Intrauterine growth restriction: contemporary issues in diagnosis and management

• Main Authors: Hristiana Capros, Iana Scoricova, Luminita Mihalcean
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Scientific Medical Association of Moldova 2017-04-01
• Series: The Moldovan Medical Journal
• Subjects: intrauterine growth restriction; small for gestational age; foetal Doppler; foetal biometry
• Online Access: http://moldmedjournal.md/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/moldmedjournal-2017-602-capros-full-article.pdf
• ISSN: 2537-6373; 2537-6381

Background: Intrauterine growth restriction represents a fetal life treating condition in obstetrics. Diagnosis and appropriate management during pregnancy is essential because of the considerable morbidity and mortality to which restricted new-borns are exposed. Implementation of diagnostic criteria could potentially determine an optimized outcome in these patients. Material and methods: The article reflects a study of 728 cases of patients delivered to the Obstetrical department of Municipal Hospital No1, Chisinau, the Republic of Moldova during January-December 2016. A special protocol for clinical and paraclinical data collection was used. From these 728 cases, 50 histories of low birth weight fetuses (<2500g) were analysed in detail. Results: The average weight of LBW fetuses was 2057 gr. 27 fetuses (54%) were diagnosed as intrauterine growth restricted fetuses. The average weight offetuses with the diagnosis of IUGR was 1989 gr. 18.52% infants had a very low birth weight (1000-1499 g.), 84.48% infants had low birth weight (2500-1500 g). Conclusions: The prevalent criteria for diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction in our study were foetal abdominal circumference below 10th percentile(52.3 %). The ultrasound evaluation showed to have an average sensitivity in the predicting the foetal weight at birth (47.6%). In the majority of casesthe delivery was done by cesarian section (62.9%), with the most frequent indication for foetal extraction – vascular redistribution and beginning ofcerebral vasodilatation (37.5 %).