Development and Validation of a Machine Learned Turbulence Model
A stand-alone machine learned turbulence model is developed and applied for the solution of steady and unsteady boundary layer equations, and issues and constraints associated with the model are investigated. The results demonstrate that an accurately trained machine learned model can provide grid c...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1465 |
id |
doaj-7c4c1fba73b44db58974174dc7b646d6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7c4c1fba73b44db58974174dc7b646d62021-03-09T00:01:58ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-03-01141465146510.3390/en14051465Development and Validation of a Machine Learned Turbulence ModelShanti Bhushan0Greg W. Burgreen1Wesley Brewer2Ian D. Dettwiller3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USACenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USADoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program PET/GDIT, Vicksburg, MS 39180, USAEngineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), Vicksburg, MS 39180, USAA stand-alone machine learned turbulence model is developed and applied for the solution of steady and unsteady boundary layer equations, and issues and constraints associated with the model are investigated. The results demonstrate that an accurately trained machine learned model can provide grid convergent, smooth solutions, work in extrapolation mode, and converge to a correct solution from ill-posed flow conditions. The accuracy of the machine learned response surface depends on the choice of flow variables, and training approach to minimize the overlap in the datasets. For the former, grouping flow variables into a problem relevant parameter for input features is desirable. For the latter, incorporation of physics-based constraints during training is helpful. Data clustering is also identified to be a useful tool as it avoids skewness of the model towards a dominant flow feature.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1465turbulence modelingmachine learningDNS |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shanti Bhushan Greg W. Burgreen Wesley Brewer Ian D. Dettwiller |
spellingShingle |
Shanti Bhushan Greg W. Burgreen Wesley Brewer Ian D. Dettwiller Development and Validation of a Machine Learned Turbulence Model Energies turbulence modeling machine learning DNS |
author_facet |
Shanti Bhushan Greg W. Burgreen Wesley Brewer Ian D. Dettwiller |
author_sort |
Shanti Bhushan |
title |
Development and Validation of a Machine Learned Turbulence Model |
title_short |
Development and Validation of a Machine Learned Turbulence Model |
title_full |
Development and Validation of a Machine Learned Turbulence Model |
title_fullStr |
Development and Validation of a Machine Learned Turbulence Model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development and Validation of a Machine Learned Turbulence Model |
title_sort |
development and validation of a machine learned turbulence model |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Energies |
issn |
1996-1073 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
A stand-alone machine learned turbulence model is developed and applied for the solution of steady and unsteady boundary layer equations, and issues and constraints associated with the model are investigated. The results demonstrate that an accurately trained machine learned model can provide grid convergent, smooth solutions, work in extrapolation mode, and converge to a correct solution from ill-posed flow conditions. The accuracy of the machine learned response surface depends on the choice of flow variables, and training approach to minimize the overlap in the datasets. For the former, grouping flow variables into a problem relevant parameter for input features is desirable. For the latter, incorporation of physics-based constraints during training is helpful. Data clustering is also identified to be a useful tool as it avoids skewness of the model towards a dominant flow feature. |
topic |
turbulence modeling machine learning DNS |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1465 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shantibhushan developmentandvalidationofamachinelearnedturbulencemodel AT gregwburgreen developmentandvalidationofamachinelearnedturbulencemodel AT wesleybrewer developmentandvalidationofamachinelearnedturbulencemodel AT ianddettwiller developmentandvalidationofamachinelearnedturbulencemodel |
_version_ |
1724228455479902208 |