Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche
The paper reports on a user study of a digital library collection of Early Canadiana material, with comparisons to the use of the material in original paper and microfiche formats. The study included a survey of individuals who had used Early Canadiana in original paper, microfiche or WWW format, fo...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Borås
2000-01-01
|
Series: | Information Research: An International Electronic Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://informationr.net/ir/6-1/paper86.html |
id |
doaj-7c49a1a72b7440b5aa542c9ae720875e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7c49a1a72b7440b5aa542c9ae720875e2020-11-24T21:18:26ZengUniversity of BoråsInformation Research: An International Electronic Journal1368-16132000-01-016186Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microficheWendy M. DuffJoan M. CherryThe paper reports on a user study of a digital library collection of Early Canadiana material, with comparisons to the use of the material in original paper and microfiche formats. The study included a survey of individuals who had used Early Canadiana in original paper, microfiche or WWW format, focus group sessions, and server log analysis. The purpose of the study was to compare use and user satisfaction across the three formats to identify ways to improve the WWW format. Although, as expected, many people liked the paper format the best, over half of those who had experience with all three formats thought that the WWW format would be most useful in their work. However, some users expressed concerns about the authenticity of the WWW format. This raises questions for digital libraries to make explicit the relationship between the original paper and digital formats. The research led to 26 recommendations. To date, over half have been implemented or are in the process of being implemented. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research.http://informationr.net/ir/6-1/paper86.htmldigital librariesEarly Canadianamicrofichesurveyfocus groupserver log analysisuser satisfactionWWW format |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wendy M. Duff Joan M. Cherry |
spellingShingle |
Wendy M. Duff Joan M. Cherry Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche Information Research: An International Electronic Journal digital libraries Early Canadiana microfiche survey focus group server log analysis user satisfaction WWW format |
author_facet |
Wendy M. Duff Joan M. Cherry |
author_sort |
Wendy M. Duff |
title |
Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche |
title_short |
Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche |
title_full |
Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche |
title_fullStr |
Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche |
title_sort |
use of historical documents in a digital world: comparisons with original materials and microfiche |
publisher |
University of Borås |
series |
Information Research: An International Electronic Journal |
issn |
1368-1613 |
publishDate |
2000-01-01 |
description |
The paper reports on a user study of a digital library collection of Early Canadiana material, with comparisons to the use of the material in original paper and microfiche formats. The study included a survey of individuals who had used Early Canadiana in original paper, microfiche or WWW format, focus group sessions, and server log analysis. The purpose of the study was to compare use and user satisfaction across the three formats to identify ways to improve the WWW format. Although, as expected, many people liked the paper format the best, over half of those who had experience with all three formats thought that the WWW format would be most useful in their work. However, some users expressed concerns about the authenticity of the WWW format. This raises questions for digital libraries to make explicit the relationship between the original paper and digital formats. The research led to 26 recommendations. To date, over half have been implemented or are in the process of being implemented. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research. |
topic |
digital libraries Early Canadiana microfiche survey focus group server log analysis user satisfaction WWW format |
url |
http://informationr.net/ir/6-1/paper86.html |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wendymduff useofhistoricaldocumentsinadigitalworldcomparisonswithoriginalmaterialsandmicrofiche AT joanmcherry useofhistoricaldocumentsinadigitalworldcomparisonswithoriginalmaterialsandmicrofiche |
_version_ |
1726009209045123072 |