Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche

The paper reports on a user study of a digital library collection of Early Canadiana material, with comparisons to the use of the material in original paper and microfiche formats. The study included a survey of individuals who had used Early Canadiana in original paper, microfiche or WWW format, fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wendy M. Duff, Joan M. Cherry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Borås 2000-01-01
Series:Information Research: An International Electronic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://informationr.net/ir/6-1/paper86.html
id doaj-7c49a1a72b7440b5aa542c9ae720875e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c49a1a72b7440b5aa542c9ae720875e2020-11-24T21:18:26ZengUniversity of BoråsInformation Research: An International Electronic Journal1368-16132000-01-016186Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microficheWendy M. DuffJoan M. CherryThe paper reports on a user study of a digital library collection of Early Canadiana material, with comparisons to the use of the material in original paper and microfiche formats. The study included a survey of individuals who had used Early Canadiana in original paper, microfiche or WWW format, focus group sessions, and server log analysis. The purpose of the study was to compare use and user satisfaction across the three formats to identify ways to improve the WWW format. Although, as expected, many people liked the paper format the best, over half of those who had experience with all three formats thought that the WWW format would be most useful in their work.  However, some users expressed concerns about the authenticity of the WWW format.  This raises questions for digital libraries to make explicit the relationship between the original paper and digital formats. The research led to 26 recommendations. To date, over half have been implemented or are in the process of being implemented.  The paper concludes with suggestions for future research.http://informationr.net/ir/6-1/paper86.htmldigital librariesEarly Canadianamicrofichesurveyfocus groupserver log analysisuser satisfactionWWW format
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wendy M. Duff
Joan M. Cherry
spellingShingle Wendy M. Duff
Joan M. Cherry
Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche
Information Research: An International Electronic Journal
digital libraries
Early Canadiana
microfiche
survey
focus group
server log analysis
user satisfaction
WWW format
author_facet Wendy M. Duff
Joan M. Cherry
author_sort Wendy M. Duff
title Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche
title_short Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche
title_full Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche
title_fullStr Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche
title_full_unstemmed Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche
title_sort use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche
publisher University of Borås
series Information Research: An International Electronic Journal
issn 1368-1613
publishDate 2000-01-01
description The paper reports on a user study of a digital library collection of Early Canadiana material, with comparisons to the use of the material in original paper and microfiche formats. The study included a survey of individuals who had used Early Canadiana in original paper, microfiche or WWW format, focus group sessions, and server log analysis. The purpose of the study was to compare use and user satisfaction across the three formats to identify ways to improve the WWW format. Although, as expected, many people liked the paper format the best, over half of those who had experience with all three formats thought that the WWW format would be most useful in their work.  However, some users expressed concerns about the authenticity of the WWW format.  This raises questions for digital libraries to make explicit the relationship between the original paper and digital formats. The research led to 26 recommendations. To date, over half have been implemented or are in the process of being implemented.  The paper concludes with suggestions for future research.
topic digital libraries
Early Canadiana
microfiche
survey
focus group
server log analysis
user satisfaction
WWW format
url http://informationr.net/ir/6-1/paper86.html
work_keys_str_mv AT wendymduff useofhistoricaldocumentsinadigitalworldcomparisonswithoriginalmaterialsandmicrofiche
AT joanmcherry useofhistoricaldocumentsinadigitalworldcomparisonswithoriginalmaterialsandmicrofiche
_version_ 1726009209045123072