. Brueckner, H. Messmann, S. K. Gölder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9657053
id doaj-7c559a88047748aeb6e1805c4b784ee6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c559a88047748aeb6e1805c4b784ee62020-11-24T22:17:45ZengHindawi LimitedGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/96570539657053Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World ExperienceC. Römmele0J. Brueckner1H. Messmann2S. K. Gölder3Department of Gastroenterology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, GermanyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, GermanyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, GermanyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, GermanyBackground. In patients with known or suspected risk factors for gastrointestinal stenosis, the PillCam patency capsule (PC) is given before a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in order to minimize the risk of capsule retention (CR). CR is considered unlikely upon excretion of the PC within 30 hours, excretion in an undamaged state after 30 hours, or radiological projection to the colon. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of 38 patients with risk factors for CR, who received a PC from 02/2013 to 04/2015 at Klinikum Augsburg. Results. Sixteen of our 38 patients observed a natural excretion after a mean time of 34 hours past ingestion. However, only 8 patients observed excretion within 30 hours, as recommended by the company. In 20 patients passage of the PC into the colon was shown via RFID-scan or radiological imaging (after 33 and 45 hours, resp.). Only 2 patients showed a pathologic PC result. In consequence, 32 patients received the VCE; no CR was observed. Conclusion. Our data indicates that a VCE could safely be performed even if the PC excretion time is longer than 30 hours and the excreted PC was not screened for damage.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9657053
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. Römmele
J. Brueckner
H. Messmann
S. K. Gölder
spellingShingle C. Römmele
J. Brueckner
H. Messmann
S. K. Gölder
Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
author_facet C. Römmele
J. Brueckner
H. Messmann
S. K. Gölder
author_sort C. Römmele
title Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience
title_short Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience
title_full Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience
title_fullStr Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience
title_sort clinical experience with the pillcam patency capsule prior to video capsule endoscopy: a real-world experience
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background. In patients with known or suspected risk factors for gastrointestinal stenosis, the PillCam patency capsule (PC) is given before a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in order to minimize the risk of capsule retention (CR). CR is considered unlikely upon excretion of the PC within 30 hours, excretion in an undamaged state after 30 hours, or radiological projection to the colon. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of 38 patients with risk factors for CR, who received a PC from 02/2013 to 04/2015 at Klinikum Augsburg. Results. Sixteen of our 38 patients observed a natural excretion after a mean time of 34 hours past ingestion. However, only 8 patients observed excretion within 30 hours, as recommended by the company. In 20 patients passage of the PC into the colon was shown via RFID-scan or radiological imaging (after 33 and 45 hours, resp.). Only 2 patients showed a pathologic PC result. In consequence, 32 patients received the VCE; no CR was observed. Conclusion. Our data indicates that a VCE could safely be performed even if the PC excretion time is longer than 30 hours and the excreted PC was not screened for damage.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9657053
work_keys_str_mv AT crommele clinicalexperiencewiththepillcampatencycapsulepriortovideocapsuleendoscopyarealworldexperience
AT jbrueckner clinicalexperiencewiththepillcampatencycapsulepriortovideocapsuleendoscopyarealworldexperience
AT hmessmann clinicalexperiencewiththepillcampatencycapsulepriortovideocapsuleendoscopyarealworldexperience
AT skgolder clinicalexperiencewiththepillcampatencycapsulepriortovideocapsuleendoscopyarealworldexperience
_version_ 1725784672184565760