Mind-Matter Entanglement Correlations: Blind Analysis of a new Correlation Matrix Experiment

The work reported here is a rigorous conceptual replication of the so-called “Correlation-Matrix” experiment by an independent author. The experiment has been built from scratch with new hardware and software, testing 200 participants that have spent about half an hour each trying to ‘influence’ a p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hartmut Grote
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SSE 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Scientific Exploration
Online Access:http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/1931
id doaj-7c31cc5d1669402680e0b4d1b93c71f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7c31cc5d1669402680e0b4d1b93c71f12021-06-17T02:38:10ZengSSEJournal of Scientific Exploration0892-33102021-06-0135210.31275/20211931Mind-Matter Entanglement Correlations: Blind Analysis of a new Correlation Matrix ExperimentHartmut Grote0Cardiff UniversitySchool of Physics and AstronomyCardiff, United KingdomThe work reported here is a rigorous conceptual replication of the so-called “Correlation-Matrix” experiment by an independent author. The experiment has been built from scratch with new hardware and software, testing 200 participants that have spent about half an hour each trying to ‘influence’ a physical random process visualized for feedback. The analysis software has been conceptualized following a strict blind analysis protocol. Blind analysis is a more rigid form of pre-registered analysis, in which the complete analysis software is written and tested before the data is actually analysed for the effect under study. The unblinding of the analysis, also called ‘opening of the box’ of the experiment described here has been performed live at the PA convention 2019 in Paris. The main result was found to be not statistically significant and fell well within the expected random distribution of possible results. A second experiment, also following a blind analysis protocol, included questionnaires that were correlated with the participants’ performance to ‘influence’ the physical random process (the main psi task). This yielded a probability of p=0.06 to have occurred by chance, under a null hypothesis. A post-hoc analysis of the hit rate for the psi task across all participants, which is mathematically independent from the correlation analysis, yielded a probability of p=0.06 as well, to have occurred by chance. Three unexpected anecdotal incidences that occurred during the execution of the experiment and the testing and actual analysis of the data may add to the canon of oddities and trickster-like effects sometimes reported in parapsychology research. http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/1931
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hartmut Grote
spellingShingle Hartmut Grote
Mind-Matter Entanglement Correlations: Blind Analysis of a new Correlation Matrix Experiment
Journal of Scientific Exploration
author_facet Hartmut Grote
author_sort Hartmut Grote
title Mind-Matter Entanglement Correlations: Blind Analysis of a new Correlation Matrix Experiment
title_short Mind-Matter Entanglement Correlations: Blind Analysis of a new Correlation Matrix Experiment
title_full Mind-Matter Entanglement Correlations: Blind Analysis of a new Correlation Matrix Experiment
title_fullStr Mind-Matter Entanglement Correlations: Blind Analysis of a new Correlation Matrix Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Mind-Matter Entanglement Correlations: Blind Analysis of a new Correlation Matrix Experiment
title_sort mind-matter entanglement correlations: blind analysis of a new correlation matrix experiment
publisher SSE
series Journal of Scientific Exploration
issn 0892-3310
publishDate 2021-06-01
description The work reported here is a rigorous conceptual replication of the so-called “Correlation-Matrix” experiment by an independent author. The experiment has been built from scratch with new hardware and software, testing 200 participants that have spent about half an hour each trying to ‘influence’ a physical random process visualized for feedback. The analysis software has been conceptualized following a strict blind analysis protocol. Blind analysis is a more rigid form of pre-registered analysis, in which the complete analysis software is written and tested before the data is actually analysed for the effect under study. The unblinding of the analysis, also called ‘opening of the box’ of the experiment described here has been performed live at the PA convention 2019 in Paris. The main result was found to be not statistically significant and fell well within the expected random distribution of possible results. A second experiment, also following a blind analysis protocol, included questionnaires that were correlated with the participants’ performance to ‘influence’ the physical random process (the main psi task). This yielded a probability of p=0.06 to have occurred by chance, under a null hypothesis. A post-hoc analysis of the hit rate for the psi task across all participants, which is mathematically independent from the correlation analysis, yielded a probability of p=0.06 as well, to have occurred by chance. Three unexpected anecdotal incidences that occurred during the execution of the experiment and the testing and actual analysis of the data may add to the canon of oddities and trickster-like effects sometimes reported in parapsychology research.
url http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/1931
work_keys_str_mv AT hartmutgrote mindmatterentanglementcorrelationsblindanalysisofanewcorrelationmatrixexperiment
_version_ 1721374638022328320